Soil and tree biomass carbon sequestration potential of silvopastoral and woodland-pasture systems in North East Scotland

Marvin R Beckert, Pete Smith, Allan Lilly, Stephen J. Chapman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Managing agricultural land for carbon sequestration becomes more important with rising needs for greenhouse gas mitigation measures. Woodland establishment in upland grasslands can be a carbon sink, but soil carbon losses have also been observed. Dedicated woodland plots and silvopasture are two contrasting strategies to achieve increased carbon stocks. We compared the carbon sequestration potential of the two approaches with three tree species (Hybrid Larch, Scots Pine and Sycamore) planted on permanent pasture on an upland farm in North East Scotland, 24 years after planting. Soil organic carbon was measured in the A (~0–30 cm) and B (~30–50) horizons. The soil carbon was also fractionated into labile, protected and resistant pools. Litter layers were measured and tree biomass carbon was estimated using allometric equations. We found that total soil carbon stocks (A plus B horizon) were similar and did not differ significantly between treatments, but for both coniferous species silvopasture tended to have the greater soil carbon stock followed by woodland, whereas Sycamore had the greater stock in the woodland treatment; pasture had the least carbon stock. Woodland stored more carbon in the labile fractions and litter layer than both pasture and silvopasture of all treatments, which had similar levels of stabilized carbon. Biomass per tree was significantly greater in the silvopasture treatments for all species, but on a per hectare basis woodland stored significantly more carbon. Land management comparison shows that large proportions of grassland would need to be converted to woodland to provide similar carbon benefits as the integrative silvopastoral system.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)371-383
Number of pages13
JournalAgroforestry Systems
Volume90
Issue number3
Early online date31 Oct 2015
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2016

Fingerprint

carbon sequestration
Scotland
woodlands
woodland
pasture
pastures
carbon sinks
carbon
soil carbon
biomass
soil
B horizons
highlands
litter
grasslands
grassland
silvopastoral systems
permanent grasslands
carbon sink
greenhouse gases

Keywords

  • Carbon sequestration
  • Farm woodland
  • Silvopasture
  • Soil carbon fractionation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Agronomy and Crop Science
  • Forestry

Cite this

Soil and tree biomass carbon sequestration potential of silvopastoral and woodland-pasture systems in North East Scotland. / Beckert, Marvin R; Smith, Pete; Lilly, Allan; Chapman, Stephen J.

In: Agroforestry Systems, Vol. 90, No. 3, 06.2016, p. 371-383.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{8c9f42e6a6544e50bdff91d68f5a9459,
title = "Soil and tree biomass carbon sequestration potential of silvopastoral and woodland-pasture systems in North East Scotland",
abstract = "Managing agricultural land for carbon sequestration becomes more important with rising needs for greenhouse gas mitigation measures. Woodland establishment in upland grasslands can be a carbon sink, but soil carbon losses have also been observed. Dedicated woodland plots and silvopasture are two contrasting strategies to achieve increased carbon stocks. We compared the carbon sequestration potential of the two approaches with three tree species (Hybrid Larch, Scots Pine and Sycamore) planted on permanent pasture on an upland farm in North East Scotland, 24 years after planting. Soil organic carbon was measured in the A (~0–30 cm) and B (~30–50) horizons. The soil carbon was also fractionated into labile, protected and resistant pools. Litter layers were measured and tree biomass carbon was estimated using allometric equations. We found that total soil carbon stocks (A plus B horizon) were similar and did not differ significantly between treatments, but for both coniferous species silvopasture tended to have the greater soil carbon stock followed by woodland, whereas Sycamore had the greater stock in the woodland treatment; pasture had the least carbon stock. Woodland stored more carbon in the labile fractions and litter layer than both pasture and silvopasture of all treatments, which had similar levels of stabilized carbon. Biomass per tree was significantly greater in the silvopasture treatments for all species, but on a per hectare basis woodland stored significantly more carbon. Land management comparison shows that large proportions of grassland would need to be converted to woodland to provide similar carbon benefits as the integrative silvopastoral system.",
keywords = "Carbon sequestration, Farm woodland, Silvopasture, Soil carbon fractionation",
author = "Beckert, {Marvin R} and Pete Smith and Allan Lilly and Chapman, {Stephen J.}",
note = "Acknowledgments We thank Eileen Reid, Angela Main and Geraldine Hildbrand for advice and help with laboratory and field work.",
year = "2016",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1007/s10457-015-9860-4",
language = "English",
volume = "90",
pages = "371--383",
journal = "Agroforestry Systems",
issn = "0167-4366",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Soil and tree biomass carbon sequestration potential of silvopastoral and woodland-pasture systems in North East Scotland

