Some witnesses are better than others

Stephen Darling, Douglas Martin, Jens Hinrich Hellmann, Amina Memon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper reports a single study in which individual differences in visual processing were assessed in comparison with participants' ability to identify a culprit from a lineup. There were two parts to the study, separated by several weeks. In the first part, participants were asked to report on the global and local aspects of stimuli (first used by Navon (1977)) comprising large letters made up of small individual letters. Measures were taken of the degree of interference caused when the letters conflicted (e.g. a large letter P composed of small letter Ss). In the second part of the study, participants viewed a video of a crime, and subsequently attempted to identify the culprit from a lineup. We found that there was an association between the interference caused by conflicting global information when participants were reporting local letters, and identification performance. Those participants that were most susceptible to global interference identified the culprit more often than those who were the least susceptible to conflicting global information. These results establish a relationship between an individual differences measure of global/local processing and eyewitness recognition performance, suggesting that participants with a relative global processing bias might make better eyewitnesses. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)369-373
Number of pages5
JournalPersonality and Individual Differences
Volume47
Issue number4
Early online date9 May 2009
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2009

Keywords

  • Identification procedures
  • Line-up
  • Global and local processing
  • Navon task
  • Individual differences
  • Face recognition
  • OWN-RACE BIAS
  • FACE RECOGNITION
  • EYEWITNESS IDENTIFICATION
  • PROCESSING BIAS
  • PERFORMANCE
  • ORIENTATION
  • PRECEDENCE
  • LINEUPS

Cite this

Some witnesses are better than others. / Darling, Stephen; Martin, Douglas; Hellmann, Jens Hinrich; Memon, Amina.

In: Personality and Individual Differences, Vol. 47, No. 4, 09.2009, p. 369-373.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Darling, Stephen ; Martin, Douglas ; Hellmann, Jens Hinrich ; Memon, Amina. / Some witnesses are better than others. In: Personality and Individual Differences. 2009 ; Vol. 47, No. 4. pp. 369-373.
@article{9646397fbd374b75b4339797406c1396,
title = "Some witnesses are better than others",
abstract = "This paper reports a single study in which individual differences in visual processing were assessed in comparison with participants' ability to identify a culprit from a lineup. There were two parts to the study, separated by several weeks. In the first part, participants were asked to report on the global and local aspects of stimuli (first used by Navon (1977)) comprising large letters made up of small individual letters. Measures were taken of the degree of interference caused when the letters conflicted (e.g. a large letter P composed of small letter Ss). In the second part of the study, participants viewed a video of a crime, and subsequently attempted to identify the culprit from a lineup. We found that there was an association between the interference caused by conflicting global information when participants were reporting local letters, and identification performance. Those participants that were most susceptible to global interference identified the culprit more often than those who were the least susceptible to conflicting global information. These results establish a relationship between an individual differences measure of global/local processing and eyewitness recognition performance, suggesting that participants with a relative global processing bias might make better eyewitnesses. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.",
keywords = "Identification procedures, Line-up, Global and local processing, Navon task, Individual differences, Face recognition, OWN-RACE BIAS, FACE RECOGNITION, EYEWITNESS IDENTIFICATION, PROCESSING BIAS, PERFORMANCE, ORIENTATION, PRECEDENCE, LINEUPS",
author = "Stephen Darling and Douglas Martin and Hellmann, {Jens Hinrich} and Amina Memon",
year = "2009",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1016/j.paid.2009.04.010",
language = "English",
volume = "47",
pages = "369--373",
journal = "Personality and Individual Differences",
issn = "0191-8869",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Some witnesses are better than others

AU - Darling, Stephen

AU - Martin, Douglas

AU - Hellmann, Jens Hinrich

AU - Memon, Amina

PY - 2009/9

Y1 - 2009/9

N2 - This paper reports a single study in which individual differences in visual processing were assessed in comparison with participants' ability to identify a culprit from a lineup. There were two parts to the study, separated by several weeks. In the first part, participants were asked to report on the global and local aspects of stimuli (first used by Navon (1977)) comprising large letters made up of small individual letters. Measures were taken of the degree of interference caused when the letters conflicted (e.g. a large letter P composed of small letter Ss). In the second part of the study, participants viewed a video of a crime, and subsequently attempted to identify the culprit from a lineup. We found that there was an association between the interference caused by conflicting global information when participants were reporting local letters, and identification performance. Those participants that were most susceptible to global interference identified the culprit more often than those who were the least susceptible to conflicting global information. These results establish a relationship between an individual differences measure of global/local processing and eyewitness recognition performance, suggesting that participants with a relative global processing bias might make better eyewitnesses. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

AB - This paper reports a single study in which individual differences in visual processing were assessed in comparison with participants' ability to identify a culprit from a lineup. There were two parts to the study, separated by several weeks. In the first part, participants were asked to report on the global and local aspects of stimuli (first used by Navon (1977)) comprising large letters made up of small individual letters. Measures were taken of the degree of interference caused when the letters conflicted (e.g. a large letter P composed of small letter Ss). In the second part of the study, participants viewed a video of a crime, and subsequently attempted to identify the culprit from a lineup. We found that there was an association between the interference caused by conflicting global information when participants were reporting local letters, and identification performance. Those participants that were most susceptible to global interference identified the culprit more often than those who were the least susceptible to conflicting global information. These results establish a relationship between an individual differences measure of global/local processing and eyewitness recognition performance, suggesting that participants with a relative global processing bias might make better eyewitnesses. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

KW - Identification procedures

KW - Line-up

KW - Global and local processing

KW - Navon task

KW - Individual differences

KW - Face recognition

KW - OWN-RACE BIAS

KW - FACE RECOGNITION

KW - EYEWITNESS IDENTIFICATION

KW - PROCESSING BIAS

KW - PERFORMANCE

KW - ORIENTATION

KW - PRECEDENCE

KW - LINEUPS

U2 - 10.1016/j.paid.2009.04.010

DO - 10.1016/j.paid.2009.04.010

M3 - Article

VL - 47

SP - 369

EP - 373

JO - Personality and Individual Differences

JF - Personality and Individual Differences

SN - 0191-8869

IS - 4

ER -