Shifting dependence

The influence of partner instrumentality and self-esteem on responses to interpersonal risk.

Sarah Gomillion, Sandra L Murray

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

High and low self-esteem people typically have divergent responses to interpersonal risk. Highs draw closer to their partner, whereas lows self-protectively distance. However, these responses should be more likely when people are dependent on the rewards their partner offers. Two experiments tested the hypothesis that structural changes in the situation of interdependence lead high and low self-esteem people to reverse their typical responses to risk. When partners were instrumental to a current goal pursuit (and participants were more dependent on the rewards partners could offer), highs drew closer and lows distanced when risk was primed. However, when partners were not instrumental to an active goal (and participants were less dependent on the rewards partners could offer), these responses were reversed. Reducing one’s dependence on a partner to attain one’s personal goals appears to reduce highs’ incentive to connect, whereas it appears to increase lows’ incentive to connect.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)57-69
Number of pages13
JournalPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Volume40
Issue number1
Early online date18 Sep 2013
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2014

Fingerprint

Reward
Self Concept
Motivation

Keywords

  • self-esteem
  • close relationships
  • instrumentality
  • interdependence

Cite this

Shifting dependence : The influence of partner instrumentality and self-esteem on responses to interpersonal risk. / Gomillion, Sarah; Murray, Sandra L.

In: Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 40, No. 1, 01.2014, p. 57-69.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{9542e9388df64665adee1cdb3d2712ed,
title = "Shifting dependence: The influence of partner instrumentality and self-esteem on responses to interpersonal risk.",
abstract = "High and low self-esteem people typically have divergent responses to interpersonal risk. Highs draw closer to their partner, whereas lows self-protectively distance. However, these responses should be more likely when people are dependent on the rewards their partner offers. Two experiments tested the hypothesis that structural changes in the situation of interdependence lead high and low self-esteem people to reverse their typical responses to risk. When partners were instrumental to a current goal pursuit (and participants were more dependent on the rewards partners could offer), highs drew closer and lows distanced when risk was primed. However, when partners were not instrumental to an active goal (and participants were less dependent on the rewards partners could offer), these responses were reversed. Reducing one’s dependence on a partner to attain one’s personal goals appears to reduce highs’ incentive to connect, whereas it appears to increase lows’ incentive to connect.",
keywords = "self-esteem , close relationships, instrumentality, interdependence",
author = "Sarah Gomillion and Murray, {Sandra L}",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0146167213503885",
language = "English",
volume = "40",
pages = "57--69",
journal = "Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin",
issn = "0146-1672",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Shifting dependence

T2 - The influence of partner instrumentality and self-esteem on responses to interpersonal risk.

AU - Gomillion, Sarah

AU - Murray, Sandra L

PY - 2014/1

Y1 - 2014/1

N2 - High and low self-esteem people typically have divergent responses to interpersonal risk. Highs draw closer to their partner, whereas lows self-protectively distance. However, these responses should be more likely when people are dependent on the rewards their partner offers. Two experiments tested the hypothesis that structural changes in the situation of interdependence lead high and low self-esteem people to reverse their typical responses to risk. When partners were instrumental to a current goal pursuit (and participants were more dependent on the rewards partners could offer), highs drew closer and lows distanced when risk was primed. However, when partners were not instrumental to an active goal (and participants were less dependent on the rewards partners could offer), these responses were reversed. Reducing one’s dependence on a partner to attain one’s personal goals appears to reduce highs’ incentive to connect, whereas it appears to increase lows’ incentive to connect.

AB - High and low self-esteem people typically have divergent responses to interpersonal risk. Highs draw closer to their partner, whereas lows self-protectively distance. However, these responses should be more likely when people are dependent on the rewards their partner offers. Two experiments tested the hypothesis that structural changes in the situation of interdependence lead high and low self-esteem people to reverse their typical responses to risk. When partners were instrumental to a current goal pursuit (and participants were more dependent on the rewards partners could offer), highs drew closer and lows distanced when risk was primed. However, when partners were not instrumental to an active goal (and participants were less dependent on the rewards partners could offer), these responses were reversed. Reducing one’s dependence on a partner to attain one’s personal goals appears to reduce highs’ incentive to connect, whereas it appears to increase lows’ incentive to connect.

KW - self-esteem

KW - close relationships

KW - instrumentality

KW - interdependence

U2 - 10.1177/0146167213503885

DO - 10.1177/0146167213503885

M3 - Article

VL - 40

SP - 57

EP - 69

JO - Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

JF - Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

SN - 0146-1672

IS - 1

ER -