Social constraints in cross-boundary collaborative deer management

Katrin Prager, Altea Lorenzo-Arribas, Hans Bull, Mikkel Slaaen Kvernstuen, Leif Egil Loe, Atle Mysterud

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The complex interactions between different spatial, temporal, and functional scales in social-ecological systems are recognized as a key challenge in sustainable management of natural resources. We analyze scale mismatches using the example of migratory red deer (Cervus elaphus) management. Hunting practices and organization of hunting are shaped by the social and institutional context rather than the biology and space use of the species. The collaboration among landowners across property boundaries is a potential solution to address scale mismatches but a number of social constraints need to be taken into account. Based on data from a survey of attitudes and perceptions of 509 Norwegian landowners we found a number of social constraints including differing interests and objectives for deer management, land tenure arrangements, weak links between actors at different levels, lower satisfaction with current deer management and cooperation at the higher (municipality) level, information asymmetry, and different perceptions of benefits and costs of cooperation. For example, 73% of respondents were satisfied with current management at the hunting field level (smallest management unit) but only 43% at the municipality level, which represents unit sizes necessary for deer management at the population level. Seventy percent of respondents hunt mainly for enjoyment and meat whereas 30% hunt to reduce crop damage; hence aggregation into larger management units may increase internal conflict among landowners with different objectives. Our results suggest that coordination of management across property boundaries is a more realistic aim than merging of units. Given that income from hunting in Norway is generally low, we anticipate that financial incentives are unlikely to have a large impact on landowners’ willingness to cooperate. Instead, we make suggestions for enhancing existing nested governance arrangements and institutional interplay to support scale alignment by means of developing shared management objectives, and creating learning and knowledge sharing opportunities facilitated by an intermediary.
Original languageEnglish
Article number29
JournalEcology and Society
Volume23
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Fingerprint

deer
landowner
hunting
crop damage
space use
land tenure
meat
asymmetry
incentive
learning
income
cost

Keywords

  • cooperation
  • hunting
  • intermediary
  • red deer management
  • scale mismatch

Cite this

Social constraints in cross-boundary collaborative deer management. / Prager, Katrin; Lorenzo-Arribas, Altea; Bull, Hans; Slaaen Kvernstuen, Mikkel; Loe, Leif Egil; Mysterud, Atle.

In: Ecology and Society, Vol. 23, No. 4, 29, 2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Prager, Katrin ; Lorenzo-Arribas, Altea ; Bull, Hans ; Slaaen Kvernstuen, Mikkel ; Loe, Leif Egil ; Mysterud, Atle. / Social constraints in cross-boundary collaborative deer management. In: Ecology and Society. 2018 ; Vol. 23, No. 4.
@article{2391eb0ba9054297824312a6d6979d69,
title = "Social constraints in cross-boundary collaborative deer management",
abstract = "The complex interactions between different spatial, temporal, and functional scales in social-ecological systems are recognized as a key challenge in sustainable management of natural resources. We analyze scale mismatches using the example of migratory red deer (Cervus elaphus) management. Hunting practices and organization of hunting are shaped by the social and institutional context rather than the biology and space use of the species. The collaboration among landowners across property boundaries is a potential solution to address scale mismatches but a number of social constraints need to be taken into account. Based on data from a survey of attitudes and perceptions of 509 Norwegian landowners we found a number of social constraints including differing interests and objectives for deer management, land tenure arrangements, weak links between actors at different levels, lower satisfaction with current deer management and cooperation at the higher (municipality) level, information asymmetry, and different perceptions of benefits and costs of cooperation. For example, 73{\%} of respondents were satisfied with current management at the hunting field level (smallest management unit) but only 43{\%} at the municipality level, which represents unit sizes necessary for deer management at the population level. Seventy percent of respondents hunt mainly for enjoyment and meat whereas 30{\%} hunt to reduce crop damage; hence aggregation into larger management units may increase internal conflict among landowners with different objectives. Our results suggest that coordination of management across property boundaries is a more realistic aim than merging of units. Given that income from hunting in Norway is generally low, we anticipate that financial incentives are unlikely to have a large impact on landowners’ willingness to cooperate. Instead, we make suggestions for enhancing existing nested governance arrangements and institutional interplay to support scale alignment by means of developing shared management objectives, and creating learning and knowledge sharing opportunities facilitated by an intermediary.",
keywords = "cooperation, hunting, intermediary, red deer management, scale mismatch",
author = "Katrin Prager and Altea Lorenzo-Arribas and Hans Bull and {Slaaen Kvernstuen}, Mikkel and Loe, {Leif Egil} and Atle Mysterud",
note = "This study was funded by the Norwegian Research Council as part of the DeerUnit project (Grant number 230275). We are very grateful to all landowners who took part in the survey. We would also like to acknowledge comments from Vebj{\o}rn Veiberg on a previous draft.",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.5751/ES-10549-230429",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
journal = "Ecology and Society",
issn = "1708-3087",
publisher = "The Resilience Alliance",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Social constraints in cross-boundary collaborative deer management

