Simple viewing tests can detect eye movement abnormalities that distinguish schizophrenia cases from controls with exceptional accuracy

Philip J Benson, Sara A Beedie, Elizabeth Shephard, Ina Giegling, Dan Rujescu, David St Clair

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

59 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We have investigated which eye-movement tests alone and combined can best discriminate schizophrenia cases from control subjects and their predictive validity. METHODS: A training set of 88 schizophrenia cases and 88 controls had a range of eye movements recorded; the predictive validity of the tests was then examined on eye-movement data from 34 9-month retest cases and controls, and from 36 novel schizophrenia cases and 52 control subjects. Eye movements were recorded during smooth pursuit, fixation stability, and free-viewing tasks. Group differences on performance measures were examined by univariate and multivariate analyses. Model fitting was used to compare regression, boosted tree, and probabilistic neural network approaches. RESULTS: As a group, schizophrenia cases differed from control subjects on almost all eye-movement tests, including horizontal and Lissajous pursuit, visual scanpath, and fixation stability; fixation dispersal during free viewing was the best single discriminator. Effects were stable over time, and independent of sex, medication, or cigarette smoking. A boosted tree model achieved perfect separation of the 88 training cases from 88 control subjects; its predictive validity on retest assessments and novel cases and control subjects was 87.8%. However, when we examined the whole data set of 298 assessments, a cross-validated probabilistic neural network model was superior and could discriminate all cases from controls with near perfect accuracy at 98.3%. CONCLUSIONS: Simple viewing patterns can detect eye-movement abnormalities that can discriminate schizophrenia cases from control subjects with exceptional accuracy.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)716-724
Number of pages9
JournalBiological Psychiatry
Volume72
Issue number9
Early online date21 May 2012
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2012

Fingerprint

Eye Abnormalities
Eye Movements
Schizophrenia
Smooth Pursuit
Neural Networks (Computer)
Multivariate Analysis
Smoking

Keywords

  • classification
  • eye-movement phenotype
  • neural network
  • predictive model
  • risk marker
  • schizophrenia

Cite this

Simple viewing tests can detect eye movement abnormalities that distinguish schizophrenia cases from controls with exceptional accuracy. / Benson, Philip J; Beedie, Sara A; Shephard, Elizabeth; Giegling, Ina; Rujescu, Dan; St Clair, David.

In: Biological Psychiatry, Vol. 72, No. 9, 01.11.2012, p. 716-724.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a6b814fa1d7e495f8b8e04bbe1f4a652,
title = "Simple viewing tests can detect eye movement abnormalities that distinguish schizophrenia cases from controls with exceptional accuracy",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: We have investigated which eye-movement tests alone and combined can best discriminate schizophrenia cases from control subjects and their predictive validity. METHODS: A training set of 88 schizophrenia cases and 88 controls had a range of eye movements recorded; the predictive validity of the tests was then examined on eye-movement data from 34 9-month retest cases and controls, and from 36 novel schizophrenia cases and 52 control subjects. Eye movements were recorded during smooth pursuit, fixation stability, and free-viewing tasks. Group differences on performance measures were examined by univariate and multivariate analyses. Model fitting was used to compare regression, boosted tree, and probabilistic neural network approaches. RESULTS: As a group, schizophrenia cases differed from control subjects on almost all eye-movement tests, including horizontal and Lissajous pursuit, visual scanpath, and fixation stability; fixation dispersal during free viewing was the best single discriminator. Effects were stable over time, and independent of sex, medication, or cigarette smoking. A boosted tree model achieved perfect separation of the 88 training cases from 88 control subjects; its predictive validity on retest assessments and novel cases and control subjects was 87.8{\%}. However, when we examined the whole data set of 298 assessments, a cross-validated probabilistic neural network model was superior and could discriminate all cases from controls with near perfect accuracy at 98.3{\%}. CONCLUSIONS: Simple viewing patterns can detect eye-movement abnormalities that can discriminate schizophrenia cases from control subjects with exceptional accuracy.",
keywords = "classification, eye-movement phenotype, neural network, predictive model , risk marker, schizophrenia",
author = "Benson, {Philip J} and Beedie, {Sara A} and Elizabeth Shephard and Ina Giegling and Dan Rujescu and {St Clair}, David",
note = "Copyright {\circledC} 2012 Society of Biological Psychiatry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.",
year = "2012",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.biopsych.2012.04.019",
language = "English",
volume = "72",
pages = "716--724",
journal = "Biological Psychiatry",
issn = "0006-3223",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Simple viewing tests can detect eye movement abnormalities that distinguish schizophrenia cases from controls with exceptional accuracy

