Spatial analyses of wildlife contact networks

Stephen Davis, Babak Abbasi, Shrupa Shah, Sandra Telfer, Mike Begon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

22 Citations (Scopus)
3 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Datasets from which wildlife contact networks of epidemiological importance can be inferred are becoming increasingly common. A largely unexplored facet of these data is finding evidence of spatial constraints on who has contact with whom, despite theoretical epidemiologists having long realized spatial constraints can play a critical role in infectious disease dynamics. A graph dissimilarity measure is proposed to quantify how close an observed contact network is to being purely spatial whereby its edges are completely determined by the spatial arrangement of its nodes. Statistical techniques are also used to fit a series of mechanistic models for contact rates between individuals to the binary edge data representing presence or absence of observed contact. These are the basis for a second measure that quantifies the extent to which contacts are being mediated by distance. We apply these methods to a set of 128 contact networks of field voles (Microtus agrestis) inferred from mark-recapture data collected over 7 years and from four sites. Large fluctuations in vole abundance allow us to demonstrate that the networks become increasingly similar to spatial proximity graphs as vole density increases. The average number of contacts, 〈k〉, was (i) positively correlated with vole density across the range of observed densities and (ii) for two of the four sites a saturating function of density. The implications for pathogen persistence in wildlife may be that persistence is relatively unaffected by fluctuations in host density because at low density 〈k〉 is low but hosts move more freely, and at high density 〈k〉 is high but transmission is hampered by local build-up of infected or recovered animals.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-11
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of the Royal Society Interface
Volume12
Issue number102
Early online date19 Nov 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 6 Jan 2015

Fingerprint

Arvicolinae
Spatial Analysis
Pathogens
Animals
Communicable Diseases

Keywords

  • dissimilarity measure
  • epidemiology
  • field vole
  • graph
  • mathematical model
  • Microtus agrestis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Spatial analyses of wildlife contact networks. / Davis, Stephen; Abbasi, Babak; Shah, Shrupa; Telfer, Sandra; Begon, Mike.

In: Journal of the Royal Society Interface, Vol. 12, No. 102, 06.01.2015, p. 1-11.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Davis, Stephen ; Abbasi, Babak ; Shah, Shrupa ; Telfer, Sandra ; Begon, Mike. / Spatial analyses of wildlife contact networks. In: Journal of the Royal Society Interface. 2015 ; Vol. 12, No. 102. pp. 1-11.
@article{44cdd152bcf64666a27cf5a263593487,
title = "Spatial analyses of wildlife contact networks",
abstract = "Datasets from which wildlife contact networks of epidemiological importance can be inferred are becoming increasingly common. A largely unexplored facet of these data is finding evidence of spatial constraints on who has contact with whom, despite theoretical epidemiologists having long realized spatial constraints can play a critical role in infectious disease dynamics. A graph dissimilarity measure is proposed to quantify how close an observed contact network is to being purely spatial whereby its edges are completely determined by the spatial arrangement of its nodes. Statistical techniques are also used to fit a series of mechanistic models for contact rates between individuals to the binary edge data representing presence or absence of observed contact. These are the basis for a second measure that quantifies the extent to which contacts are being mediated by distance. We apply these methods to a set of 128 contact networks of field voles (Microtus agrestis) inferred from mark-recapture data collected over 7 years and from four sites. Large fluctuations in vole abundance allow us to demonstrate that the networks become increasingly similar to spatial proximity graphs as vole density increases. The average number of contacts, 〈k〉, was (i) positively correlated with vole density across the range of observed densities and (ii) for two of the four sites a saturating function of density. The implications for pathogen persistence in wildlife may be that persistence is relatively unaffected by fluctuations in host density because at low density 〈k〉 is low but hosts move more freely, and at high density 〈k〉 is high but transmission is hampered by local build-up of infected or recovered animals.",
keywords = "dissimilarity measure, epidemiology, field vole, graph, mathematical model, Microtus agrestis",
author = "Stephen Davis and Babak Abbasi and Shrupa Shah and Sandra Telfer and Mike Begon",
note = "We thank Kathy Horadam for useful discussions about the graph dissimilarity measures and Meggan Craft for reading an early draft of the manuscript and for her helpful advice and encouragement.",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "6",
doi = "10.1098/rsif.2014.1004",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "1--11",
journal = "Journal of the Royal Society Interface",
issn = "1742-5689",
publisher = "Royal Society of London",
number = "102",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Spatial analyses of wildlife contact networks

