Striking the right balance in colorectal cancer care--a qualitative study of rural and urban patients

N. S. Bain, Neil Crawford Campbell, Lewis Duthie Ritchie, J. Cassidy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

60 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background. Colorectal cancer is the second most common cause of cancer-related death in Scotland. For patients, the journey from diagnosis through treatment is complex and there are inequalities in survival rates.

Objectives. The aim of the present study was to explore how patients with colorectal cancer perceive their care.

Methods. This was a qualitative study involving 95 patients and relatives of patients with colorectal cancer in the North, Northeast and Northern Isles, Scotland. Focus groups (32 participants) were conducted in hospital, and interviews (63 participants) in patients' own homes in order to explore their experiences of health services for cancer-what was good, what was bad and what was needed. Analysis was inductive, with exploration of similar and divergent perspectives within themes.

Results. Patients wanted rapid diagnosis, specialist treatment and good communication, but their experiences of and perspectives on these areas were often divergent. Delays in diagnosis could stem from late presentation by patients, but also from early presentation when the cancer could go undetected. GP continuity was desirable, but sometimes implicated in delays. Patients preferred their GPs to be advocates, not gatekeepers. The context, however, was one where some patients pursued their care tenaciously while others did not. For some, speed of progress through the system was everything, but others found this could be impersonal. Outlying patients had to balance transport difficulties with the benefits of distant specialist treatment. Some patients wanted full information to be provided directly, but others could not cope with this.

Conclusions. From patients' perspectives, ideal cancer care cannot be achieved in a uniform way. For some of the key goals of cancer treatment to be met, including rapid access to specialist treatment for all and good communication of bad news and test results, a balance must be struck which tailors care to individuals.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)369-374
Number of pages5
JournalFamily Practice
Volume19
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2002

Keywords

  • colorectal cancer
  • health services
  • patients' perspective
  • qualitative research
  • INFORMATION NEEDS
  • DYSPEPSIA
  • DIAGNOSIS
  • SURVIVAL
  • CONSULT
  • AREAS

Cite this

Striking the right balance in colorectal cancer care--a qualitative study of rural and urban patients. / Bain, N. S.; Campbell, Neil Crawford; Ritchie, Lewis Duthie; Cassidy, J.

In: Family Practice, Vol. 19, No. 4, 2002, p. 369-374.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bain, N. S. ; Campbell, Neil Crawford ; Ritchie, Lewis Duthie ; Cassidy, J. / Striking the right balance in colorectal cancer care--a qualitative study of rural and urban patients. In: Family Practice. 2002 ; Vol. 19, No. 4. pp. 369-374.
@article{09ddbff958f046959ee7c1a27ecdcac9,
title = "Striking the right balance in colorectal cancer care--a qualitative study of rural and urban patients",
abstract = "Background. Colorectal cancer is the second most common cause of cancer-related death in Scotland. For patients, the journey from diagnosis through treatment is complex and there are inequalities in survival rates.Objectives. The aim of the present study was to explore how patients with colorectal cancer perceive their care.Methods. This was a qualitative study involving 95 patients and relatives of patients with colorectal cancer in the North, Northeast and Northern Isles, Scotland. Focus groups (32 participants) were conducted in hospital, and interviews (63 participants) in patients' own homes in order to explore their experiences of health services for cancer-what was good, what was bad and what was needed. Analysis was inductive, with exploration of similar and divergent perspectives within themes.Results. Patients wanted rapid diagnosis, specialist treatment and good communication, but their experiences of and perspectives on these areas were often divergent. Delays in diagnosis could stem from late presentation by patients, but also from early presentation when the cancer could go undetected. GP continuity was desirable, but sometimes implicated in delays. Patients preferred their GPs to be advocates, not gatekeepers. The context, however, was one where some patients pursued their care tenaciously while others did not. For some, speed of progress through the system was everything, but others found this could be impersonal. Outlying patients had to balance transport difficulties with the benefits of distant specialist treatment. Some patients wanted full information to be provided directly, but others could not cope with this.Conclusions. From patients' perspectives, ideal cancer care cannot be achieved in a uniform way. For some of the key goals of cancer treatment to be met, including rapid access to specialist treatment for all and good communication of bad news and test results, a balance must be struck which tailors care to individuals.",
keywords = "colorectal cancer, health services, patients' perspective, qualitative research, INFORMATION NEEDS, DYSPEPSIA, DIAGNOSIS, SURVIVAL, CONSULT, AREAS",
author = "Bain, {N. S.} and Campbell, {Neil Crawford} and Ritchie, {Lewis Duthie} and J. Cassidy",
year = "2002",
doi = "10.1093/fampra/19.4.369",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "369--374",
journal = "Family Practice",
issn = "0263-2136",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Striking the right balance in colorectal cancer care--a qualitative study of rural and urban patients

AU - Bain, N. S.

