Student views on the introduction of anatomy teaching packages into clinical attachments

Alan Dawson, S A M Bruce, S D Heys, I J Stewart

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Following the implementation of the GMC document Tomorrow's Doctors in 1993 the amount of time dedicated to anatomy in undergraduate curricula has been reduced. This has resulted in considerable disquiet among physicians and surgeons with regard to the anatomical knowledge of newly qualified doctors, and also amongst students. This study aimed to assess the perceived student need for anatomical teaching packages to support clinical attachments in the later years of the undergraduate medical curriculum. The views of two groups of students were obtained: Group A were at the beginning of their clinical attachments, whereas Group B had completed all clinical attachments and had sat the final examination. The majority of students indicated that there was a need for the development of a teaching package for anatomy (and other basic sciences) in the later stages of the undergraduate medical curriculum. A high proportion stated that the completion of these packages should be in a self-directed manner with a staff member available. There was a difference between both groups in response to the best time to offer the packages, and in the clinical areas which might be prioritized in such a development. We conclude that the vertical integration of anatomy—perhaps through clinically focused teaching packages—would be welcomed by students as part of their clinical attachments. Clin. Anat. 22:267–272, 2009. © 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)267-272
Number of pages6
JournalClinical Anatomy
Volume22
Issue number2
Early online date20 Nov 2008
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2009

Fingerprint

Anatomy
Teaching
Students
Curriculum
Physicians

Keywords

  • anatomy
  • teaching
  • medical education
  • integrated curriculum

Cite this

Student views on the introduction of anatomy teaching packages into clinical attachments. / Dawson, Alan; Bruce, S A M; Heys, S D; Stewart, I J.

In: Clinical Anatomy, Vol. 22, No. 2, 03.2009, p. 267-272.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Dawson, Alan ; Bruce, S A M ; Heys, S D ; Stewart, I J. / Student views on the introduction of anatomy teaching packages into clinical attachments. In: Clinical Anatomy. 2009 ; Vol. 22, No. 2. pp. 267-272.
@article{f90b94bce82c4a709c3aecd058fa9d83,
title = "Student views on the introduction of anatomy teaching packages into clinical attachments",
abstract = "Following the implementation of the GMC document Tomorrow's Doctors in 1993 the amount of time dedicated to anatomy in undergraduate curricula has been reduced. This has resulted in considerable disquiet among physicians and surgeons with regard to the anatomical knowledge of newly qualified doctors, and also amongst students. This study aimed to assess the perceived student need for anatomical teaching packages to support clinical attachments in the later years of the undergraduate medical curriculum. The views of two groups of students were obtained: Group A were at the beginning of their clinical attachments, whereas Group B had completed all clinical attachments and had sat the final examination. The majority of students indicated that there was a need for the development of a teaching package for anatomy (and other basic sciences) in the later stages of the undergraduate medical curriculum. A high proportion stated that the completion of these packages should be in a self-directed manner with a staff member available. There was a difference between both groups in response to the best time to offer the packages, and in the clinical areas which might be prioritized in such a development. We conclude that the vertical integration of anatomy—perhaps through clinically focused teaching packages—would be welcomed by students as part of their clinical attachments. Clin. Anat. 22:267–272, 2009. {\circledC} 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.",
keywords = "anatomy, teaching, medical education, integrated curriculum",
author = "Alan Dawson and Bruce, {S A M} and Heys, {S D} and Stewart, {I J}",
year = "2009",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1002/ca.20732",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "267--272",
journal = "Clinical Anatomy",
issn = "0897-3806",
publisher = "Wiley-Liss Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Student views on the introduction of anatomy teaching packages into clinical attachments

AU - Dawson, Alan

AU - Bruce, S A M

AU - Heys, S D

AU - Stewart, I J

PY - 2009/3

Y1 - 2009/3

N2 - Following the implementation of the GMC document Tomorrow's Doctors in 1993 the amount of time dedicated to anatomy in undergraduate curricula has been reduced. This has resulted in considerable disquiet among physicians and surgeons with regard to the anatomical knowledge of newly qualified doctors, and also amongst students. This study aimed to assess the perceived student need for anatomical teaching packages to support clinical attachments in the later years of the undergraduate medical curriculum. The views of two groups of students were obtained: Group A were at the beginning of their clinical attachments, whereas Group B had completed all clinical attachments and had sat the final examination. The majority of students indicated that there was a need for the development of a teaching package for anatomy (and other basic sciences) in the later stages of the undergraduate medical curriculum. A high proportion stated that the completion of these packages should be in a self-directed manner with a staff member available. There was a difference between both groups in response to the best time to offer the packages, and in the clinical areas which might be prioritized in such a development. We conclude that the vertical integration of anatomy—perhaps through clinically focused teaching packages—would be welcomed by students as part of their clinical attachments. Clin. Anat. 22:267–272, 2009. © 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

AB - Following the implementation of the GMC document Tomorrow's Doctors in 1993 the amount of time dedicated to anatomy in undergraduate curricula has been reduced. This has resulted in considerable disquiet among physicians and surgeons with regard to the anatomical knowledge of newly qualified doctors, and also amongst students. This study aimed to assess the perceived student need for anatomical teaching packages to support clinical attachments in the later years of the undergraduate medical curriculum. The views of two groups of students were obtained: Group A were at the beginning of their clinical attachments, whereas Group B had completed all clinical attachments and had sat the final examination. The majority of students indicated that there was a need for the development of a teaching package for anatomy (and other basic sciences) in the later stages of the undergraduate medical curriculum. A high proportion stated that the completion of these packages should be in a self-directed manner with a staff member available. There was a difference between both groups in response to the best time to offer the packages, and in the clinical areas which might be prioritized in such a development. We conclude that the vertical integration of anatomy—perhaps through clinically focused teaching packages—would be welcomed by students as part of their clinical attachments. Clin. Anat. 22:267–272, 2009. © 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

KW - anatomy

KW - teaching

KW - medical education

KW - integrated curriculum

U2 - 10.1002/ca.20732

DO - 10.1002/ca.20732

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 267

EP - 272

JO - Clinical Anatomy

JF - Clinical Anatomy

SN - 0897-3806

IS - 2

ER -