Still vacant after all these years – Evaluating the efficiency of property-led urban regeneration

David Adams, Alan Disberry, Norman Hutchison

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    4 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Property developers and investors have been at the forefront of urban regeneration in the UK since the 1980s. This has produced an emphasis on prime office space, luxury apartments, shopping centres and leisure attractions, which has been widely criticised on social equity grounds. There has, however, been only limited interrogation of the failure of property-led regeneration to deliver on the development it promises or on whether it represents good value for public money. Nottingham Eastside is one such example of policy and market failure, where for over a quarter of a century, property developers and investors have come and gone, none of four masterplans have been implemented, decontamination and infrastructure provision has never been completed, and most of the land is still vacant. By reconstructing the story of Nottingham Eastside, the paper argues that over-reliance on property-led regeneration can be highly inefficient, let alone inequitable, as a means to achieve strategic urban redevelopment.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)505-524
    Number of pages20
    JournalLocal Economy
    Volume32
    Issue number6
    Early online date18 Sep 2017
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Sep 2017

    Fingerprint

    Urban regeneration
    Investors
    Developer
    Regeneration
    Luxury
    Shopping centres
    Leisure
    Social equity
    Urban redevelopment
    Attraction
    Policy failure
    Market failure

    Keywords

    • Property-led urban regeneration
    • urban redevelopment process
    • hardcore land vacancy

    Cite this

    Still vacant after all these years – Evaluating the efficiency of property-led urban regeneration. / Adams, David; Disberry, Alan; Hutchison, Norman.

    In: Local Economy, Vol. 32, No. 6, 09.2017, p. 505-524.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    @article{782926d2502d43a2a7d7857e38e136a8,
    title = "Still vacant after all these years – Evaluating the efficiency of property-led urban regeneration",
    abstract = "Property developers and investors have been at the forefront of urban regeneration in the UK since the 1980s. This has produced an emphasis on prime office space, luxury apartments, shopping centres and leisure attractions, which has been widely criticised on social equity grounds. There has, however, been only limited interrogation of the failure of property-led regeneration to deliver on the development it promises or on whether it represents good value for public money. Nottingham Eastside is one such example of policy and market failure, where for over a quarter of a century, property developers and investors have come and gone, none of four masterplans have been implemented, decontamination and infrastructure provision has never been completed, and most of the land is still vacant. By reconstructing the story of Nottingham Eastside, the paper argues that over-reliance on property-led regeneration can be highly inefficient, let alone inequitable, as a means to achieve strategic urban redevelopment.",
    keywords = "Property-led urban regeneration, urban redevelopment process, hardcore land vacancy",
    author = "David Adams and Alan Disberry and Norman Hutchison",
    note = "The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.",
    year = "2017",
    month = "9",
    doi = "10.1177/0269094217729129",
    language = "English",
    volume = "32",
    pages = "505--524",
    journal = "Local Economy",
    issn = "0269-0942",
    publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
    number = "6",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Still vacant after all these years – Evaluating the efficiency of property-led urban regeneration

    AU - Adams, David

    AU - Disberry, Alan

    AU - Hutchison, Norman

    N1 - The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

    PY - 2017/9

    Y1 - 2017/9

    N2 - Property developers and investors have been at the forefront of urban regeneration in the UK since the 1980s. This has produced an emphasis on prime office space, luxury apartments, shopping centres and leisure attractions, which has been widely criticised on social equity grounds. There has, however, been only limited interrogation of the failure of property-led regeneration to deliver on the development it promises or on whether it represents good value for public money. Nottingham Eastside is one such example of policy and market failure, where for over a quarter of a century, property developers and investors have come and gone, none of four masterplans have been implemented, decontamination and infrastructure provision has never been completed, and most of the land is still vacant. By reconstructing the story of Nottingham Eastside, the paper argues that over-reliance on property-led regeneration can be highly inefficient, let alone inequitable, as a means to achieve strategic urban redevelopment.

    AB - Property developers and investors have been at the forefront of urban regeneration in the UK since the 1980s. This has produced an emphasis on prime office space, luxury apartments, shopping centres and leisure attractions, which has been widely criticised on social equity grounds. There has, however, been only limited interrogation of the failure of property-led regeneration to deliver on the development it promises or on whether it represents good value for public money. Nottingham Eastside is one such example of policy and market failure, where for over a quarter of a century, property developers and investors have come and gone, none of four masterplans have been implemented, decontamination and infrastructure provision has never been completed, and most of the land is still vacant. By reconstructing the story of Nottingham Eastside, the paper argues that over-reliance on property-led regeneration can be highly inefficient, let alone inequitable, as a means to achieve strategic urban redevelopment.

    KW - Property-led urban regeneration

    KW - urban redevelopment process

    KW - hardcore land vacancy

    U2 - 10.1177/0269094217729129

    DO - 10.1177/0269094217729129

    M3 - Article

    VL - 32

    SP - 505

    EP - 524

    JO - Local Economy

    JF - Local Economy

    SN - 0269-0942

    IS - 6

    ER -