AU - Benson, Philip J

AU - Beedie, Sara A

AU - Shephard, Elizabeth

AU - Giegling, Ina

AU - Rujescu, Dan

AU - St Clair, David

N1 - Copyright © 2012 Society of Biological Psychiatry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

PY - 2012/11/1

Y1 - 2012/11/1

N2 - BACKGROUND: We have investigated which eye-movement tests alone and combined can best discriminate schizophrenia cases from control subjects and their predictive validity. METHODS: A training set of 88 schizophrenia cases and 88 controls had a range of eye movements recorded; the predictive validity of the tests was then examined on eye-movement data from 34 9-month retest cases and controls, and from 36 novel schizophrenia cases and 52 control subjects. Eye movements were recorded during smooth pursuit, fixation stability, and free-viewing tasks. Group differences on performance measures were examined by univariate and multivariate analyses. Model fitting was used to compare regression, boosted tree, and probabilistic neural network approaches. RESULTS: As a group, schizophrenia cases differed from control subjects on almost all eye-movement tests, including horizontal and Lissajous pursuit, visual scanpath, and fixation stability; fixation dispersal during free viewing was the best single discriminator. Effects were stable over time, and independent of sex, medication, or cigarette smoking. A boosted tree model achieved perfect separation of the 88 training cases from 88 control subjects; its predictive validity on retest assessments and novel cases and control subjects was 87.8%. However, when we examined the whole data set of 298 assessments, a cross-validated probabilistic neural network model was superior and could discriminate all cases from controls with near perfect accuracy at 98.3%. CONCLUSIONS: Simple viewing patterns can detect eye-movement abnormalities that can discriminate schizophrenia cases from control subjects with exceptional accuracy.

AB - BACKGROUND: We have investigated which eye-movement tests alone and combined can best discriminate schizophrenia cases from control subjects and their predictive validity. METHODS: A training set of 88 schizophrenia cases and 88 controls had a range of eye movements recorded; the predictive validity of the tests was then examined on eye-movement data from 34 9-month retest cases and controls, and from 36 novel schizophrenia cases and 52 control subjects. Eye movements were recorded during smooth pursuit, fixation stability, and free-viewing tasks. Group differences on performance measures were examined by univariate and multivariate analyses. Model fitting was used to compare regression, boosted tree, and probabilistic neural network approaches. RESULTS: As a group, schizophrenia cases differed from control subjects on almost all eye-movement tests, including horizontal and Lissajous pursuit, visual scanpath, and fixation stability; fixation dispersal during free viewing was the best single discriminator. Effects were stable over time, and independent of sex, medication, or cigarette smoking. A boosted tree model achieved perfect separation of the 88 training cases from 88 control subjects; its predictive validity on retest assessments and novel cases and control subjects was 87.8%. However, when we examined the whole data set of 298 assessments, a cross-validated probabilistic neural network model was superior and could discriminate all cases from controls with near perfect accuracy at 98.3%. CONCLUSIONS: Simple viewing patterns can detect eye-movement abnormalities that can discriminate schizophrenia cases from control subjects with exceptional accuracy.

KW - classification

KW - eye-movement phenotype

KW - neural network

KW - predictive model

KW - risk marker

KW - schizophrenia

U2 - 10.1016/j.biopsych.2012.04.019

DO - 10.1016/j.biopsych.2012.04.019

M3 - Article

VL - 72

SP - 716

EP - 724

JO - Biological Psychiatry

JF - Biological Psychiatry

SN - 0006-3223

IS - 9

ER -