Special access programs warrant further critical attention: authors' response to open peer commentaries on "ethical justifications for access to unapproved medical interventions: an argument for (limited) patient obligations"

Mary Jean Walker, Wendy A Rogers, Vikki Entwistle

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)W1-W2
Number of pages2
JournalAmerican Journal of Bioethics
Volume14
Issue number11
Early online date17 Oct 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2014

Cite this

@article{ffb247a852594d3b9b5cfcf8df464c55,
title = "Special access programs warrant further critical attention: authors' response to open peer commentaries on {"}ethical justifications for access to unapproved medical interventions: an argument for (limited) patient obligations{"}",
author = "Walker, {Mary Jean} and Rogers, {Wendy A} and Vikki Entwistle",
year = "2014",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1080/15265161.2014.964558",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "W1--W2",
journal = "American Journal of Bioethics",
issn = "1526-5161",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Special access programs warrant further critical attention

T2 - authors' response to open peer commentaries on "ethical justifications for access to unapproved medical interventions: an argument for (limited) patient obligations"

AU - Walker, Mary Jean

AU - Rogers, Wendy A

AU - Entwistle, Vikki

PY - 2014/11

Y1 - 2014/11

U2 - 10.1080/15265161.2014.964558

DO - 10.1080/15265161.2014.964558

M3 - Article

C2 - 25325817

VL - 14

SP - W1-W2

JO - American Journal of Bioethics

JF - American Journal of Bioethics

SN - 1526-5161

IS - 11

ER -