Similarity, not complexity, determines visual working memory performance

Margaret C Jackson, David E J Linden, Mark V. Roberts, Nikolaus Kriegeskorte, Corinna Haenschel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)
4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

A number of studies have shown that visual working memory (WM) is poorer for complex versus simple items, traditionally accounted for by higher information load placing greater demands on encoding and storage capacity limits. Other research suggests that it may not be complexity that determines WM performance per se, but rather increased perceptual similarity between complex items as a result of a large amount of overlapping information. Increased similarity is thought to lead to greater comparison errors between items encoded into WM and the test item(s) presented at retrieval. However, previous studies have used different object categories to manipulate complexity and similarity, raising questions as to whether these effects are simply due to cross-category differences. For the first time, here the relationship between complexity and similarity in WM using the same stimulus category (abstract polygons) are investigated. The authors used a delayed discrimination task to measure WM for 1–4 complex versus simple simultaneously presented items and manipulated the similarity between the single test item at retrieval and the sample items at encoding. WM was poorer for complex than simple items only when the test item was similar to 1 of the encoding items, and not when it was dissimilar or identical. The results provide clear support for reinterpretation of the complexity effect in WM as a similarity effect and highlight the importance of the retrieval stage in governing WM performance. The authors discuss how these findings can be reconciled with current models of WM capacity limits
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1884-1892
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition
Volume41
Issue number6
Early online date25 May 2015
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2015

Fingerprint

Short-Term Memory
performance
Visual Working Memory
Working Memory
stimulus
discrimination
Encoding
Research

Cite this

Similarity, not complexity, determines visual working memory performance. / Jackson, Margaret C; Linden, David E J; Roberts, Mark V.; Kriegeskorte, Nikolaus; Haenschel, Corinna.

In: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, Vol. 41, No. 6, 11.2015, p. 1884-1892.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Jackson, Margaret C ; Linden, David E J ; Roberts, Mark V. ; Kriegeskorte, Nikolaus ; Haenschel, Corinna. / Similarity, not complexity, determines visual working memory performance. In: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition. 2015 ; Vol. 41, No. 6. pp. 1884-1892.
@article{10f9a94edae4469c9346530f5a610d30,
title = "Similarity, not complexity, determines visual working memory performance",
abstract = "A number of studies have shown that visual working memory (WM) is poorer for complex versus simple items, traditionally accounted for by higher information load placing greater demands on encoding and storage capacity limits. Other research suggests that it may not be complexity that determines WM performance per se, but rather increased perceptual similarity between complex items as a result of a large amount of overlapping information. Increased similarity is thought to lead to greater comparison errors between items encoded into WM and the test item(s) presented at retrieval. However, previous studies have used different object categories to manipulate complexity and similarity, raising questions as to whether these effects are simply due to cross-category differences. For the first time, here the relationship between complexity and similarity in WM using the same stimulus category (abstract polygons) are investigated. The authors used a delayed discrimination task to measure WM for 1–4 complex versus simple simultaneously presented items and manipulated the similarity between the single test item at retrieval and the sample items at encoding. WM was poorer for complex than simple items only when the test item was similar to 1 of the encoding items, and not when it was dissimilar or identical. The results provide clear support for reinterpretation of the complexity effect in WM as a similarity effect and highlight the importance of the retrieval stage in governing WM performance. The authors discuss how these findings can be reconciled with current models of WM capacity limits",
author = "Jackson, {Margaret C} and Linden, {David E J} and Roberts, {Mark V.} and Nikolaus Kriegeskorte and Corinna Haenschel",
year = "2015",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1037/xlm0000125",
language = "English",
volume = "41",
pages = "1884--1892",
journal = "Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition",
issn = "0278-7393",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Similarity, not complexity, determines visual working memory performance

AU - Jackson, Margaret C

AU - Linden, David E J

AU - Roberts, Mark V.

AU - Kriegeskorte, Nikolaus

AU - Haenschel, Corinna

PY - 2015/11

Y1 - 2015/11

N2 - A number of studies have shown that visual working memory (WM) is poorer for complex versus simple items, traditionally accounted for by higher information load placing greater demands on encoding and storage capacity limits. Other research suggests that it may not be complexity that determines WM performance per se, but rather increased perceptual similarity between complex items as a result of a large amount of overlapping information. Increased similarity is thought to lead to greater comparison errors between items encoded into WM and the test item(s) presented at retrieval. However, previous studies have used different object categories to manipulate complexity and similarity, raising questions as to whether these effects are simply due to cross-category differences. For the first time, here the relationship between complexity and similarity in WM using the same stimulus category (abstract polygons) are investigated. The authors used a delayed discrimination task to measure WM for 1–4 complex versus simple simultaneously presented items and manipulated the similarity between the single test item at retrieval and the sample items at encoding. WM was poorer for complex than simple items only when the test item was similar to 1 of the encoding items, and not when it was dissimilar or identical. The results provide clear support for reinterpretation of the complexity effect in WM as a similarity effect and highlight the importance of the retrieval stage in governing WM performance. The authors discuss how these findings can be reconciled with current models of WM capacity limits

AB - A number of studies have shown that visual working memory (WM) is poorer for complex versus simple items, traditionally accounted for by higher information load placing greater demands on encoding and storage capacity limits. Other research suggests that it may not be complexity that determines WM performance per se, but rather increased perceptual similarity between complex items as a result of a large amount of overlapping information. Increased similarity is thought to lead to greater comparison errors between items encoded into WM and the test item(s) presented at retrieval. However, previous studies have used different object categories to manipulate complexity and similarity, raising questions as to whether these effects are simply due to cross-category differences. For the first time, here the relationship between complexity and similarity in WM using the same stimulus category (abstract polygons) are investigated. The authors used a delayed discrimination task to measure WM for 1–4 complex versus simple simultaneously presented items and manipulated the similarity between the single test item at retrieval and the sample items at encoding. WM was poorer for complex than simple items only when the test item was similar to 1 of the encoding items, and not when it was dissimilar or identical. The results provide clear support for reinterpretation of the complexity effect in WM as a similarity effect and highlight the importance of the retrieval stage in governing WM performance. The authors discuss how these findings can be reconciled with current models of WM capacity limits

U2 - 10.1037/xlm0000125

DO - 10.1037/xlm0000125

M3 - Article

VL - 41

SP - 1884

EP - 1892

JO - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition

JF - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition

SN - 0278-7393

IS - 6

ER -