Stakeholders' participation in the fisheries management decision-making process: fishers' perceptions of participation

Cristina Pita, Graham J Pierce, Ioannis Theodossiou

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

65 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Public participation is a key ingredient of good governance and there are many advantages of involving stakeholders in the decision-making process. The European Commission identified the lack of stakeholder involvement as one of the major weaknesses of the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP). As such, the 2002 Reform of the CFP aimed to improve its system of governance by increasing the involvement of stakeholders in decision-making. Over the last decade, Scottish inshore waters have seen an increase in management measures focused on involving fishers, delegating responsibilities and decentralizing management. The present document investigates commercial inshore fishers' perceptions of participation in the decision-making process and attitudes towards a new management regime - the Inshore Fisheries Groups (IFGs) - which aims to increase participation in and decentralization of inshore fisheries management. A survey was conducted, through face-to-face interviews, and ordered logistic and multiple regression models created to identify which characteristics influence fishers' perceptions and attitudes. The present analysis concluded that, 5 years subsequent to the reform of the CFP, the majority of inshore fishers perceive themselves not to be consulted or involved in the decision-making process. However, and despite the fact that fishers are not completely certain of the potential of the IFGs to increase their participation in the management process, they have an overall positive attitude towards their implementation.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1093-1102
Number of pages10
JournalMarine Policy
Volume34
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2010

Fingerprint

Common Fisheries Policy
fishery management
fisheries management
fishery
stakeholders
decision-making process
decision making
stakeholder
fisheries
participation
management
governance
European Commission
decentralization
politics
multiple regression
logistics
reform
process management
good governance

Keywords

  • decision making
  • fishers
  • inshore fisheries groups
  • management
  • participation
  • perceptions

Cite this

Stakeholders' participation in the fisheries management decision-making process : fishers' perceptions of participation. / Pita, Cristina; Pierce, Graham J; Theodossiou, Ioannis.

In: Marine Policy, Vol. 34, No. 5, 09.2010, p. 1093-1102 .

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{550dc2c53a4d4d84a5e820062d099729,
title = "Stakeholders' participation in the fisheries management decision-making process: fishers' perceptions of participation",
abstract = "Public participation is a key ingredient of good governance and there are many advantages of involving stakeholders in the decision-making process. The European Commission identified the lack of stakeholder involvement as one of the major weaknesses of the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP). As such, the 2002 Reform of the CFP aimed to improve its system of governance by increasing the involvement of stakeholders in decision-making. Over the last decade, Scottish inshore waters have seen an increase in management measures focused on involving fishers, delegating responsibilities and decentralizing management. The present document investigates commercial inshore fishers' perceptions of participation in the decision-making process and attitudes towards a new management regime - the Inshore Fisheries Groups (IFGs) - which aims to increase participation in and decentralization of inshore fisheries management. A survey was conducted, through face-to-face interviews, and ordered logistic and multiple regression models created to identify which characteristics influence fishers' perceptions and attitudes. The present analysis concluded that, 5 years subsequent to the reform of the CFP, the majority of inshore fishers perceive themselves not to be consulted or involved in the decision-making process. However, and despite the fact that fishers are not completely certain of the potential of the IFGs to increase their participation in the management process, they have an overall positive attitude towards their implementation.",
keywords = "decision making, fishers, inshore fisheries groups, management, participation, perceptions",
author = "Cristina Pita and Pierce, {Graham J} and Ioannis Theodossiou",
year = "2010",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1016/j.marpol.2010.03.009",
language = "English",
volume = "34",
pages = "1093--1102",
journal = "Marine Policy",
issn = "0308-597X",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Stakeholders' participation in the fisheries management decision-making process

T2 - fishers' perceptions of participation

AU - Pita, Cristina

AU - Pierce, Graham J

AU - Theodossiou, Ioannis

PY - 2010/9

Y1 - 2010/9

N2 - Public participation is a key ingredient of good governance and there are many advantages of involving stakeholders in the decision-making process. The European Commission identified the lack of stakeholder involvement as one of the major weaknesses of the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP). As such, the 2002 Reform of the CFP aimed to improve its system of governance by increasing the involvement of stakeholders in decision-making. Over the last decade, Scottish inshore waters have seen an increase in management measures focused on involving fishers, delegating responsibilities and decentralizing management. The present document investigates commercial inshore fishers' perceptions of participation in the decision-making process and attitudes towards a new management regime - the Inshore Fisheries Groups (IFGs) - which aims to increase participation in and decentralization of inshore fisheries management. A survey was conducted, through face-to-face interviews, and ordered logistic and multiple regression models created to identify which characteristics influence fishers' perceptions and attitudes. The present analysis concluded that, 5 years subsequent to the reform of the CFP, the majority of inshore fishers perceive themselves not to be consulted or involved in the decision-making process. However, and despite the fact that fishers are not completely certain of the potential of the IFGs to increase their participation in the management process, they have an overall positive attitude towards their implementation.

AB - Public participation is a key ingredient of good governance and there are many advantages of involving stakeholders in the decision-making process. The European Commission identified the lack of stakeholder involvement as one of the major weaknesses of the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP). As such, the 2002 Reform of the CFP aimed to improve its system of governance by increasing the involvement of stakeholders in decision-making. Over the last decade, Scottish inshore waters have seen an increase in management measures focused on involving fishers, delegating responsibilities and decentralizing management. The present document investigates commercial inshore fishers' perceptions of participation in the decision-making process and attitudes towards a new management regime - the Inshore Fisheries Groups (IFGs) - which aims to increase participation in and decentralization of inshore fisheries management. A survey was conducted, through face-to-face interviews, and ordered logistic and multiple regression models created to identify which characteristics influence fishers' perceptions and attitudes. The present analysis concluded that, 5 years subsequent to the reform of the CFP, the majority of inshore fishers perceive themselves not to be consulted or involved in the decision-making process. However, and despite the fact that fishers are not completely certain of the potential of the IFGs to increase their participation in the management process, they have an overall positive attitude towards their implementation.

KW - decision making

KW - fishers

KW - inshore fisheries groups

KW - management

KW - participation

KW - perceptions

U2 - 10.1016/j.marpol.2010.03.009

DO - 10.1016/j.marpol.2010.03.009

M3 - Article

VL - 34

SP - 1093

EP - 1102

JO - Marine Policy

JF - Marine Policy

SN - 0308-597X

IS - 5

ER -