Staggered multi-site low-frequency electrostimulation effectively induces locomotor patterns in the isolated rat spinal cord

F. Dose, R. Deumens, P. Forget, G. Taccola (Corresponding Author)

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Study design:
Experimental animal study.

Objectives:
Epidural stimulation has been used to activate locomotor patterns after spinal injury and typically employs synchronous trains of high-frequency stimuli delivered directly to the dorsal cord, thereby recruiting multiple afferent nerve roots. Here we investigate how spinal locomotor networks integrate multi-site afferent input and address whether frequency coding is more important than amplitude to activate locomotor patterns.

Setting:
Italy and Belgium.

Methods:
To investigate the importance of input intensity and frequency in eliciting locomotor activity, we used isolated neonatal rat spinal cords to record episodes of fictive locomotion (FL) induced by electrical stimulation of single and multiple dorsal roots (DRs), employing different stimulating protocols.

Results:
FL was efficiently induced through staggered delivery (delays 0.5 to 2 s) of low-frequency pulse trains (0.33 and 0.67 Hz) to three DRs at intensities sufficient to activate ventral root reflexes. Delivery of the same trains to a single DR or synchronously to multiple DRs remained ineffective. Multi-site staggered trains were more efficient than randomized pulse delivery. Weak trains simultaneously delivered to DRs failed to elicit FL. Locomotor rhythm resetting occurred with single pulses applied to various distant DRs.

Conclusion:
Electrical stimulation recruited spinal networks that generate locomotor programs when pulses were delivered to multiple sites at low frequency. This finding might help devising new protocols to optimize the increasingly more common use of epidural implantable arrays to treat spinal dysfunctions.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)93-101
Number of pages9
JournalSpinal Cord
Volume54
Early online date23 Jun 2015
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2016

Fingerprint

Spinal Nerve Roots
Spinal Cord
Locomotion
Electric Stimulation
Spinal Injuries
Belgium
Italy
Reflex
Research Design

Cite this

Staggered multi-site low-frequency electrostimulation effectively induces locomotor patterns in the isolated rat spinal cord. / Dose, F.; Deumens, R.; Forget, P.; Taccola, G. (Corresponding Author).

In: Spinal Cord, Vol. 54, 02.2016, p. 93-101.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5263dc42f51b4a5ea2baa27517e8499d,
title = "Staggered multi-site low-frequency electrostimulation effectively induces locomotor patterns in the isolated rat spinal cord",
abstract = "Study design:Experimental animal study.Objectives:Epidural stimulation has been used to activate locomotor patterns after spinal injury and typically employs synchronous trains of high-frequency stimuli delivered directly to the dorsal cord, thereby recruiting multiple afferent nerve roots. Here we investigate how spinal locomotor networks integrate multi-site afferent input and address whether frequency coding is more important than amplitude to activate locomotor patterns.Setting:Italy and Belgium.Methods:To investigate the importance of input intensity and frequency in eliciting locomotor activity, we used isolated neonatal rat spinal cords to record episodes of fictive locomotion (FL) induced by electrical stimulation of single and multiple dorsal roots (DRs), employing different stimulating protocols.Results:FL was efficiently induced through staggered delivery (delays 0.5 to 2 s) of low-frequency pulse trains (0.33 and 0.67 Hz) to three DRs at intensities sufficient to activate ventral root reflexes. Delivery of the same trains to a single DR or synchronously to multiple DRs remained ineffective. Multi-site staggered trains were more efficient than randomized pulse delivery. Weak trains simultaneously delivered to DRs failed to elicit FL. Locomotor rhythm resetting occurred with single pulses applied to various distant DRs.Conclusion:Electrical stimulation recruited spinal networks that generate locomotor programs when pulses were delivered to multiple sites at low frequency. This finding might help devising new protocols to optimize the increasingly more common use of epidural implantable arrays to treat spinal dysfunctions.",
author = "F. Dose and R. Deumens and P. Forget and G. Taccola",
year = "2016",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1038/sc.2015.106",
language = "English",
volume = "54",
pages = "93--101",
journal = "Spinal Cord",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Staggered multi-site low-frequency electrostimulation effectively induces locomotor patterns in the isolated rat spinal cord

AU - Dose, F.

AU - Deumens, R.

AU - Forget, P.

AU - Taccola, G.

PY - 2016/2

Y1 - 2016/2

N2 - Study design:Experimental animal study.Objectives:Epidural stimulation has been used to activate locomotor patterns after spinal injury and typically employs synchronous trains of high-frequency stimuli delivered directly to the dorsal cord, thereby recruiting multiple afferent nerve roots. Here we investigate how spinal locomotor networks integrate multi-site afferent input and address whether frequency coding is more important than amplitude to activate locomotor patterns.Setting:Italy and Belgium.Methods:To investigate the importance of input intensity and frequency in eliciting locomotor activity, we used isolated neonatal rat spinal cords to record episodes of fictive locomotion (FL) induced by electrical stimulation of single and multiple dorsal roots (DRs), employing different stimulating protocols.Results:FL was efficiently induced through staggered delivery (delays 0.5 to 2 s) of low-frequency pulse trains (0.33 and 0.67 Hz) to three DRs at intensities sufficient to activate ventral root reflexes. Delivery of the same trains to a single DR or synchronously to multiple DRs remained ineffective. Multi-site staggered trains were more efficient than randomized pulse delivery. Weak trains simultaneously delivered to DRs failed to elicit FL. Locomotor rhythm resetting occurred with single pulses applied to various distant DRs.Conclusion:Electrical stimulation recruited spinal networks that generate locomotor programs when pulses were delivered to multiple sites at low frequency. This finding might help devising new protocols to optimize the increasingly more common use of epidural implantable arrays to treat spinal dysfunctions.

AB - Study design:Experimental animal study.Objectives:Epidural stimulation has been used to activate locomotor patterns after spinal injury and typically employs synchronous trains of high-frequency stimuli delivered directly to the dorsal cord, thereby recruiting multiple afferent nerve roots. Here we investigate how spinal locomotor networks integrate multi-site afferent input and address whether frequency coding is more important than amplitude to activate locomotor patterns.Setting:Italy and Belgium.Methods:To investigate the importance of input intensity and frequency in eliciting locomotor activity, we used isolated neonatal rat spinal cords to record episodes of fictive locomotion (FL) induced by electrical stimulation of single and multiple dorsal roots (DRs), employing different stimulating protocols.Results:FL was efficiently induced through staggered delivery (delays 0.5 to 2 s) of low-frequency pulse trains (0.33 and 0.67 Hz) to three DRs at intensities sufficient to activate ventral root reflexes. Delivery of the same trains to a single DR or synchronously to multiple DRs remained ineffective. Multi-site staggered trains were more efficient than randomized pulse delivery. Weak trains simultaneously delivered to DRs failed to elicit FL. Locomotor rhythm resetting occurred with single pulses applied to various distant DRs.Conclusion:Electrical stimulation recruited spinal networks that generate locomotor programs when pulses were delivered to multiple sites at low frequency. This finding might help devising new protocols to optimize the increasingly more common use of epidural implantable arrays to treat spinal dysfunctions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84983096245&partnerID=MN8TOARS

U2 - 10.1038/sc.2015.106

DO - 10.1038/sc.2015.106

M3 - Article

VL - 54

SP - 93

EP - 101

JO - Spinal Cord

JF - Spinal Cord

ER -