Socio-economic inequalities in English schooling under the Coalition Government 2010–15

Ruth Lupton, Stephanie Thomson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The reduction of socio-economic inequalities in school outcomes was a major priority of the Coalition Government in England from 2010–15. In this paper we examine the Coalition's policies and spending, including an analysis of the distributional effect of its pupil premium policy. We also look at trends in outcomes up to 2014. We find that although the pupil premium had a modest overall effect of distributing more money to schools with poorer intakes, this was nested within a wider set of policies which have disadvantaged low income families and children, and that there is evidence of socio-economic gaps widening on some indicators.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)4-20
Number of pages17
JournalLondon Review of Education
Volume13
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2015

Fingerprint

premium
coalition
pupil
coalition policy
school
economics
money
low income
trend
evidence

Keywords

  • ATTAINMENT GAP
  • INEQUALITY
  • POLICY
  • POVERTY
  • PUPIL PREMIUM
  • SCHOOL FUNDING

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences(all)

Cite this

Socio-economic inequalities in English schooling under the Coalition Government 2010–15. / Lupton, Ruth; Thomson, Stephanie.

In: London Review of Education, Vol. 13, No. 2, 09.2015, p. 4-20.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{68011a06db2c48d1a5f7925b760d1984,
title = "Socio-economic inequalities in English schooling under the Coalition Government 2010–15",
abstract = "The reduction of socio-economic inequalities in school outcomes was a major priority of the Coalition Government in England from 2010–15. In this paper we examine the Coalition's policies and spending, including an analysis of the distributional effect of its pupil premium policy. We also look at trends in outcomes up to 2014. We find that although the pupil premium had a modest overall effect of distributing more money to schools with poorer intakes, this was nested within a wider set of policies which have disadvantaged low income families and children, and that there is evidence of socio-economic gaps widening on some indicators.",
keywords = "ATTAINMENT GAP, INEQUALITY , POLICY , POVERTY, PUPIL PREMIUM, SCHOOL FUNDING",
author = "Ruth Lupton and Stephanie Thomson",
year = "2015",
month = "9",
doi = "10.18546/LRE.13.2.02",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
pages = "4--20",
journal = "London Review of Education",
issn = "1474-8479",
publisher = "University College, London Press",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Socio-economic inequalities in English schooling under the Coalition Government 2010–15

AU - Lupton, Ruth

AU - Thomson, Stephanie

PY - 2015/9

Y1 - 2015/9

N2 - The reduction of socio-economic inequalities in school outcomes was a major priority of the Coalition Government in England from 2010–15. In this paper we examine the Coalition's policies and spending, including an analysis of the distributional effect of its pupil premium policy. We also look at trends in outcomes up to 2014. We find that although the pupil premium had a modest overall effect of distributing more money to schools with poorer intakes, this was nested within a wider set of policies which have disadvantaged low income families and children, and that there is evidence of socio-economic gaps widening on some indicators.

AB - The reduction of socio-economic inequalities in school outcomes was a major priority of the Coalition Government in England from 2010–15. In this paper we examine the Coalition's policies and spending, including an analysis of the distributional effect of its pupil premium policy. We also look at trends in outcomes up to 2014. We find that although the pupil premium had a modest overall effect of distributing more money to schools with poorer intakes, this was nested within a wider set of policies which have disadvantaged low income families and children, and that there is evidence of socio-economic gaps widening on some indicators.

KW - ATTAINMENT GAP

KW - INEQUALITY

KW - POLICY

KW - POVERTY

KW - PUPIL PREMIUM

KW - SCHOOL FUNDING

U2 - 10.18546/LRE.13.2.02

DO - 10.18546/LRE.13.2.02

M3 - Article

VL - 13

SP - 4

EP - 20

JO - London Review of Education

JF - London Review of Education

SN - 1474-8479

IS - 2

ER -