Superficial parotidectomy versus extracapsular dissection: literature review and search for a gold standard technique

H. Martin* (Corresponding Author), J. Jayasinghe, T. Lowe

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

Benign parotid tumours usually present as a slow-growing, asymptomatic mass in the pre-auricular region. Although they are uncommon, surgical excision is the mainstay of treatment due to the risk of malignant transformation in some benign tumours. Surgical techniques have evolved over the years, with superficial parotidectomy and extracapsular dissection being the current procedures of choice. There is currently no gold standard, and it remains unclear which surgical modality is the superior option. A literature review was performed in relation to the relative merits of each technique and to evaluate the reasons underpinning the ongoing debate. A total of 16 papers comparing the main clinical outcomes of the procedures were critically reviewed using the PRISMA protocol. Overall, extracapsular dissection indicated a reduced recurrence rate, facial nerve paralysis, Frey syndrome, and operation time. The superior outcomes following extracapsular dissection could be attributed to the less radical nature of the procedure. However, there were various limitations identified within the review that may have affected the results. Selection bias was the most significant, with patients assigned to the different procedures depending on the tumour size and location. Consequently, the debate continues as to what constitutes the gold standard of care for benign parotid tumours.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)192-199
Number of pages8
JournalInternational Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume49
Issue number2
Early online date11 Jul 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2020

Fingerprint

Dissection
Neoplasms
Gustatory Sweating
Selection Bias
Facial Paralysis
Facial Nerve
Standard of Care
Recurrence
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • benign parotid tumour
  • extracapsular dissection
  • literature review
  • superficial parotidectomy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Oral Surgery
  • Otorhinolaryngology

Cite this

Superficial parotidectomy versus extracapsular dissection : literature review and search for a gold standard technique. / Martin, H. (Corresponding Author); Jayasinghe, J.; Lowe, T.

In: International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Vol. 49, No. 2, 02.2020, p. 192-199.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{e219144cbed6463c8f1ea518edad6a3a,
title = "Superficial parotidectomy versus extracapsular dissection: literature review and search for a gold standard technique",
abstract = "Benign parotid tumours usually present as a slow-growing, asymptomatic mass in the pre-auricular region. Although they are uncommon, surgical excision is the mainstay of treatment due to the risk of malignant transformation in some benign tumours. Surgical techniques have evolved over the years, with superficial parotidectomy and extracapsular dissection being the current procedures of choice. There is currently no gold standard, and it remains unclear which surgical modality is the superior option. A literature review was performed in relation to the relative merits of each technique and to evaluate the reasons underpinning the ongoing debate. A total of 16 papers comparing the main clinical outcomes of the procedures were critically reviewed using the PRISMA protocol. Overall, extracapsular dissection indicated a reduced recurrence rate, facial nerve paralysis, Frey syndrome, and operation time. The superior outcomes following extracapsular dissection could be attributed to the less radical nature of the procedure. However, there were various limitations identified within the review that may have affected the results. Selection bias was the most significant, with patients assigned to the different procedures depending on the tumour size and location. Consequently, the debate continues as to what constitutes the gold standard of care for benign parotid tumours.",
keywords = "benign parotid tumour, extracapsular dissection, literature review, superficial parotidectomy",
author = "H. Martin and J. Jayasinghe and T. Lowe",
year = "2020",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1016/j.ijom.2019.06.006",
language = "English",
volume = "49",
pages = "192--199",
journal = "International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery",
issn = "0901-5027",
publisher = "Churchill Livingstone",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Superficial parotidectomy versus extracapsular dissection

T2 - literature review and search for a gold standard technique

AU - Martin, H.

AU - Jayasinghe, J.

AU - Lowe, T.

PY - 2020/2

Y1 - 2020/2

N2 - Benign parotid tumours usually present as a slow-growing, asymptomatic mass in the pre-auricular region. Although they are uncommon, surgical excision is the mainstay of treatment due to the risk of malignant transformation in some benign tumours. Surgical techniques have evolved over the years, with superficial parotidectomy and extracapsular dissection being the current procedures of choice. There is currently no gold standard, and it remains unclear which surgical modality is the superior option. A literature review was performed in relation to the relative merits of each technique and to evaluate the reasons underpinning the ongoing debate. A total of 16 papers comparing the main clinical outcomes of the procedures were critically reviewed using the PRISMA protocol. Overall, extracapsular dissection indicated a reduced recurrence rate, facial nerve paralysis, Frey syndrome, and operation time. The superior outcomes following extracapsular dissection could be attributed to the less radical nature of the procedure. However, there were various limitations identified within the review that may have affected the results. Selection bias was the most significant, with patients assigned to the different procedures depending on the tumour size and location. Consequently, the debate continues as to what constitutes the gold standard of care for benign parotid tumours.

AB - Benign parotid tumours usually present as a slow-growing, asymptomatic mass in the pre-auricular region. Although they are uncommon, surgical excision is the mainstay of treatment due to the risk of malignant transformation in some benign tumours. Surgical techniques have evolved over the years, with superficial parotidectomy and extracapsular dissection being the current procedures of choice. There is currently no gold standard, and it remains unclear which surgical modality is the superior option. A literature review was performed in relation to the relative merits of each technique and to evaluate the reasons underpinning the ongoing debate. A total of 16 papers comparing the main clinical outcomes of the procedures were critically reviewed using the PRISMA protocol. Overall, extracapsular dissection indicated a reduced recurrence rate, facial nerve paralysis, Frey syndrome, and operation time. The superior outcomes following extracapsular dissection could be attributed to the less radical nature of the procedure. However, there were various limitations identified within the review that may have affected the results. Selection bias was the most significant, with patients assigned to the different procedures depending on the tumour size and location. Consequently, the debate continues as to what constitutes the gold standard of care for benign parotid tumours.

KW - benign parotid tumour

KW - extracapsular dissection

KW - literature review

KW - superficial parotidectomy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85068536108&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/superficial-parotidectomy-versus-extracapsular-dissection-literature-review-search-gold-standard-tec

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijom.2019.06.006

DO - 10.1016/j.ijom.2019.06.006

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:85068536108

VL - 49

SP - 192

EP - 199

JO - International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

JF - International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

SN - 0901-5027

IS - 2

ER -