Speaking up about safety concerns

multi-setting qualitative study of patients' views and experiences

PIPS (Patient Involvement in Patient Safety) Group

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

69 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: To explore patients' and family members' experiences of and views about speaking up about safety concerns at the point of care.

Design: Qualitative study using 71 individual interviews and 12 focus group discussions.

Participants and settings: People with recent experience of one of five conditions or interventions associated with different safety problems (childhood asthma, diabetes, breast cancer, elective joint replacement and severe and enduring mental health problems) and people who had lodged concerns with healthcare providers were recruited from both NHS services (primary and secondary care) and patient support organisations.

Findings: Participants had identified various safety concerns in the course of their healthcare and had sometimes spoken up about these as they occurred. Their inclination and ability to speak up were apparently variously shaped by their assessments of the gravity of the threat of harm, the relative importance of their concern given other patients' needs and staff workloads and priorities, their confidence about their grounds for concern, roles and responsibilities and the likely consequences of speaking up. These assessments were pervasively influenced by the way healthcare staff behaved and related to them. People who had spoken up about concerns reported diverse responses from health professionals. Some responses averted harm or provided welcome reassurance, but others exacerbated anxieties and possibly contributed to patient harm.

Conclusion: The potential for patients to contribute to their safety by speaking up about their concerns depends heavily on the quality of patient–professional interactions and relationships.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere33
Number of pages7
JournalBMJ Quality & Safety
Volume19
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2010

Fingerprint

Safety
Replacement Arthroplasties
Point-of-Care Systems
Patient Harm
Delivery of Health Care
Secondary Care
Aptitude
Gravitation
Workload
Focus Groups
Health Personnel
Primary Health Care
Mental Health
Asthma
Anxiety
Organizations
Interviews
Breast Neoplasms
Health

Cite this

Speaking up about safety concerns : multi-setting qualitative study of patients' views and experiences. / PIPS (Patient Involvement in Patient Safety) Group.

In: BMJ Quality & Safety, Vol. 19, No. 6, e33, 12.2010.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

PIPS (Patient Involvement in Patient Safety) Group. / Speaking up about safety concerns : multi-setting qualitative study of patients' views and experiences. In: BMJ Quality & Safety. 2010 ; Vol. 19, No. 6.
@article{d23ad8b7b59c4780a013a2dec71ad147,
title = "Speaking up about safety concerns: multi-setting qualitative study of patients' views and experiences",
abstract = "Objectives: To explore patients' and family members' experiences of and views about speaking up about safety concerns at the point of care.Design: Qualitative study using 71 individual interviews and 12 focus group discussions.Participants and settings: People with recent experience of one of five conditions or interventions associated with different safety problems (childhood asthma, diabetes, breast cancer, elective joint replacement and severe and enduring mental health problems) and people who had lodged concerns with healthcare providers were recruited from both NHS services (primary and secondary care) and patient support organisations.Findings: Participants had identified various safety concerns in the course of their healthcare and had sometimes spoken up about these as they occurred. Their inclination and ability to speak up were apparently variously shaped by their assessments of the gravity of the threat of harm, the relative importance of their concern given other patients' needs and staff workloads and priorities, their confidence about their grounds for concern, roles and responsibilities and the likely consequences of speaking up. These assessments were pervasively influenced by the way healthcare staff behaved and related to them. People who had spoken up about concerns reported diverse responses from health professionals. Some responses averted harm or provided welcome reassurance, but others exacerbated anxieties and possibly contributed to patient harm.Conclusion: The potential for patients to contribute to their safety by speaking up about their concerns depends heavily on the quality of patient–professional interactions and relationships.",
author = "Entwistle, {Vikki A} and Dorothy McCaughan and Watt, {Ian S} and Yvonne Birks and Jill Hall and Maggie Peat and Brian Williams and John Wright and {PIPS (Patient Involvement in Patient Safety) Group}",
year = "2010",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1136/qshc.2009.039743",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
journal = "BMJ Quality & Safety",
issn = "2044-5415",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Speaking up about safety concerns

T2 - multi-setting qualitative study of patients' views and experiences

AU - Entwistle, Vikki A

AU - McCaughan, Dorothy

AU - Watt, Ian S

AU - Birks, Yvonne

AU - Hall, Jill

AU - Peat, Maggie

AU - Williams, Brian

AU - Wright, John

AU - PIPS (Patient Involvement in Patient Safety) Group

PY - 2010/12

Y1 - 2010/12

N2 - Objectives: To explore patients' and family members' experiences of and views about speaking up about safety concerns at the point of care.Design: Qualitative study using 71 individual interviews and 12 focus group discussions.Participants and settings: People with recent experience of one of five conditions or interventions associated with different safety problems (childhood asthma, diabetes, breast cancer, elective joint replacement and severe and enduring mental health problems) and people who had lodged concerns with healthcare providers were recruited from both NHS services (primary and secondary care) and patient support organisations.Findings: Participants had identified various safety concerns in the course of their healthcare and had sometimes spoken up about these as they occurred. Their inclination and ability to speak up were apparently variously shaped by their assessments of the gravity of the threat of harm, the relative importance of their concern given other patients' needs and staff workloads and priorities, their confidence about their grounds for concern, roles and responsibilities and the likely consequences of speaking up. These assessments were pervasively influenced by the way healthcare staff behaved and related to them. People who had spoken up about concerns reported diverse responses from health professionals. Some responses averted harm or provided welcome reassurance, but others exacerbated anxieties and possibly contributed to patient harm.Conclusion: The potential for patients to contribute to their safety by speaking up about their concerns depends heavily on the quality of patient–professional interactions and relationships.

AB - Objectives: To explore patients' and family members' experiences of and views about speaking up about safety concerns at the point of care.Design: Qualitative study using 71 individual interviews and 12 focus group discussions.Participants and settings: People with recent experience of one of five conditions or interventions associated with different safety problems (childhood asthma, diabetes, breast cancer, elective joint replacement and severe and enduring mental health problems) and people who had lodged concerns with healthcare providers were recruited from both NHS services (primary and secondary care) and patient support organisations.Findings: Participants had identified various safety concerns in the course of their healthcare and had sometimes spoken up about these as they occurred. Their inclination and ability to speak up were apparently variously shaped by their assessments of the gravity of the threat of harm, the relative importance of their concern given other patients' needs and staff workloads and priorities, their confidence about their grounds for concern, roles and responsibilities and the likely consequences of speaking up. These assessments were pervasively influenced by the way healthcare staff behaved and related to them. People who had spoken up about concerns reported diverse responses from health professionals. Some responses averted harm or provided welcome reassurance, but others exacerbated anxieties and possibly contributed to patient harm.Conclusion: The potential for patients to contribute to their safety by speaking up about their concerns depends heavily on the quality of patient–professional interactions and relationships.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78650341326&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/qshc.2009.039743

DO - 10.1136/qshc.2009.039743

M3 - Article

VL - 19

JO - BMJ Quality & Safety

JF - BMJ Quality & Safety

SN - 2044-5415

IS - 6

M1 - e33

ER -