AU - Davis, Stephen

AU - Abbasi, Babak

AU - Shah, Shrupa

AU - Telfer, Sandra

AU - Begon, Mike

N1 - We thank Kathy Horadam for useful discussions about the graph dissimilarity measures and Meggan Craft for reading an early draft of the manuscript and for her helpful advice and encouragement.

PY - 2015/1/6

Y1 - 2015/1/6

N2 - Datasets from which wildlife contact networks of epidemiological importance can be inferred are becoming increasingly common. A largely unexplored facet of these data is finding evidence of spatial constraints on who has contact with whom, despite theoretical epidemiologists having long realized spatial constraints can play a critical role in infectious disease dynamics. A graph dissimilarity measure is proposed to quantify how close an observed contact network is to being purely spatial whereby its edges are completely determined by the spatial arrangement of its nodes. Statistical techniques are also used to fit a series of mechanistic models for contact rates between individuals to the binary edge data representing presence or absence of observed contact. These are the basis for a second measure that quantifies the extent to which contacts are being mediated by distance. We apply these methods to a set of 128 contact networks of field voles (Microtus agrestis) inferred from mark-recapture data collected over 7 years and from four sites. Large fluctuations in vole abundance allow us to demonstrate that the networks become increasingly similar to spatial proximity graphs as vole density increases. The average number of contacts, 〈k〉, was (i) positively correlated with vole density across the range of observed densities and (ii) for two of the four sites a saturating function of density. The implications for pathogen persistence in wildlife may be that persistence is relatively unaffected by fluctuations in host density because at low density 〈k〉 is low but hosts move more freely, and at high density 〈k〉 is high but transmission is hampered by local build-up of infected or recovered animals.

AB - Datasets from which wildlife contact networks of epidemiological importance can be inferred are becoming increasingly common. A largely unexplored facet of these data is finding evidence of spatial constraints on who has contact with whom, despite theoretical epidemiologists having long realized spatial constraints can play a critical role in infectious disease dynamics. A graph dissimilarity measure is proposed to quantify how close an observed contact network is to being purely spatial whereby its edges are completely determined by the spatial arrangement of its nodes. Statistical techniques are also used to fit a series of mechanistic models for contact rates between individuals to the binary edge data representing presence or absence of observed contact. These are the basis for a second measure that quantifies the extent to which contacts are being mediated by distance. We apply these methods to a set of 128 contact networks of field voles (Microtus agrestis) inferred from mark-recapture data collected over 7 years and from four sites. Large fluctuations in vole abundance allow us to demonstrate that the networks become increasingly similar to spatial proximity graphs as vole density increases. The average number of contacts, 〈k〉, was (i) positively correlated with vole density across the range of observed densities and (ii) for two of the four sites a saturating function of density. The implications for pathogen persistence in wildlife may be that persistence is relatively unaffected by fluctuations in host density because at low density 〈k〉 is low but hosts move more freely, and at high density 〈k〉 is high but transmission is hampered by local build-up of infected or recovered animals.

KW - dissimilarity measure

KW - epidemiology

KW - field vole

KW - graph

KW - mathematical model

KW - Microtus agrestis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84964314672&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1098/rsif.2014.1004

DO - 10.1098/rsif.2014.1004

M3 - Article

C2 - 25411407

AN - SCOPUS:84964314672

VL - 12

SP - 1

EP - 11

JO - Journal of the Royal Society Interface

JF - Journal of the Royal Society Interface

SN - 1742-5689

IS - 102

ER -