Setting priorities for safe motherhood programme evaluation

a participatory process in three developing countries

Banyana Cecilia Madi, Julia Hussein, Sennen Hounton, Lucia D'Ambruoso, Endang Achadi, Daniel Kojo Arhinful

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A participatory approach to priority setting in programme evaluation may help improve the allocation and more efficient use of scarce resources especially in low-income countries. Research agendas that are the result of collaboration between researchers, programme managers, policy makers and other stakeholders have the potential to ensure rigorous studies are conducted on matters of local priority, based on local, expert knowledge.

This paper describes a process involving key stakeholders to elicit and prioritise evaluation needs for safe motherhood in three developing countries. A series of reiterative consultations with safe motherhood stakeholders from each country was conducted over a period of 36 months. In each country, the consultation process consisted of a series of participatory workshops; firstly, stakeholder's views on evaluation were elicited with parallel descriptive work on the contexts. Secondly, priorities for evaluation were identified from stakeholders; thirdly, the evaluation-priorities were refined; and finally, the evaluation research questions, reflecting the identified priorities, were agreed and finalised. Three evaluation-questions were identified in each country, and one selected, on which a full scale evaluation was undertaken.

While there is a great deal written about the importance of transparent and participatory priority setting in evaluation; few examples of how such processes could be implemented exist, particularly for maternal health programmes. Our experience demonstrates that the investment in a participatory priority-setting effort is high but the process undertaken resulted in both globally and contextually-relevant priorities for evaluation. This experience provides useful lessons for public health practitioners committed to bridging the research-policy interface. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)94-104
Number of pages11
JournalHealth Policy
Volume83
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2007

Keywords

  • programme evaluation
  • safe motherhood
  • participatory priority setting
  • reproductive health-services
  • reforms

Cite this

Setting priorities for safe motherhood programme evaluation : a participatory process in three developing countries. / Madi, Banyana Cecilia; Hussein, Julia; Hounton, Sennen; D'Ambruoso, Lucia; Achadi, Endang; Arhinful, Daniel Kojo.

In: Health Policy, Vol. 83, No. 1, 09.2007, p. 94-104.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Madi, Banyana Cecilia ; Hussein, Julia ; Hounton, Sennen ; D'Ambruoso, Lucia ; Achadi, Endang ; Arhinful, Daniel Kojo. / Setting priorities for safe motherhood programme evaluation : a participatory process in three developing countries. In: Health Policy. 2007 ; Vol. 83, No. 1. pp. 94-104.
@article{5cbb596b1b2e4c8a9b981d9f68f946bb,
title = "Setting priorities for safe motherhood programme evaluation: a participatory process in three developing countries",
abstract = "A participatory approach to priority setting in programme evaluation may help improve the allocation and more efficient use of scarce resources especially in low-income countries. Research agendas that are the result of collaboration between researchers, programme managers, policy makers and other stakeholders have the potential to ensure rigorous studies are conducted on matters of local priority, based on local, expert knowledge. This paper describes a process involving key stakeholders to elicit and prioritise evaluation needs for safe motherhood in three developing countries. A series of reiterative consultations with safe motherhood stakeholders from each country was conducted over a period of 36 months. In each country, the consultation process consisted of a series of participatory workshops; firstly, stakeholder's views on evaluation were elicited with parallel descriptive work on the contexts. Secondly, priorities for evaluation were identified from stakeholders; thirdly, the evaluation-priorities were refined; and finally, the evaluation research questions, reflecting the identified priorities, were agreed and finalised. Three evaluation-questions were identified in each country, and one selected, on which a full scale evaluation was undertaken. While there is a great deal written about the importance of transparent and participatory priority setting in evaluation; few examples of how such processes could be implemented exist, particularly for maternal health programmes. Our experience demonstrates that the investment in a participatory priority-setting effort is high but the process undertaken resulted in both globally and contextually-relevant priorities for evaluation. This experience provides useful lessons for public health practitioners committed to bridging the research-policy interface. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.",
keywords = "programme evaluation, safe motherhood, participatory priority setting, reproductive health-services, reforms",
author = "Madi, {Banyana Cecilia} and Julia Hussein and Sennen Hounton and Lucia D'Ambruoso and Endang Achadi and Arhinful, {Daniel Kojo}",
year = "2007",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1016/j.healthpol.2007.01.006",
language = "English",
volume = "83",
pages = "94--104",
journal = "Health Policy",
issn = "0168-8510",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Setting priorities for safe motherhood programme evaluation

