Summarising the points made in online political debates

Charlie Egan, Advaith Siddharthan, Adam Wyner

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

Online communities host growing numbers of discussions amongst large
groups of participants on all manner of topics. This user-generated content
contains millions of statements of opinions and ideas. We propose an abstractive
approach to summarize such argumentative discussions, making key content accessible through ‘point’ extraction, where a point is a verb and its syntactic arguments. Our approach uses both dependency parse information and verb case frames to identify and extract valid points, and generates an abstractive summary that discusses the key points being made in the debate. We performed a human evaluation of our approach using a corpus of online political debates and report significant improvements over a highperforming extractive summarizer.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of the Third Workshop on Argument Mining (ArgMining2016)
PublisherACL Anthology
Pages134-143
Number of pages10
ISBN (Electronic)978-1-945626-17-3
Publication statusPublished - 2016
Event3rd Workshop on Argument Mining: ACL 2016 - Berlin, Germany
Duration: 12 Aug 201612 Aug 2016
http://argmining2016.arg.tech/ (3rd Workshop on Argument Mining - ACL 2016)

Conference

Conference3rd Workshop on Argument Mining
Abbreviated titleArgMining 2016
CountryGermany
CityBerlin
Period12/08/1612/08/16
Internet address

Fingerprint

internet community
evaluation

Cite this

Egan, C., Siddharthan, A., & Wyner, A. (2016). Summarising the points made in online political debates. In Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Argument Mining (ArgMining2016) (pp. 134-143). [W16-2816] ACL Anthology.

Summarising the points made in online political debates. / Egan, Charlie; Siddharthan, Advaith; Wyner, Adam.

Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Argument Mining (ArgMining2016). ACL Anthology, 2016. p. 134-143 W16-2816.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Egan, C, Siddharthan, A & Wyner, A 2016, Summarising the points made in online political debates. in Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Argument Mining (ArgMining2016)., W16-2816, ACL Anthology, pp. 134-143, 3rd Workshop on Argument Mining, Berlin, Germany, 12/08/16.
Egan C, Siddharthan A, Wyner A. Summarising the points made in online political debates. In Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Argument Mining (ArgMining2016). ACL Anthology. 2016. p. 134-143. W16-2816
Egan, Charlie ; Siddharthan, Advaith ; Wyner, Adam. / Summarising the points made in online political debates. Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Argument Mining (ArgMining2016). ACL Anthology, 2016. pp. 134-143
@inproceedings{a118bb1c4ae54bb7992e2e4c8f870013,
title = "Summarising the points made in online political debates",
abstract = "Online communities host growing numbers of discussions amongst largegroups of participants on all manner of topics. This user-generated contentcontains millions of statements of opinions and ideas. We propose an abstractiveapproach to summarize such argumentative discussions, making key content accessible through ‘point’ extraction, where a point is a verb and its syntactic arguments. Our approach uses both dependency parse information and verb case frames to identify and extract valid points, and generates an abstractive summary that discusses the key points being made in the debate. We performed a human evaluation of our approach using a corpus of online political debates and report significant improvements over a highperforming extractive summarizer.",
author = "Charlie Egan and Advaith Siddharthan and Adam Wyner",
note = "This work was supported by the Economic and Social Research Council [Grant number ES/M001628/1].",
year = "2016",
language = "English",
pages = "134--143",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Argument Mining (ArgMining2016)",
publisher = "ACL Anthology",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Summarising the points made in online political debates

AU - Egan, Charlie

AU - Siddharthan, Advaith

AU - Wyner, Adam

N1 - This work was supported by the Economic and Social Research Council [Grant number ES/M001628/1].

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Online communities host growing numbers of discussions amongst largegroups of participants on all manner of topics. This user-generated contentcontains millions of statements of opinions and ideas. We propose an abstractiveapproach to summarize such argumentative discussions, making key content accessible through ‘point’ extraction, where a point is a verb and its syntactic arguments. Our approach uses both dependency parse information and verb case frames to identify and extract valid points, and generates an abstractive summary that discusses the key points being made in the debate. We performed a human evaluation of our approach using a corpus of online political debates and report significant improvements over a highperforming extractive summarizer.

AB - Online communities host growing numbers of discussions amongst largegroups of participants on all manner of topics. This user-generated contentcontains millions of statements of opinions and ideas. We propose an abstractiveapproach to summarize such argumentative discussions, making key content accessible through ‘point’ extraction, where a point is a verb and its syntactic arguments. Our approach uses both dependency parse information and verb case frames to identify and extract valid points, and generates an abstractive summary that discusses the key points being made in the debate. We performed a human evaluation of our approach using a corpus of online political debates and report significant improvements over a highperforming extractive summarizer.

M3 - Conference contribution

SP - 134

EP - 143

BT - Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Argument Mining (ArgMining2016)

PB - ACL Anthology

ER -