Shooting Decisions by Police Firearms Officers

Lucy Mitchell, Rhona Flin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study is an investigation into whether briefing information, which was heard prior to seeing a firearms incident in a firearms training simulator, affected British police officers' decisions to shoot, as measured by their shooting behavior. Police authorized firearms officers (AFOs) heard either threat or neutral briefing information and then saw a “shoot” (suspect shot at AFO) or “no-shoot” (suspect surrendered without shooting) scenario. AFOs were tested in one of four conditions: threat briefing with shoot scenario, threat briefing with no-shoot scenario, neutral briefing with shoot scenario, or neutral briefing with no-shoot scenario. A postevent questionnaire and the General Decision Making Style (GDMS) questionnaire were completed by the AFOs. Those who had heard the neutral briefing felt more surprised when they saw the suspects than did those who had heard the threat briefing, regardless of which scenario they had seen. However, the briefing type did not affect the time taken to draw and aim the gun at the screen. No shots were fired in the no-shoot scenario, regardless of which briefing the AFOs had received. Differences in preferred decision style were not related to shooting decisions. The results suggest that the briefing information did not influence the AFOs'decisions to shoot, but they attended to cues in the scenario (not identified) and responded accordingly.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)375-390
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making
Volume1
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 21 Dec 2007

Fingerprint

Firearms
Police
Law enforcement
police officer
scenario
Simulators
Decision making
threat
questionnaire
incident
police
Cues
Decision Making
decision making

Cite this

Shooting Decisions by Police Firearms Officers. / Mitchell, Lucy; Flin, Rhona.

In: Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making, Vol. 1, No. 4, 21.12.2007, p. 375-390.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e8c2ef8781f44273922456c91091ae73,
title = "Shooting Decisions by Police Firearms Officers",
abstract = "This study is an investigation into whether briefing information, which was heard prior to seeing a firearms incident in a firearms training simulator, affected British police officers' decisions to shoot, as measured by their shooting behavior. Police authorized firearms officers (AFOs) heard either threat or neutral briefing information and then saw a “shoot” (suspect shot at AFO) or “no-shoot” (suspect surrendered without shooting) scenario. AFOs were tested in one of four conditions: threat briefing with shoot scenario, threat briefing with no-shoot scenario, neutral briefing with shoot scenario, or neutral briefing with no-shoot scenario. A postevent questionnaire and the General Decision Making Style (GDMS) questionnaire were completed by the AFOs. Those who had heard the neutral briefing felt more surprised when they saw the suspects than did those who had heard the threat briefing, regardless of which scenario they had seen. However, the briefing type did not affect the time taken to draw and aim the gun at the screen. No shots were fired in the no-shoot scenario, regardless of which briefing the AFOs had received. Differences in preferred decision style were not related to shooting decisions. The results suggest that the briefing information did not influence the AFOs'decisions to shoot, but they attended to cues in the scenario (not identified) and responded accordingly.",
author = "Lucy Mitchell and Rhona Flin",
year = "2007",
month = "12",
day = "21",
doi = "10.1518/155534307X264861",
language = "English",
volume = "1",
pages = "375--390",
journal = "Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making",
issn = "1555-3434",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Shooting Decisions by Police Firearms Officers

AU - Mitchell, Lucy

AU - Flin, Rhona

PY - 2007/12/21

Y1 - 2007/12/21

N2 - This study is an investigation into whether briefing information, which was heard prior to seeing a firearms incident in a firearms training simulator, affected British police officers' decisions to shoot, as measured by their shooting behavior. Police authorized firearms officers (AFOs) heard either threat or neutral briefing information and then saw a “shoot” (suspect shot at AFO) or “no-shoot” (suspect surrendered without shooting) scenario. AFOs were tested in one of four conditions: threat briefing with shoot scenario, threat briefing with no-shoot scenario, neutral briefing with shoot scenario, or neutral briefing with no-shoot scenario. A postevent questionnaire and the General Decision Making Style (GDMS) questionnaire were completed by the AFOs. Those who had heard the neutral briefing felt more surprised when they saw the suspects than did those who had heard the threat briefing, regardless of which scenario they had seen. However, the briefing type did not affect the time taken to draw and aim the gun at the screen. No shots were fired in the no-shoot scenario, regardless of which briefing the AFOs had received. Differences in preferred decision style were not related to shooting decisions. The results suggest that the briefing information did not influence the AFOs'decisions to shoot, but they attended to cues in the scenario (not identified) and responded accordingly.

AB - This study is an investigation into whether briefing information, which was heard prior to seeing a firearms incident in a firearms training simulator, affected British police officers' decisions to shoot, as measured by their shooting behavior. Police authorized firearms officers (AFOs) heard either threat or neutral briefing information and then saw a “shoot” (suspect shot at AFO) or “no-shoot” (suspect surrendered without shooting) scenario. AFOs were tested in one of four conditions: threat briefing with shoot scenario, threat briefing with no-shoot scenario, neutral briefing with shoot scenario, or neutral briefing with no-shoot scenario. A postevent questionnaire and the General Decision Making Style (GDMS) questionnaire were completed by the AFOs. Those who had heard the neutral briefing felt more surprised when they saw the suspects than did those who had heard the threat briefing, regardless of which scenario they had seen. However, the briefing type did not affect the time taken to draw and aim the gun at the screen. No shots were fired in the no-shoot scenario, regardless of which briefing the AFOs had received. Differences in preferred decision style were not related to shooting decisions. The results suggest that the briefing information did not influence the AFOs'decisions to shoot, but they attended to cues in the scenario (not identified) and responded accordingly.

U2 - 10.1518/155534307X264861

DO - 10.1518/155534307X264861

M3 - Article

VL - 1

SP - 375

EP - 390

JO - Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making

JF - Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making

SN - 1555-3434

IS - 4

ER -