Supporting patient autonomy: The importance of clinician-patient relationships

Vikki A. Entwistle, Stacy M. Carter, Alan Cribb, Kirsten McCaffery

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

173 Citations (Scopus)
1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Personal autonomy is widely valued. Recognition of its vulnerability in health care contexts led to the inclusion of respect for autonomy as a key concern in biomedical ethics. The principle of respect for autonomy is usually associated with allowing or enabling patients to make their own decisions about which health care interventions they will or will not receive. In this paper, we suggest that a strong focus on decision situations is problematic, especially when combined with a tendency to stress the importance of patients' independence in choosing. It distracts attention from other important aspects of and challenges to autonomy in health care. Relational understandings of autonomy attempt to explain both the positive and negative implications of social relationships for individuals' autonomy. They suggest that many health care practices can affect autonomy by virtue of their effects not only on patients' treatment preferences and choices, but also on their self-identities, self-evaluations and capabilities for autonomy. Relational understandings de-emphasise independence and facilitate well-nuanced distinctions between forms of clinical communication that support and that undermine patients' autonomy. These understandings support recognition of the value of good patient-professional relationships and can enrich the specification of the principle of respect for autonomy.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)741-745
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of General Internal Medicine
Volume25
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2010

Fingerprint

Delivery of Health Care
Professional-Patient Relations
Diagnostic Self Evaluation
Personal Autonomy
Bioethics
Patient Preference
Communication
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • personal autonomy
  • professional-patient relations
  • clinical ethics
  • relationship-centred care

Cite this

Supporting patient autonomy : The importance of clinician-patient relationships. / Entwistle, Vikki A.; Carter, Stacy M.; Cribb, Alan ; McCaffery, Kirsten.

In: Journal of General Internal Medicine, Vol. 25, No. 7, 07.2010, p. 741-745.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Entwistle, Vikki A. ; Carter, Stacy M. ; Cribb, Alan ; McCaffery, Kirsten. / Supporting patient autonomy : The importance of clinician-patient relationships. In: Journal of General Internal Medicine. 2010 ; Vol. 25, No. 7. pp. 741-745.
@article{fae71b57178f40fb82ea878f2cd406ee,
title = "Supporting patient autonomy: The importance of clinician-patient relationships",
abstract = "Personal autonomy is widely valued. Recognition of its vulnerability in health care contexts led to the inclusion of respect for autonomy as a key concern in biomedical ethics. The principle of respect for autonomy is usually associated with allowing or enabling patients to make their own decisions about which health care interventions they will or will not receive. In this paper, we suggest that a strong focus on decision situations is problematic, especially when combined with a tendency to stress the importance of patients' independence in choosing. It distracts attention from other important aspects of and challenges to autonomy in health care. Relational understandings of autonomy attempt to explain both the positive and negative implications of social relationships for individuals' autonomy. They suggest that many health care practices can affect autonomy by virtue of their effects not only on patients' treatment preferences and choices, but also on their self-identities, self-evaluations and capabilities for autonomy. Relational understandings de-emphasise independence and facilitate well-nuanced distinctions between forms of clinical communication that support and that undermine patients' autonomy. These understandings support recognition of the value of good patient-professional relationships and can enrich the specification of the principle of respect for autonomy.",
keywords = "personal autonomy, professional-patient relations, clinical ethics, relationship-centred care",
author = "Entwistle, {Vikki A.} and Carter, {Stacy M.} and Alan Cribb and Kirsten McCaffery",
year = "2010",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1007/s11606-010-1292-2",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "741--745",
journal = "Journal of General Internal Medicine",
issn = "0884-8734",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Supporting patient autonomy

T2 - The importance of clinician-patient relationships

AU - Entwistle, Vikki A.

AU - Carter, Stacy M.

AU - Cribb, Alan

AU - McCaffery, Kirsten

PY - 2010/7

Y1 - 2010/7

N2 - Personal autonomy is widely valued. Recognition of its vulnerability in health care contexts led to the inclusion of respect for autonomy as a key concern in biomedical ethics. The principle of respect for autonomy is usually associated with allowing or enabling patients to make their own decisions about which health care interventions they will or will not receive. In this paper, we suggest that a strong focus on decision situations is problematic, especially when combined with a tendency to stress the importance of patients' independence in choosing. It distracts attention from other important aspects of and challenges to autonomy in health care. Relational understandings of autonomy attempt to explain both the positive and negative implications of social relationships for individuals' autonomy. They suggest that many health care practices can affect autonomy by virtue of their effects not only on patients' treatment preferences and choices, but also on their self-identities, self-evaluations and capabilities for autonomy. Relational understandings de-emphasise independence and facilitate well-nuanced distinctions between forms of clinical communication that support and that undermine patients' autonomy. These understandings support recognition of the value of good patient-professional relationships and can enrich the specification of the principle of respect for autonomy.

AB - Personal autonomy is widely valued. Recognition of its vulnerability in health care contexts led to the inclusion of respect for autonomy as a key concern in biomedical ethics. The principle of respect for autonomy is usually associated with allowing or enabling patients to make their own decisions about which health care interventions they will or will not receive. In this paper, we suggest that a strong focus on decision situations is problematic, especially when combined with a tendency to stress the importance of patients' independence in choosing. It distracts attention from other important aspects of and challenges to autonomy in health care. Relational understandings of autonomy attempt to explain both the positive and negative implications of social relationships for individuals' autonomy. They suggest that many health care practices can affect autonomy by virtue of their effects not only on patients' treatment preferences and choices, but also on their self-identities, self-evaluations and capabilities for autonomy. Relational understandings de-emphasise independence and facilitate well-nuanced distinctions between forms of clinical communication that support and that undermine patients' autonomy. These understandings support recognition of the value of good patient-professional relationships and can enrich the specification of the principle of respect for autonomy.

KW - personal autonomy

KW - professional-patient relations

KW - clinical ethics

KW - relationship-centred care

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77954385459&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11606-010-1292-2

DO - 10.1007/s11606-010-1292-2

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:77954385459

VL - 25

SP - 741

EP - 745

JO - Journal of General Internal Medicine

JF - Journal of General Internal Medicine

SN - 0884-8734

IS - 7

ER -