Sustainable Energy Crop Production

Stephen Del Grosso, Pete Smith, Marcelo Galdos, Astley Hastings, William Parton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Biofuels currently supply a small portion of the world’s energy needs but this is increasing due to mandates intended to reduce use of fossil fuels and the associated environmental impacts. However, the potentials of plant based feedstocks to substitute for fossil fuels and mitigate environmental impacts are uncertain. Much of the uncertainty is related to the quantification of nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions from feedstock production and the extent to which use of grain and biomass for biofuel feedstocks leads to land use conversion for compensatory cropping (indirect land use change). Current consensus is that energy cane, perennial cellulosic crops, and waste biomass provide clear benefits while corn ethanol and oil seed crops may provide benefits if indirect land use change is assumed to be negligible and if recommended crop management practices, such as use of enhanced efficiency fertilizers and minimal tillage, are employed. Future research should better quantify N2O emissions from different feedstocks grown in different regions, the ability of best management practices to mitigate these emissions, and the potential for marginal lands and increased crop yields to supply biomass .

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)20-25
Number of pages6
JournalCurrent Opinion in Environmental Sustainability
Volume9-10
Early online date9 Aug 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2014

Fingerprint

energy crop
energy production
crop production
land use
biofuel
crop
fossil fuel
land use change
environmental impact
biomass
energy
best management practice
nitrous oxide
quantification
management
crop yield
tillage
agricultural product
cropping practice
ethanol

Keywords

  • energy crops, sugar cane, maize,
  • oil seed rape, palm oil,
  • ethanol, biodiesel
  • biorefining, cellulosic alchohol

Cite this

Sustainable Energy Crop Production. / Del Grosso, Stephen; Smith, Pete; Galdos, Marcelo; Hastings, Astley; Parton, William.

In: Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, Vol. 9-10, 10.2014, p. 20-25.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Del Grosso, Stephen ; Smith, Pete ; Galdos, Marcelo ; Hastings, Astley ; Parton, William. / Sustainable Energy Crop Production. In: Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 2014 ; Vol. 9-10. pp. 20-25.
@article{997834b058cc404c821519d074dab540,
title = "Sustainable Energy Crop Production",
abstract = "Biofuels currently supply a small portion of the world’s energy needs but this is increasing due to mandates intended to reduce use of fossil fuels and the associated environmental impacts. However, the potentials of plant based feedstocks to substitute for fossil fuels and mitigate environmental impacts are uncertain. Much of the uncertainty is related to the quantification of nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions from feedstock production and the extent to which use of grain and biomass for biofuel feedstocks leads to land use conversion for compensatory cropping (indirect land use change). Current consensus is that energy cane, perennial cellulosic crops, and waste biomass provide clear benefits while corn ethanol and oil seed crops may provide benefits if indirect land use change is assumed to be negligible and if recommended crop management practices, such as use of enhanced efficiency fertilizers and minimal tillage, are employed. Future research should better quantify N2O emissions from different feedstocks grown in different regions, the ability of best management practices to mitigate these emissions, and the potential for marginal lands and increased crop yields to supply biomass .",
keywords = "energy crops, sugar cane, maize, , oil seed rape, palm oil, , ethanol, biodiesel, biorefining, cellulosic alchohol",
author = "{Del Grosso}, Stephen and Pete Smith and Marcelo Galdos and Astley Hastings and William Parton",
note = "Acknowledgements We acknowledge funding from the North Central Regional Sun Grant Center at South Dakota State University through a grant provided by the US Department of Energy Office of Biomass Programs under award number DE-FG36-08GO88073. The contribution of PS was supported by the UK Energy Research Center (UKERC) award: Integrated approaches to ecosystem services and energy: assessing the global and local impacts on ecosystem services of energy provision in the UK. The contribution of MG was supported by grant 2012/06933-6 from S{\~a}o Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP).",
year = "2014",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1016/j.cosust.2014.07.007",
language = "English",
volume = "9-10",
pages = "20--25",
journal = "Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability",
issn = "1877-3435",
publisher = "ELSEVIER APPL SCI PUBL LTD",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sustainable Energy Crop Production

AU - Del Grosso, Stephen

AU - Smith, Pete

AU - Galdos, Marcelo

AU - Hastings, Astley

AU - Parton, William

N1 - Acknowledgements We acknowledge funding from the North Central Regional Sun Grant Center at South Dakota State University through a grant provided by the US Department of Energy Office of Biomass Programs under award number DE-FG36-08GO88073. The contribution of PS was supported by the UK Energy Research Center (UKERC) award: Integrated approaches to ecosystem services and energy: assessing the global and local impacts on ecosystem services of energy provision in the UK. The contribution of MG was supported by grant 2012/06933-6 from São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP).

PY - 2014/10

Y1 - 2014/10

N2 - Biofuels currently supply a small portion of the world’s energy needs but this is increasing due to mandates intended to reduce use of fossil fuels and the associated environmental impacts. However, the potentials of plant based feedstocks to substitute for fossil fuels and mitigate environmental impacts are uncertain. Much of the uncertainty is related to the quantification of nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions from feedstock production and the extent to which use of grain and biomass for biofuel feedstocks leads to land use conversion for compensatory cropping (indirect land use change). Current consensus is that energy cane, perennial cellulosic crops, and waste biomass provide clear benefits while corn ethanol and oil seed crops may provide benefits if indirect land use change is assumed to be negligible and if recommended crop management practices, such as use of enhanced efficiency fertilizers and minimal tillage, are employed. Future research should better quantify N2O emissions from different feedstocks grown in different regions, the ability of best management practices to mitigate these emissions, and the potential for marginal lands and increased crop yields to supply biomass .

AB - Biofuels currently supply a small portion of the world’s energy needs but this is increasing due to mandates intended to reduce use of fossil fuels and the associated environmental impacts. However, the potentials of plant based feedstocks to substitute for fossil fuels and mitigate environmental impacts are uncertain. Much of the uncertainty is related to the quantification of nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions from feedstock production and the extent to which use of grain and biomass for biofuel feedstocks leads to land use conversion for compensatory cropping (indirect land use change). Current consensus is that energy cane, perennial cellulosic crops, and waste biomass provide clear benefits while corn ethanol and oil seed crops may provide benefits if indirect land use change is assumed to be negligible and if recommended crop management practices, such as use of enhanced efficiency fertilizers and minimal tillage, are employed. Future research should better quantify N2O emissions from different feedstocks grown in different regions, the ability of best management practices to mitigate these emissions, and the potential for marginal lands and increased crop yields to supply biomass .

KW - energy crops, sugar cane, maize,

KW - oil seed rape, palm oil,

KW - ethanol, biodiesel

KW - biorefining, cellulosic alchohol

U2 - 10.1016/j.cosust.2014.07.007

DO - 10.1016/j.cosust.2014.07.007

M3 - Article

VL - 9-10

SP - 20

EP - 25

JO - Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability

JF - Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability

SN - 1877-3435

ER -