Surface visions

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)
6 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Many disciplines in the arts and social sciences are currently redirecting their attention to surfaces, and ways of treating them, as primary conditions for the generation of meaning. With regard to visual perception, this has entailed a switch from its optical to its haptic modality. How does this switch affect the way surfaces are understood? It is argued that with haptic vision, the emphasis is not on conformation but texture, as revealed in flows of material composition and in patterns of self-shadowing – or in a word, in complexion. This makes the surface, whether of face, skin or landscape, quite distinct from that of a body or an object. Drawing on the ideas of John Ruskin, the haptically perceived surface is compared to a veil that is worn in the double sense of adornment and erosion, of affective expression and weathering. The article concludes that it is in the relations between such surfaces that social life is lived.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)99-108
Number of pages10
JournalTheory, Culture and Society
Volume34
Issue number7-8
Early online date10 Oct 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2017

Fingerprint

visual perception
erosion
social science
art

Keywords

  • complexion
  • haptic perception
  • Ruskin
  • surfaces
  • texture
  • vision

Cite this

Surface visions. / Ingold, Timothy.

In: Theory, Culture and Society, Vol. 34, No. 7-8, 12.2017, p. 99-108.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ingold, Timothy. / Surface visions. In: Theory, Culture and Society. 2017 ; Vol. 34, No. 7-8. pp. 99-108.
@article{881b203023dd49c4af198ff9bd9762a6,
title = "Surface visions",
abstract = "Many disciplines in the arts and social sciences are currently redirecting their attention to surfaces, and ways of treating them, as primary conditions for the generation of meaning. With regard to visual perception, this has entailed a switch from its optical to its haptic modality. How does this switch affect the way surfaces are understood? It is argued that with haptic vision, the emphasis is not on conformation but texture, as revealed in flows of material composition and in patterns of self-shadowing – or in a word, in complexion. This makes the surface, whether of face, skin or landscape, quite distinct from that of a body or an object. Drawing on the ideas of John Ruskin, the haptically perceived surface is compared to a veil that is worn in the double sense of adornment and erosion, of affective expression and weathering. The article concludes that it is in the relations between such surfaces that social life is lived.",
keywords = "complexion, haptic perception, Ruskin, surfaces, texture, vision",
author = "Timothy Ingold",
year = "2017",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1177/0263276417730601",
language = "English",
volume = "34",
pages = "99--108",
journal = "Theory, Culture and Society",
issn = "0263-2764",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "7-8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Surface visions

AU - Ingold, Timothy

PY - 2017/12

Y1 - 2017/12

N2 - Many disciplines in the arts and social sciences are currently redirecting their attention to surfaces, and ways of treating them, as primary conditions for the generation of meaning. With regard to visual perception, this has entailed a switch from its optical to its haptic modality. How does this switch affect the way surfaces are understood? It is argued that with haptic vision, the emphasis is not on conformation but texture, as revealed in flows of material composition and in patterns of self-shadowing – or in a word, in complexion. This makes the surface, whether of face, skin or landscape, quite distinct from that of a body or an object. Drawing on the ideas of John Ruskin, the haptically perceived surface is compared to a veil that is worn in the double sense of adornment and erosion, of affective expression and weathering. The article concludes that it is in the relations between such surfaces that social life is lived.

AB - Many disciplines in the arts and social sciences are currently redirecting their attention to surfaces, and ways of treating them, as primary conditions for the generation of meaning. With regard to visual perception, this has entailed a switch from its optical to its haptic modality. How does this switch affect the way surfaces are understood? It is argued that with haptic vision, the emphasis is not on conformation but texture, as revealed in flows of material composition and in patterns of self-shadowing – or in a word, in complexion. This makes the surface, whether of face, skin or landscape, quite distinct from that of a body or an object. Drawing on the ideas of John Ruskin, the haptically perceived surface is compared to a veil that is worn in the double sense of adornment and erosion, of affective expression and weathering. The article concludes that it is in the relations between such surfaces that social life is lived.

KW - complexion

KW - haptic perception

KW - Ruskin

KW - surfaces

KW - texture

KW - vision

U2 - 10.1177/0263276417730601

DO - 10.1177/0263276417730601

M3 - Article

VL - 34

SP - 99

EP - 108

JO - Theory, Culture and Society

JF - Theory, Culture and Society

SN - 0263-2764

IS - 7-8

ER -