Abstract
This work uses an information-based methodology to infer the connectivity of complex systems from observed time-series data. We first derive analytically an expression for the Mutual Information Rate (MIR), namely, the amount of information exchanged per unit of time, that can be used to estimate the MIR between two finite-length low-resolution noisy time-series, and then apply it after a proper normalization for the identification of the connectivity structure of small networks of interacting dynamical systems. In particular, we show that our methodology successfully infers the connectivity for heterogeneous networks, different time-series lengths or coupling strengths, and even in the presence of additive noise. Finally, we show that our methodology based on MIR successfully infers the connectivity of networks composed of nodes with different time-scale dynamics, where inference based on Mutual Information fails.
The Mutual Information Rate (MIR) measures the time rate of information exchanged between two non-random and correlated variables. Since variables in complex systems are not purely random, the MIR is an appropriate quantity to access the amount of information exchanged in complex systems. However, its calculation requires infinitely long measurements with arbitrary resolution. Having in mind that it is impossible to perform infinitely long measurements with perfect accuracy, this work shows how to estimate the MIR taking into consideration this fundamental limitation and how to use it for the characterization and understanding of dynamical and complex systems. Moreover, we introduce a novel normalized form of MIR that successfully infers the structure of small networks of interacting dynamical systems. The proposed inference methodology is robust in the presence of additive noise, different time-series lengths, and heterogeneous node dynamics and coupling strengths. Moreover, it also outperforms inference methods based on Mutual Information when analysing networks formed by nodes possessing different time-scales
The Mutual Information Rate (MIR) measures the time rate of information exchanged between two non-random and correlated variables. Since variables in complex systems are not purely random, the MIR is an appropriate quantity to access the amount of information exchanged in complex systems. However, its calculation requires infinitely long measurements with arbitrary resolution. Having in mind that it is impossible to perform infinitely long measurements with perfect accuracy, this work shows how to estimate the MIR taking into consideration this fundamental limitation and how to use it for the characterization and understanding of dynamical and complex systems. Moreover, we introduce a novel normalized form of MIR that successfully infers the structure of small networks of interacting dynamical systems. The proposed inference methodology is robust in the presence of additive noise, different time-series lengths, and heterogeneous node dynamics and coupling strengths. Moreover, it also outperforms inference methods based on Mutual Information when analysing networks formed by nodes possessing different time-scales
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 043102 |
Pages (from-to) | 1-9 |
Number of pages | 9 |
Journal | Chaos |
Volume | 26 |
Issue number | 4 |
Early online date | 12 Apr 2016 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Apr 2016 |
Bibliographical note
ACKNOWLEDGMENTSE.B.M., M.S.B., and C.G.A. acknowledge the financial support provided by the EPSRC “EP/I032606/1” grant. C.G.A. contributed to this work while working at the University of Aberdeen and then, while working at the University of Essex, United Kingdom. N.R. acknowledges the support of PEDECIBA, Uruguay
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Successful network inference from time-series data using mutual information rate'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Datasets
-
Successful network inference from time-series data using mutual information rate
Baptista, M. (Creator), University of Aberdeen, 28 Apr 2016
DOI: 10.20392/998cad91-390c-4014-a96c-b333046a0bde
Dataset