Social values and the corruption argument against financial incentives for healthy behaviour

Rebecca C H Brown

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)
4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Financial incentives may provide a way of reducing the burden of chronic disease by motivating people to adopt healthy behaviours. Whilst it is still uncertain how effective such incentives could be for promoting health, some argue that, even if effective, there are ethical objections which preclude their use. One such argument is made by Michael Sandel, who suggests that monetary transactions can have a corrupting effect on the norms and values which ordinarily regulate exchange and behaviour in previously non-monetised contexts. In this paper, I outline Sandel's corruption argument and consider its validity in the context of health incentives. I distinguish between two forms of corruption that are implied by Sandel's argument: efficiency corruption and value corruption. Whilst Sandel's thought-provoking discussion provides a valuable contribution to debates about health policy generally and health incentives specifically, I suggest the force of his criticism of health incentives is limited: further empirical evidence and theoretical reasoning are to support the suggestion that health incentives are an inappropriate tool for promoting health. Whilst I do not find Sandel's corruption argument compelling, this only constitutes a partial defence of health incentives, since other criticisms relating to their use may prove more successful.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)140-144
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Medical Ethics
Volume43
Issue number3
Early online date22 Feb 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2017

Fingerprint

Social Values
corruption
Motivation
incentive
Health
health
Values
criticism
Health Policy
Corruption
Incentives
health policy
transaction
Chronic Disease
Disease
efficiency

Keywords

  • behaviour modification
  • social aspects
  • health promotion
  • ethics
  • public health ethics

Cite this

Social values and the corruption argument against financial incentives for healthy behaviour. / Brown, Rebecca C H.

In: Journal of Medical Ethics, Vol. 43, No. 3, 01.03.2017, p. 140-144.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{55c7e0d6e3cf4935b4c8b0a646991941,
title = "Social values and the corruption argument against financial incentives for healthy behaviour",
abstract = "Financial incentives may provide a way of reducing the burden of chronic disease by motivating people to adopt healthy behaviours. Whilst it is still uncertain how effective such incentives could be for promoting health, some argue that, even if effective, there are ethical objections which preclude their use. One such argument is made by Michael Sandel, who suggests that monetary transactions can have a corrupting effect on the norms and values which ordinarily regulate exchange and behaviour in previously non-monetised contexts. In this paper, I outline Sandel's corruption argument and consider its validity in the context of health incentives. I distinguish between two forms of corruption that are implied by Sandel's argument: efficiency corruption and value corruption. Whilst Sandel's thought-provoking discussion provides a valuable contribution to debates about health policy generally and health incentives specifically, I suggest the force of his criticism of health incentives is limited: further empirical evidence and theoretical reasoning are to support the suggestion that health incentives are an inappropriate tool for promoting health. Whilst I do not find Sandel's corruption argument compelling, this only constitutes a partial defence of health incentives, since other criticisms relating to their use may prove more successful.",
keywords = "behaviour modification, social aspects, health promotion, ethics, public health ethics",
author = "Brown, {Rebecca C H}",
note = "Footnotes Funding This research was funded by the Centre for the Study of Incentives in Health, from a strategic award from the Wellcome Trust Biomedical Ethics Programme (PI Marteau: 086031/Z/08/Z).",
year = "2017",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1136/medethics-2016-103372",
language = "English",
volume = "43",
pages = "140--144",
journal = "Journal of Medical Ethics",
issn = "0306-6800",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Social values and the corruption argument against financial incentives for healthy behaviour

AU - Brown, Rebecca C H

N1 - Footnotes Funding This research was funded by the Centre for the Study of Incentives in Health, from a strategic award from the Wellcome Trust Biomedical Ethics Programme (PI Marteau: 086031/Z/08/Z).

PY - 2017/3/1

Y1 - 2017/3/1

N2 - Financial incentives may provide a way of reducing the burden of chronic disease by motivating people to adopt healthy behaviours. Whilst it is still uncertain how effective such incentives could be for promoting health, some argue that, even if effective, there are ethical objections which preclude their use. One such argument is made by Michael Sandel, who suggests that monetary transactions can have a corrupting effect on the norms and values which ordinarily regulate exchange and behaviour in previously non-monetised contexts. In this paper, I outline Sandel's corruption argument and consider its validity in the context of health incentives. I distinguish between two forms of corruption that are implied by Sandel's argument: efficiency corruption and value corruption. Whilst Sandel's thought-provoking discussion provides a valuable contribution to debates about health policy generally and health incentives specifically, I suggest the force of his criticism of health incentives is limited: further empirical evidence and theoretical reasoning are to support the suggestion that health incentives are an inappropriate tool for promoting health. Whilst I do not find Sandel's corruption argument compelling, this only constitutes a partial defence of health incentives, since other criticisms relating to their use may prove more successful.

AB - Financial incentives may provide a way of reducing the burden of chronic disease by motivating people to adopt healthy behaviours. Whilst it is still uncertain how effective such incentives could be for promoting health, some argue that, even if effective, there are ethical objections which preclude their use. One such argument is made by Michael Sandel, who suggests that monetary transactions can have a corrupting effect on the norms and values which ordinarily regulate exchange and behaviour in previously non-monetised contexts. In this paper, I outline Sandel's corruption argument and consider its validity in the context of health incentives. I distinguish between two forms of corruption that are implied by Sandel's argument: efficiency corruption and value corruption. Whilst Sandel's thought-provoking discussion provides a valuable contribution to debates about health policy generally and health incentives specifically, I suggest the force of his criticism of health incentives is limited: further empirical evidence and theoretical reasoning are to support the suggestion that health incentives are an inappropriate tool for promoting health. Whilst I do not find Sandel's corruption argument compelling, this only constitutes a partial defence of health incentives, since other criticisms relating to their use may prove more successful.

KW - behaviour modification

KW - social aspects

KW - health promotion

KW - ethics

KW - public health ethics

U2 - 10.1136/medethics-2016-103372

DO - 10.1136/medethics-2016-103372

M3 - Article

VL - 43

SP - 140

EP - 144

JO - Journal of Medical Ethics

JF - Journal of Medical Ethics

SN - 0306-6800

IS - 3

ER -