Abstract
In spite of the merits of Gallotti and Frith’s we-mode proposal of social cognition, they attempt to separate social knowing from the dynamics of social interaction in order to focus on the individual mechanisms of social cognition. We argue that this approach leads to important shortcomings: 1) it imposes an implausible dichotomy between social and non-social interaction; 2) it is circular in that it simultaneously presupposes and tries to be explanatory of social skills and does not provide a developmental story for the representational capacities underlying the we-mode; 3) it does not really go beyond a notion of ‘mirror mechanism for mental states’ as it remains vague about its embodied versus representational nature.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Journal | Trends in Cognitive Sciences |
Volume | 17 |
Issue number | 4 |
Publication status | Published - 21 May 2013 |