Subjectivity and embodied limits: Deborah Creamer’s Disability and Christian Theology

Michael Mawson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

his article explores the tensions between our subjectivity and our status as embodied and limited beings, specifically in relation to Deborah Creamer's Disability and Christian Theology: Embodied Limits and Constructive Possibilities (2009). Moreover, this article aims to supplement and expand on Creamer's “model of limits” by arguing for a stronger attentiveness to the radically disruptive potential of our embodied limits. It also claims that such an attentiveness helps us to recognize two points at which Creamer overextends herself: (1) the claim that we are able to determine for ourselves what our individual limits are, and (2) the claim that we able to draw on our limits to creatively construct an image of God as similarly limited.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)409-417
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of religion, disability & health
Volume17
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 13 Nov 2013

Fingerprint

Theology
theology
supplement
subjectivity
god
disability
Christian Theology
Subjectivity

Keywords

  • disability
  • subjectivity
  • embodiment
  • Deborah Creamer
  • Judith Butler

Cite this

Subjectivity and embodied limits : Deborah Creamer’s Disability and Christian Theology. / Mawson, Michael.

In: Journal of religion, disability & health, Vol. 17, No. 4, 13.11.2013, p. 409-417.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0df05cf9140344ef92e712cc5d001ef3,
title = "Subjectivity and embodied limits: Deborah Creamer’s Disability and Christian Theology",
abstract = "his article explores the tensions between our subjectivity and our status as embodied and limited beings, specifically in relation to Deborah Creamer's Disability and Christian Theology: Embodied Limits and Constructive Possibilities (2009). Moreover, this article aims to supplement and expand on Creamer's “model of limits” by arguing for a stronger attentiveness to the radically disruptive potential of our embodied limits. It also claims that such an attentiveness helps us to recognize two points at which Creamer overextends herself: (1) the claim that we are able to determine for ourselves what our individual limits are, and (2) the claim that we able to draw on our limits to creatively construct an image of God as similarly limited.",
keywords = "disability, subjectivity, embodiment, Deborah Creamer, Judith Butler",
author = "Michael Mawson",
year = "2013",
month = "11",
day = "13",
doi = "10.1080/15228967.2013.840962",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "409--417",
journal = "Journal of religion, disability & health",
issn = "1522-8967",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Subjectivity and embodied limits

T2 - Deborah Creamer’s Disability and Christian Theology

AU - Mawson, Michael

PY - 2013/11/13

Y1 - 2013/11/13

N2 - his article explores the tensions between our subjectivity and our status as embodied and limited beings, specifically in relation to Deborah Creamer's Disability and Christian Theology: Embodied Limits and Constructive Possibilities (2009). Moreover, this article aims to supplement and expand on Creamer's “model of limits” by arguing for a stronger attentiveness to the radically disruptive potential of our embodied limits. It also claims that such an attentiveness helps us to recognize two points at which Creamer overextends herself: (1) the claim that we are able to determine for ourselves what our individual limits are, and (2) the claim that we able to draw on our limits to creatively construct an image of God as similarly limited.

AB - his article explores the tensions between our subjectivity and our status as embodied and limited beings, specifically in relation to Deborah Creamer's Disability and Christian Theology: Embodied Limits and Constructive Possibilities (2009). Moreover, this article aims to supplement and expand on Creamer's “model of limits” by arguing for a stronger attentiveness to the radically disruptive potential of our embodied limits. It also claims that such an attentiveness helps us to recognize two points at which Creamer overextends herself: (1) the claim that we are able to determine for ourselves what our individual limits are, and (2) the claim that we able to draw on our limits to creatively construct an image of God as similarly limited.

KW - disability

KW - subjectivity

KW - embodiment

KW - Deborah Creamer

KW - Judith Butler

U2 - 10.1080/15228967.2013.840962

DO - 10.1080/15228967.2013.840962

M3 - Article

VL - 17

SP - 409

EP - 417

JO - Journal of religion, disability & health

JF - Journal of religion, disability & health

SN - 1522-8967

IS - 4

ER -