Sites of Social Centrality and Segregation

Lefebvre in Belfast, a “Divided City”

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

42 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper applies Henri Lefebvre's ideas on participatory democracy and spatial politics to the context of “divided cities”, a milieu often overlooked by scholars of Lefebvre. It considers, via Lefebvre, how the heterogeneous and contradictory statist methods to deal with ethno-national violence in Belfast have in effect increased segregated space. State-led approaches to public space as part of conflict transformation strategies appear contradictory, including attempts to “normalize” the city through inward capital investment and cultural regeneration, encouraging cosmopolitan notions of inclusive “civic identity”, and reinforcing segregation to contain violence. These processes have done little to challenge sectarianism. However, as Lefebvre suggests that dominant representations of space cannot be imposed without resistance, this paper considers the alternative strategies of a disparate range of groups in Belfast. These groups have formed cross-cleavage networks to develop ritualized street performances which challenge the programming of public space for segregation.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)326-347
Number of pages22
JournalAntipode
Volume41
Issue number2
Early online date25 Feb 2009
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2009

Fingerprint

public space
violence
segregation
sectarianism
capital investment
democracy
cleavage
politics
Group
regeneration
programming
performance
city
effect
conflict
method

Keywords

  • Lefebvre
  • divided city
  • ethno-nationalism
  • right-to-the-city

Cite this

Sites of Social Centrality and Segregation : Lefebvre in Belfast, a “Divided City”. / Nagle, John .

In: Antipode, Vol. 41, No. 2, 03.2009, p. 326-347.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4acbdf9135cf488cbea5d46852f08e6c,
title = "Sites of Social Centrality and Segregation: Lefebvre in Belfast, a “Divided City”",
abstract = "This paper applies Henri Lefebvre's ideas on participatory democracy and spatial politics to the context of “divided cities”, a milieu often overlooked by scholars of Lefebvre. It considers, via Lefebvre, how the heterogeneous and contradictory statist methods to deal with ethno-national violence in Belfast have in effect increased segregated space. State-led approaches to public space as part of conflict transformation strategies appear contradictory, including attempts to “normalize” the city through inward capital investment and cultural regeneration, encouraging cosmopolitan notions of inclusive “civic identity”, and reinforcing segregation to contain violence. These processes have done little to challenge sectarianism. However, as Lefebvre suggests that dominant representations of space cannot be imposed without resistance, this paper considers the alternative strategies of a disparate range of groups in Belfast. These groups have formed cross-cleavage networks to develop ritualized street performances which challenge the programming of public space for segregation.",
keywords = "Lefebvre , divided city , ethno-nationalism, right-to-the-city",
author = "John Nagle",
year = "2009",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1111/j.1467-8330.2009.00675.x",
language = "English",
volume = "41",
pages = "326--347",
journal = "Antipode",
issn = "0066-4812",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sites of Social Centrality and Segregation

T2 - Lefebvre in Belfast, a “Divided City”

AU - Nagle, John

PY - 2009/3

Y1 - 2009/3

N2 - This paper applies Henri Lefebvre's ideas on participatory democracy and spatial politics to the context of “divided cities”, a milieu often overlooked by scholars of Lefebvre. It considers, via Lefebvre, how the heterogeneous and contradictory statist methods to deal with ethno-national violence in Belfast have in effect increased segregated space. State-led approaches to public space as part of conflict transformation strategies appear contradictory, including attempts to “normalize” the city through inward capital investment and cultural regeneration, encouraging cosmopolitan notions of inclusive “civic identity”, and reinforcing segregation to contain violence. These processes have done little to challenge sectarianism. However, as Lefebvre suggests that dominant representations of space cannot be imposed without resistance, this paper considers the alternative strategies of a disparate range of groups in Belfast. These groups have formed cross-cleavage networks to develop ritualized street performances which challenge the programming of public space for segregation.

AB - This paper applies Henri Lefebvre's ideas on participatory democracy and spatial politics to the context of “divided cities”, a milieu often overlooked by scholars of Lefebvre. It considers, via Lefebvre, how the heterogeneous and contradictory statist methods to deal with ethno-national violence in Belfast have in effect increased segregated space. State-led approaches to public space as part of conflict transformation strategies appear contradictory, including attempts to “normalize” the city through inward capital investment and cultural regeneration, encouraging cosmopolitan notions of inclusive “civic identity”, and reinforcing segregation to contain violence. These processes have done little to challenge sectarianism. However, as Lefebvre suggests that dominant representations of space cannot be imposed without resistance, this paper considers the alternative strategies of a disparate range of groups in Belfast. These groups have formed cross-cleavage networks to develop ritualized street performances which challenge the programming of public space for segregation.

KW - Lefebvre

KW - divided city

KW - ethno-nationalism

KW - right-to-the-city

U2 - 10.1111/j.1467-8330.2009.00675.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1467-8330.2009.00675.x

M3 - Article

VL - 41

SP - 326

EP - 347

JO - Antipode

JF - Antipode

SN - 0066-4812

IS - 2

ER -