Shared understandings of dementia? An application of the Common Sense Self Regulation Model to a case study

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)
4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This in-depth case study explored whether one health care triad (a person with a diagnosis of dementia (PWD), their caregiver and primary care doctor) spoke about diagnosis in terms of the Common Sense-Self Regulation Model (CS-SRM) (H. Leventhal, et al., 1984) Illness Representations (IRs: identity, cause, timeline, consequences and the ability to cure or control the condition), and consider whether PWD IRs are understood by their caregiver and doctor. Each participant was asked a series of open questions, followed by questions prompting for each IR. The caregiver and doctor were interviewed about how PWD thought. All talked about IRs without prompting, with the exception of cause. Prompting for IRs elicited additional data. There were areas where participants shared IRs, but also areas of discrepancy which could have implications for health outcomes. IRs can provide a theoretical framework to elicit how people think about dementia, which could improve shared understandings in clinical practice.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)217-250
Number of pages34
JournalDementia: the international journal of social research and practice
Volume11
Issue number2
Early online date15 Nov 2011
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Fingerprint

self-regulation
dementia
caregiver
cause
illness
health care
human being
ability
health

Cite this

@article{a7f177db48744c71af609f2368ed7b2e,
title = "Shared understandings of dementia?: An application of the Common Sense Self Regulation Model to a case study",
abstract = "This in-depth case study explored whether one health care triad (a person with a diagnosis of dementia (PWD), their caregiver and primary care doctor) spoke about diagnosis in terms of the Common Sense-Self Regulation Model (CS-SRM) (H. Leventhal, et al., 1984) Illness Representations (IRs: identity, cause, timeline, consequences and the ability to cure or control the condition), and consider whether PWD IRs are understood by their caregiver and doctor. Each participant was asked a series of open questions, followed by questions prompting for each IR. The caregiver and doctor were interviewed about how PWD thought. All talked about IRs without prompting, with the exception of cause. Prompting for IRs elicited additional data. There were areas where participants shared IRs, but also areas of discrepancy which could have implications for health outcomes. IRs can provide a theoretical framework to elicit how people think about dementia, which could improve shared understandings in clinical practice.",
author = "Elizabeth Glidewell and Marie Johnston and Thomas, {Ruth Elizabeth}",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1177/1471301211416611",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "217--250",
journal = "Dementia: the international journal of social research and practice",
issn = "1471-3012",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Shared understandings of dementia?

T2 - An application of the Common Sense Self Regulation Model to a case study

AU - Glidewell, Elizabeth

AU - Johnston, Marie

AU - Thomas, Ruth Elizabeth

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - This in-depth case study explored whether one health care triad (a person with a diagnosis of dementia (PWD), their caregiver and primary care doctor) spoke about diagnosis in terms of the Common Sense-Self Regulation Model (CS-SRM) (H. Leventhal, et al., 1984) Illness Representations (IRs: identity, cause, timeline, consequences and the ability to cure or control the condition), and consider whether PWD IRs are understood by their caregiver and doctor. Each participant was asked a series of open questions, followed by questions prompting for each IR. The caregiver and doctor were interviewed about how PWD thought. All talked about IRs without prompting, with the exception of cause. Prompting for IRs elicited additional data. There were areas where participants shared IRs, but also areas of discrepancy which could have implications for health outcomes. IRs can provide a theoretical framework to elicit how people think about dementia, which could improve shared understandings in clinical practice.

AB - This in-depth case study explored whether one health care triad (a person with a diagnosis of dementia (PWD), their caregiver and primary care doctor) spoke about diagnosis in terms of the Common Sense-Self Regulation Model (CS-SRM) (H. Leventhal, et al., 1984) Illness Representations (IRs: identity, cause, timeline, consequences and the ability to cure or control the condition), and consider whether PWD IRs are understood by their caregiver and doctor. Each participant was asked a series of open questions, followed by questions prompting for each IR. The caregiver and doctor were interviewed about how PWD thought. All talked about IRs without prompting, with the exception of cause. Prompting for IRs elicited additional data. There were areas where participants shared IRs, but also areas of discrepancy which could have implications for health outcomes. IRs can provide a theoretical framework to elicit how people think about dementia, which could improve shared understandings in clinical practice.

U2 - 10.1177/1471301211416611

DO - 10.1177/1471301211416611

M3 - Article

VL - 11

SP - 217

EP - 250

JO - Dementia: the international journal of social research and practice

JF - Dementia: the international journal of social research and practice

SN - 1471-3012

IS - 2

ER -