Abstract
Abstract
OBJECT: To design and evaluate a fully shielded, ¿/4 stripline resonator as a receive-only surface coil for preclinical MRI at 4.7 T.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 20 mm diameter stripline surface coil was fabricated from double-sided Duroid 5880 PCB material and was directly coupled to the input of a MOSFET preamplifier, without requiring a matching network. The new coil was compared with a conventional 20 mm, wire loop, receive-only surface coil in imaging experiments with a separate transmit-only saddle coil.
RESULTS: The stripline surface coil exhibits a loaded Q-factor of 132 at 200 MHz, compared to 138 for a conventional wire loop coil and its resonant frequency drops by 0.2 MHz under loading, rather than 0.5 MHz for the wire loop. The stripline coil displays a more symmetrical B (1) map compared to the wire loop, but the SNR falls off more rapidly with depth so it is 30% poorer 8 mm from the coil plane. It should be possible, however, to reduce this difference by using a thicker dielectric in future versions of the stripline coil.
CONCLUSION: Compared to a conventional surface coil, the stripline coil is easy to manufacture, requires shorter set-up times and shows reduced dielectric interaction with conductive samples.
OBJECT: To design and evaluate a fully shielded, ¿/4 stripline resonator as a receive-only surface coil for preclinical MRI at 4.7 T.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 20 mm diameter stripline surface coil was fabricated from double-sided Duroid 5880 PCB material and was directly coupled to the input of a MOSFET preamplifier, without requiring a matching network. The new coil was compared with a conventional 20 mm, wire loop, receive-only surface coil in imaging experiments with a separate transmit-only saddle coil.
RESULTS: The stripline surface coil exhibits a loaded Q-factor of 132 at 200 MHz, compared to 138 for a conventional wire loop coil and its resonant frequency drops by 0.2 MHz under loading, rather than 0.5 MHz for the wire loop. The stripline coil displays a more symmetrical B (1) map compared to the wire loop, but the SNR falls off more rapidly with depth so it is 30% poorer 8 mm from the coil plane. It should be possible, however, to reduce this difference by using a thicker dielectric in future versions of the stripline coil.
CONCLUSION: Compared to a conventional surface coil, the stripline coil is easy to manufacture, requires shorter set-up times and shows reduced dielectric interaction with conductive samples.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 331-337 |
| Number of pages | 7 |
| Journal | Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine |
| Volume | 24 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2011 |
Keywords
- Preclinical MRI
- Surface coil
- Stripline resonator
- High input impedance preamplifier
- Electronic decoupling