T2 - a participatory process in three developing countries

AU - Madi, Banyana Cecilia

AU - Hussein, Julia

AU - Hounton, Sennen

AU - D'Ambruoso, Lucia

AU - Achadi, Endang

AU - Arhinful, Daniel Kojo

PY - 2007/9

Y1 - 2007/9

N2 - A participatory approach to priority setting in programme evaluation may help improve the allocation and more efficient use of scarce resources especially in low-income countries. Research agendas that are the result of collaboration between researchers, programme managers, policy makers and other stakeholders have the potential to ensure rigorous studies are conducted on matters of local priority, based on local, expert knowledge. This paper describes a process involving key stakeholders to elicit and prioritise evaluation needs for safe motherhood in three developing countries. A series of reiterative consultations with safe motherhood stakeholders from each country was conducted over a period of 36 months. In each country, the consultation process consisted of a series of participatory workshops; firstly, stakeholder's views on evaluation were elicited with parallel descriptive work on the contexts. Secondly, priorities for evaluation were identified from stakeholders; thirdly, the evaluation-priorities were refined; and finally, the evaluation research questions, reflecting the identified priorities, were agreed and finalised. Three evaluation-questions were identified in each country, and one selected, on which a full scale evaluation was undertaken. While there is a great deal written about the importance of transparent and participatory priority setting in evaluation; few examples of how such processes could be implemented exist, particularly for maternal health programmes. Our experience demonstrates that the investment in a participatory priority-setting effort is high but the process undertaken resulted in both globally and contextually-relevant priorities for evaluation. This experience provides useful lessons for public health practitioners committed to bridging the research-policy interface. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

AB - A participatory approach to priority setting in programme evaluation may help improve the allocation and more efficient use of scarce resources especially in low-income countries. Research agendas that are the result of collaboration between researchers, programme managers, policy makers and other stakeholders have the potential to ensure rigorous studies are conducted on matters of local priority, based on local, expert knowledge. This paper describes a process involving key stakeholders to elicit and prioritise evaluation needs for safe motherhood in three developing countries. A series of reiterative consultations with safe motherhood stakeholders from each country was conducted over a period of 36 months. In each country, the consultation process consisted of a series of participatory workshops; firstly, stakeholder's views on evaluation were elicited with parallel descriptive work on the contexts. Secondly, priorities for evaluation were identified from stakeholders; thirdly, the evaluation-priorities were refined; and finally, the evaluation research questions, reflecting the identified priorities, were agreed and finalised. Three evaluation-questions were identified in each country, and one selected, on which a full scale evaluation was undertaken. While there is a great deal written about the importance of transparent and participatory priority setting in evaluation; few examples of how such processes could be implemented exist, particularly for maternal health programmes. Our experience demonstrates that the investment in a participatory priority-setting effort is high but the process undertaken resulted in both globally and contextually-relevant priorities for evaluation. This experience provides useful lessons for public health practitioners committed to bridging the research-policy interface. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

KW - programme evaluation

KW - safe motherhood

KW - participatory priority setting

KW - reproductive health-services

KW - reforms

U2 - 10.1016/j.healthpol.2007.01.006

DO - 10.1016/j.healthpol.2007.01.006

M3 - Article

VL - 83

SP - 94

EP - 104

JO - Health Policy

JF - Health Policy

SN - 0168-8510

IS - 1

ER -