AU - Campbell, Neil Crawford

AU - Ritchie, Lewis Duthie

AU - Cassidy, J.

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

N2 - Background. Colorectal cancer is the second most common cause of cancer-related death in Scotland. For patients, the journey from diagnosis through treatment is complex and there are inequalities in survival rates.Objectives. The aim of the present study was to explore how patients with colorectal cancer perceive their care.Methods. This was a qualitative study involving 95 patients and relatives of patients with colorectal cancer in the North, Northeast and Northern Isles, Scotland. Focus groups (32 participants) were conducted in hospital, and interviews (63 participants) in patients' own homes in order to explore their experiences of health services for cancer-what was good, what was bad and what was needed. Analysis was inductive, with exploration of similar and divergent perspectives within themes.Results. Patients wanted rapid diagnosis, specialist treatment and good communication, but their experiences of and perspectives on these areas were often divergent. Delays in diagnosis could stem from late presentation by patients, but also from early presentation when the cancer could go undetected. GP continuity was desirable, but sometimes implicated in delays. Patients preferred their GPs to be advocates, not gatekeepers. The context, however, was one where some patients pursued their care tenaciously while others did not. For some, speed of progress through the system was everything, but others found this could be impersonal. Outlying patients had to balance transport difficulties with the benefits of distant specialist treatment. Some patients wanted full information to be provided directly, but others could not cope with this.Conclusions. From patients' perspectives, ideal cancer care cannot be achieved in a uniform way. For some of the key goals of cancer treatment to be met, including rapid access to specialist treatment for all and good communication of bad news and test results, a balance must be struck which tailors care to individuals.

AB - Background. Colorectal cancer is the second most common cause of cancer-related death in Scotland. For patients, the journey from diagnosis through treatment is complex and there are inequalities in survival rates.Objectives. The aim of the present study was to explore how patients with colorectal cancer perceive their care.Methods. This was a qualitative study involving 95 patients and relatives of patients with colorectal cancer in the North, Northeast and Northern Isles, Scotland. Focus groups (32 participants) were conducted in hospital, and interviews (63 participants) in patients' own homes in order to explore their experiences of health services for cancer-what was good, what was bad and what was needed. Analysis was inductive, with exploration of similar and divergent perspectives within themes.Results. Patients wanted rapid diagnosis, specialist treatment and good communication, but their experiences of and perspectives on these areas were often divergent. Delays in diagnosis could stem from late presentation by patients, but also from early presentation when the cancer could go undetected. GP continuity was desirable, but sometimes implicated in delays. Patients preferred their GPs to be advocates, not gatekeepers. The context, however, was one where some patients pursued their care tenaciously while others did not. For some, speed of progress through the system was everything, but others found this could be impersonal. Outlying patients had to balance transport difficulties with the benefits of distant specialist treatment. Some patients wanted full information to be provided directly, but others could not cope with this.Conclusions. From patients' perspectives, ideal cancer care cannot be achieved in a uniform way. For some of the key goals of cancer treatment to be met, including rapid access to specialist treatment for all and good communication of bad news and test results, a balance must be struck which tailors care to individuals.

KW - colorectal cancer

KW - health services

KW - patients' perspective

KW - qualitative research

KW - INFORMATION NEEDS

KW - DYSPEPSIA

KW - DIAGNOSIS

KW - SURVIVAL

KW - CONSULT

KW - AREAS

U2 - 10.1093/fampra/19.4.369

DO - 10.1093/fampra/19.4.369

M3 - Article

VL - 19

SP - 369

EP - 374

JO - Family Practice

JF - Family Practice

SN - 0263-2136

IS - 4

ER -