AU - Beckert, Marvin R

AU - Smith, Pete

AU - Lilly, Allan

AU - Chapman, Stephen J.

N1 - Acknowledgments We thank Eileen Reid, Angela Main and Geraldine Hildbrand for advice and help with laboratory and field work.

PY - 2016/6

Y1 - 2016/6

N2 - Managing agricultural land for carbon sequestration becomes more important with rising needs for greenhouse gas mitigation measures. Woodland establishment in upland grasslands can be a carbon sink, but soil carbon losses have also been observed. Dedicated woodland plots and silvopasture are two contrasting strategies to achieve increased carbon stocks. We compared the carbon sequestration potential of the two approaches with three tree species (Hybrid Larch, Scots Pine and Sycamore) planted on permanent pasture on an upland farm in North East Scotland, 24 years after planting. Soil organic carbon was measured in the A (~0–30 cm) and B (~30–50) horizons. The soil carbon was also fractionated into labile, protected and resistant pools. Litter layers were measured and tree biomass carbon was estimated using allometric equations. We found that total soil carbon stocks (A plus B horizon) were similar and did not differ significantly between treatments, but for both coniferous species silvopasture tended to have the greater soil carbon stock followed by woodland, whereas Sycamore had the greater stock in the woodland treatment; pasture had the least carbon stock. Woodland stored more carbon in the labile fractions and litter layer than both pasture and silvopasture of all treatments, which had similar levels of stabilized carbon. Biomass per tree was significantly greater in the silvopasture treatments for all species, but on a per hectare basis woodland stored significantly more carbon. Land management comparison shows that large proportions of grassland would need to be converted to woodland to provide similar carbon benefits as the integrative silvopastoral system.

AB - Managing agricultural land for carbon sequestration becomes more important with rising needs for greenhouse gas mitigation measures. Woodland establishment in upland grasslands can be a carbon sink, but soil carbon losses have also been observed. Dedicated woodland plots and silvopasture are two contrasting strategies to achieve increased carbon stocks. We compared the carbon sequestration potential of the two approaches with three tree species (Hybrid Larch, Scots Pine and Sycamore) planted on permanent pasture on an upland farm in North East Scotland, 24 years after planting. Soil organic carbon was measured in the A (~0–30 cm) and B (~30–50) horizons. The soil carbon was also fractionated into labile, protected and resistant pools. Litter layers were measured and tree biomass carbon was estimated using allometric equations. We found that total soil carbon stocks (A plus B horizon) were similar and did not differ significantly between treatments, but for both coniferous species silvopasture tended to have the greater soil carbon stock followed by woodland, whereas Sycamore had the greater stock in the woodland treatment; pasture had the least carbon stock. Woodland stored more carbon in the labile fractions and litter layer than both pasture and silvopasture of all treatments, which had similar levels of stabilized carbon. Biomass per tree was significantly greater in the silvopasture treatments for all species, but on a per hectare basis woodland stored significantly more carbon. Land management comparison shows that large proportions of grassland would need to be converted to woodland to provide similar carbon benefits as the integrative silvopastoral system.

KW - Carbon sequestration

KW - Farm woodland

KW - Silvopasture

KW - Soil carbon fractionation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84945581958&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10457-015-9860-4

DO - 10.1007/s10457-015-9860-4

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84945581958

VL - 90

SP - 371

EP - 383

JO - Agroforestry Systems

JF - Agroforestry Systems

SN - 0167-4366

IS - 3

ER -