AU - Prager, Katrin

AU - Lorenzo-Arribas, Altea

AU - Bull, Hans

AU - Slaaen Kvernstuen, Mikkel

AU - Loe, Leif Egil

AU - Mysterud, Atle

N1 - This study was funded by the Norwegian Research Council as part of the DeerUnit project (Grant number 230275). We are very grateful to all landowners who took part in the survey. We would also like to acknowledge comments from Vebjørn Veiberg on a previous draft.

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - The complex interactions between different spatial, temporal, and functional scales in social-ecological systems are recognized as a key challenge in sustainable management of natural resources. We analyze scale mismatches using the example of migratory red deer (Cervus elaphus) management. Hunting practices and organization of hunting are shaped by the social and institutional context rather than the biology and space use of the species. The collaboration among landowners across property boundaries is a potential solution to address scale mismatches but a number of social constraints need to be taken into account. Based on data from a survey of attitudes and perceptions of 509 Norwegian landowners we found a number of social constraints including differing interests and objectives for deer management, land tenure arrangements, weak links between actors at different levels, lower satisfaction with current deer management and cooperation at the higher (municipality) level, information asymmetry, and different perceptions of benefits and costs of cooperation. For example, 73% of respondents were satisfied with current management at the hunting field level (smallest management unit) but only 43% at the municipality level, which represents unit sizes necessary for deer management at the population level. Seventy percent of respondents hunt mainly for enjoyment and meat whereas 30% hunt to reduce crop damage; hence aggregation into larger management units may increase internal conflict among landowners with different objectives. Our results suggest that coordination of management across property boundaries is a more realistic aim than merging of units. Given that income from hunting in Norway is generally low, we anticipate that financial incentives are unlikely to have a large impact on landowners’ willingness to cooperate. Instead, we make suggestions for enhancing existing nested governance arrangements and institutional interplay to support scale alignment by means of developing shared management objectives, and creating learning and knowledge sharing opportunities facilitated by an intermediary.

AB - The complex interactions between different spatial, temporal, and functional scales in social-ecological systems are recognized as a key challenge in sustainable management of natural resources. We analyze scale mismatches using the example of migratory red deer (Cervus elaphus) management. Hunting practices and organization of hunting are shaped by the social and institutional context rather than the biology and space use of the species. The collaboration among landowners across property boundaries is a potential solution to address scale mismatches but a number of social constraints need to be taken into account. Based on data from a survey of attitudes and perceptions of 509 Norwegian landowners we found a number of social constraints including differing interests and objectives for deer management, land tenure arrangements, weak links between actors at different levels, lower satisfaction with current deer management and cooperation at the higher (municipality) level, information asymmetry, and different perceptions of benefits and costs of cooperation. For example, 73% of respondents were satisfied with current management at the hunting field level (smallest management unit) but only 43% at the municipality level, which represents unit sizes necessary for deer management at the population level. Seventy percent of respondents hunt mainly for enjoyment and meat whereas 30% hunt to reduce crop damage; hence aggregation into larger management units may increase internal conflict among landowners with different objectives. Our results suggest that coordination of management across property boundaries is a more realistic aim than merging of units. Given that income from hunting in Norway is generally low, we anticipate that financial incentives are unlikely to have a large impact on landowners’ willingness to cooperate. Instead, we make suggestions for enhancing existing nested governance arrangements and institutional interplay to support scale alignment by means of developing shared management objectives, and creating learning and knowledge sharing opportunities facilitated by an intermediary.

KW - cooperation

KW - hunting

KW - intermediary

KW - red deer management

KW - scale mismatch

U2 - 10.5751/ES-10549-230429

DO - 10.5751/ES-10549-230429

M3 - Article

VL - 23

JO - Ecology and Society

JF - Ecology and Society

SN - 1708-3087

IS - 4

M1 - 29

ER -