Specification of the utility function in discrete choice experiments

Marjon Van Der Pol, Gillian Currie, Seija Kromm, Mandy Ryan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The specification of the utility function has received limited attention within the discrete choice experiment (DCE) literature. This lack of investigation is surprising given that evidence from the contingent valuation literature suggests that welfare estimates are sensitive to different specifications of the utility function. OBJECTIVE: This study investigates the effect of different specifications of the utility function on results within a DCE. METHODS: The DCE elicited the public's preferences for waiting time for hip and knee replacement and estimated willingness to wait (WTW). RESULTS: The results showed that the WTW for the different patient profiles varied considerably across the three different specifications of the utility function. Assuming a linear utility function led to much higher estimates of marginal rates of substitution (WTWs) than with nonlinear specifications. The goodness-of-fit measures indicated that nonlinear specifications were superior.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)297-301
Number of pages5
JournalValue in Health
Volume17
Issue number2
Early online date15 Mar 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2014

Fingerprint

Hip
Knee

Keywords

  • discrete choice experiments
  • specification of utility function

Cite this

Specification of the utility function in discrete choice experiments. / Van Der Pol, Marjon; Currie, Gillian; Kromm, Seija; Ryan, Mandy.

In: Value in Health, Vol. 17, No. 2, 03.2014, p. 297-301.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Van Der Pol, Marjon ; Currie, Gillian ; Kromm, Seija ; Ryan, Mandy. / Specification of the utility function in discrete choice experiments. In: Value in Health. 2014 ; Vol. 17, No. 2. pp. 297-301.
@article{e8e9681591364265aa665168382db46e,
title = "Specification of the utility function in discrete choice experiments",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: The specification of the utility function has received limited attention within the discrete choice experiment (DCE) literature. This lack of investigation is surprising given that evidence from the contingent valuation literature suggests that welfare estimates are sensitive to different specifications of the utility function. OBJECTIVE: This study investigates the effect of different specifications of the utility function on results within a DCE. METHODS: The DCE elicited the public's preferences for waiting time for hip and knee replacement and estimated willingness to wait (WTW). RESULTS: The results showed that the WTW for the different patient profiles varied considerably across the three different specifications of the utility function. Assuming a linear utility function led to much higher estimates of marginal rates of substitution (WTWs) than with nonlinear specifications. The goodness-of-fit measures indicated that nonlinear specifications were superior.",
keywords = "discrete choice experiments, specification of utility function",
author = "{Van Der Pol}, Marjon and Gillian Currie and Seija Kromm and Mandy Ryan",
year = "2014",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1016/j.jval.2013.11.009",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "297--301",
journal = "Value in Health",
issn = "1098-3015",
publisher = "ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Specification of the utility function in discrete choice experiments

AU - Van Der Pol, Marjon

AU - Currie, Gillian

AU - Kromm, Seija

AU - Ryan, Mandy

PY - 2014/3

Y1 - 2014/3

N2 - BACKGROUND: The specification of the utility function has received limited attention within the discrete choice experiment (DCE) literature. This lack of investigation is surprising given that evidence from the contingent valuation literature suggests that welfare estimates are sensitive to different specifications of the utility function. OBJECTIVE: This study investigates the effect of different specifications of the utility function on results within a DCE. METHODS: The DCE elicited the public's preferences for waiting time for hip and knee replacement and estimated willingness to wait (WTW). RESULTS: The results showed that the WTW for the different patient profiles varied considerably across the three different specifications of the utility function. Assuming a linear utility function led to much higher estimates of marginal rates of substitution (WTWs) than with nonlinear specifications. The goodness-of-fit measures indicated that nonlinear specifications were superior.

AB - BACKGROUND: The specification of the utility function has received limited attention within the discrete choice experiment (DCE) literature. This lack of investigation is surprising given that evidence from the contingent valuation literature suggests that welfare estimates are sensitive to different specifications of the utility function. OBJECTIVE: This study investigates the effect of different specifications of the utility function on results within a DCE. METHODS: The DCE elicited the public's preferences for waiting time for hip and knee replacement and estimated willingness to wait (WTW). RESULTS: The results showed that the WTW for the different patient profiles varied considerably across the three different specifications of the utility function. Assuming a linear utility function led to much higher estimates of marginal rates of substitution (WTWs) than with nonlinear specifications. The goodness-of-fit measures indicated that nonlinear specifications were superior.

KW - discrete choice experiments

KW - specification of utility function

U2 - 10.1016/j.jval.2013.11.009

DO - 10.1016/j.jval.2013.11.009

M3 - Article

VL - 17

SP - 297

EP - 301

JO - Value in Health

JF - Value in Health

SN - 1098-3015

IS - 2

ER -