Spiritual care training and the GP curriculum

where to now?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This article examines the place of spirituality in medical education, with special reference to primary care. It highlights evidence of current discrepancies and problems with spiritual care in general practice, demonstrating that GPs do not have a common approach or set of competencies. The authors illuminate the fact that medical education teaches spirituality sporadically and largely through optional and non-embedded learning. This and the general paradigm and culture of medical education may actually impair doctors’ ability to understand spirituality and integrate this in practice. The authors critique philosophical limitations in the Royal College of GPs’ curriculum statements on spirituality and foreground more general problems with the current philosophy of science on which primary care is based. Consideration is given to retracting or reducing claims to address spirituality in primary care before solutions to these issues are put forward. Potential solutions proposed include a shift to a broader philosophical framework, such as “critical realism”, and the use of alternative learning approaches such as transformational learning.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)194-197
Number of pages4
JournalEducation for Primary Care
Volume30
Issue number4
Early online date17 Jul 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Fingerprint

Spirituality
Curriculum
Medical Education
Primary Health Care
Learning
Aptitude
General Practice

Keywords

  • Medical Education
  • Spirituality
  • Primary care
  • Philosophy of science

Cite this

@article{619f2040a33c4a09aeb54febb0d6554f,
title = "Spiritual care training and the GP curriculum: where to now?",
abstract = "This article examines the place of spirituality in medical education, with special reference to primary care. It highlights evidence of current discrepancies and problems with spiritual care in general practice, demonstrating that GPs do not have a common approach or set of competencies. The authors illuminate the fact that medical education teaches spirituality sporadically and largely through optional and non-embedded learning. This and the general paradigm and culture of medical education may actually impair doctors’ ability to understand spirituality and integrate this in practice. The authors critique philosophical limitations in the Royal College of GPs’ curriculum statements on spirituality and foreground more general problems with the current philosophy of science on which primary care is based. Consideration is given to retracting or reducing claims to address spirituality in primary care before solutions to these issues are put forward. Potential solutions proposed include a shift to a broader philosophical framework, such as “critical realism”, and the use of alternative learning approaches such as transformational learning.",
keywords = "Medical Education, Spirituality, Primary care, Philosophy of science",
author = "Alistair Appleby and John Swinton and Philip Wilson",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1080/14739879.2019.1600383",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
pages = "194--197",
journal = "Education for Primary Care",
issn = "1473-9879",
publisher = "Radcliffe Publishing Ltd.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Spiritual care training and the GP curriculum

T2 - where to now?

AU - Appleby, Alistair

AU - Swinton, John

AU - Wilson, Philip

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - This article examines the place of spirituality in medical education, with special reference to primary care. It highlights evidence of current discrepancies and problems with spiritual care in general practice, demonstrating that GPs do not have a common approach or set of competencies. The authors illuminate the fact that medical education teaches spirituality sporadically and largely through optional and non-embedded learning. This and the general paradigm and culture of medical education may actually impair doctors’ ability to understand spirituality and integrate this in practice. The authors critique philosophical limitations in the Royal College of GPs’ curriculum statements on spirituality and foreground more general problems with the current philosophy of science on which primary care is based. Consideration is given to retracting or reducing claims to address spirituality in primary care before solutions to these issues are put forward. Potential solutions proposed include a shift to a broader philosophical framework, such as “critical realism”, and the use of alternative learning approaches such as transformational learning.

AB - This article examines the place of spirituality in medical education, with special reference to primary care. It highlights evidence of current discrepancies and problems with spiritual care in general practice, demonstrating that GPs do not have a common approach or set of competencies. The authors illuminate the fact that medical education teaches spirituality sporadically and largely through optional and non-embedded learning. This and the general paradigm and culture of medical education may actually impair doctors’ ability to understand spirituality and integrate this in practice. The authors critique philosophical limitations in the Royal College of GPs’ curriculum statements on spirituality and foreground more general problems with the current philosophy of science on which primary care is based. Consideration is given to retracting or reducing claims to address spirituality in primary care before solutions to these issues are put forward. Potential solutions proposed include a shift to a broader philosophical framework, such as “critical realism”, and the use of alternative learning approaches such as transformational learning.

KW - Medical Education

KW - Spirituality

KW - Primary care

KW - Philosophy of science

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/spiritual-care-training-gp-curriculum-now

UR - https://doi.org/10.1080/14739879.2019.1600383

U2 - 10.1080/14739879.2019.1600383

DO - 10.1080/14739879.2019.1600383

M3 - Article

VL - 30

SP - 194

EP - 197

JO - Education for Primary Care

JF - Education for Primary Care

SN - 1473-9879

IS - 4

ER -