Sustainable maternity services in remote and rural Scotland

a qualitative survey of staff views on required skills, competencies and training

Janet Stephen Tucker, Vanora Hundley, Alice Kiger, Helen M M Bryers, Jane Lindsay Caldow, Jane Farmer, Fiona Margaret Harris, Jillian Ireland, Edwin Van Teijlingen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

30 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: To explore staff views on their roles, skills and training to deliver high quality and local intrapartum services in remote and rural settings against national recommendations.
Design: Interview and postal survey.
Setting: A stratified representative sample of remote and rural maternity units in Scotland ( December 2002 to May 2003).
Participants: Staff proportionally representative of professional groups involved in maternity care.
Results: Staff interviews took place at 11 units ( response rate 93%). A subsequent postal survey included the interview sample and staff in a further 11 units ( response rate 78%). Medical specialisation, workforce issues, and proposed regulatory evaluation of competencies linked to throughput raised concerns about the sustainability and safety of services, particularly for "generalists'' in rural maternity care teams and for medical cover in small district general hospitals with large rural catchments. Risk assessment and decision making to transfer were seen as central for effective rural practice and these were influenced by rural context. Staff self-reported competence and confidence varied according to procedure, but noted service change appeared to be underway ahead of their preparedness. Self-reported competence in managing obstetric emergencies was surprisingly high, with the caveat that they were not independently assessed in this study. Staff with access to video conference technology reported low actual use although there was enthusiasm about its potential use.
Conclusions: Considerable uncertainties remain around staffing models and training to maintain maternity care team skills and competencies. Further research is required to test how this will impact on safety, appropriateness, and access and acceptability to rural communities.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)34-40
Number of pages7
JournalQuality & safety in health care
Volume14
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2005

Cite this

Sustainable maternity services in remote and rural Scotland : a qualitative survey of staff views on required skills, competencies and training. / Tucker, Janet Stephen; Hundley, Vanora; Kiger, Alice; Bryers, Helen M M; Caldow, Jane Lindsay; Farmer, Jane; Harris, Fiona Margaret; Ireland, Jillian; Van Teijlingen, Edwin.

In: Quality & safety in health care, Vol. 14, No. 1, 02.2005, p. 34-40.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Tucker, Janet Stephen ; Hundley, Vanora ; Kiger, Alice ; Bryers, Helen M M ; Caldow, Jane Lindsay ; Farmer, Jane ; Harris, Fiona Margaret ; Ireland, Jillian ; Van Teijlingen, Edwin. / Sustainable maternity services in remote and rural Scotland : a qualitative survey of staff views on required skills, competencies and training. In: Quality & safety in health care. 2005 ; Vol. 14, No. 1. pp. 34-40.
@article{c004d2004efe4b8a8bf1d3bc4191b1f7,
title = "Sustainable maternity services in remote and rural Scotland: a qualitative survey of staff views on required skills, competencies and training",
abstract = "Objectives: To explore staff views on their roles, skills and training to deliver high quality and local intrapartum services in remote and rural settings against national recommendations. Design: Interview and postal survey. Setting: A stratified representative sample of remote and rural maternity units in Scotland ( December 2002 to May 2003). Participants: Staff proportionally representative of professional groups involved in maternity care. Results: Staff interviews took place at 11 units ( response rate 93{\%}). A subsequent postal survey included the interview sample and staff in a further 11 units ( response rate 78{\%}). Medical specialisation, workforce issues, and proposed regulatory evaluation of competencies linked to throughput raised concerns about the sustainability and safety of services, particularly for {"}generalists'' in rural maternity care teams and for medical cover in small district general hospitals with large rural catchments. Risk assessment and decision making to transfer were seen as central for effective rural practice and these were influenced by rural context. Staff self-reported competence and confidence varied according to procedure, but noted service change appeared to be underway ahead of their preparedness. Self-reported competence in managing obstetric emergencies was surprisingly high, with the caveat that they were not independently assessed in this study. Staff with access to video conference technology reported low actual use although there was enthusiasm about its potential use. Conclusions: Considerable uncertainties remain around staffing models and training to maintain maternity care team skills and competencies. Further research is required to test how this will impact on safety, appropriateness, and access and acceptability to rural communities.",
author = "Tucker, {Janet Stephen} and Vanora Hundley and Alice Kiger and Bryers, {Helen M M} and Caldow, {Jane Lindsay} and Jane Farmer and Harris, {Fiona Margaret} and Jillian Ireland and {Van Teijlingen}, Edwin",
year = "2005",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1136/qshc.2004.010561",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "34--40",
journal = "Quality & safety in health care",
issn = "1475-3898",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sustainable maternity services in remote and rural Scotland

T2 - a qualitative survey of staff views on required skills, competencies and training

AU - Tucker, Janet Stephen

AU - Hundley, Vanora

AU - Kiger, Alice

AU - Bryers, Helen M M

AU - Caldow, Jane Lindsay

AU - Farmer, Jane

AU - Harris, Fiona Margaret

AU - Ireland, Jillian

AU - Van Teijlingen, Edwin

PY - 2005/2

Y1 - 2005/2

N2 - Objectives: To explore staff views on their roles, skills and training to deliver high quality and local intrapartum services in remote and rural settings against national recommendations. Design: Interview and postal survey. Setting: A stratified representative sample of remote and rural maternity units in Scotland ( December 2002 to May 2003). Participants: Staff proportionally representative of professional groups involved in maternity care. Results: Staff interviews took place at 11 units ( response rate 93%). A subsequent postal survey included the interview sample and staff in a further 11 units ( response rate 78%). Medical specialisation, workforce issues, and proposed regulatory evaluation of competencies linked to throughput raised concerns about the sustainability and safety of services, particularly for "generalists'' in rural maternity care teams and for medical cover in small district general hospitals with large rural catchments. Risk assessment and decision making to transfer were seen as central for effective rural practice and these were influenced by rural context. Staff self-reported competence and confidence varied according to procedure, but noted service change appeared to be underway ahead of their preparedness. Self-reported competence in managing obstetric emergencies was surprisingly high, with the caveat that they were not independently assessed in this study. Staff with access to video conference technology reported low actual use although there was enthusiasm about its potential use. Conclusions: Considerable uncertainties remain around staffing models and training to maintain maternity care team skills and competencies. Further research is required to test how this will impact on safety, appropriateness, and access and acceptability to rural communities.

AB - Objectives: To explore staff views on their roles, skills and training to deliver high quality and local intrapartum services in remote and rural settings against national recommendations. Design: Interview and postal survey. Setting: A stratified representative sample of remote and rural maternity units in Scotland ( December 2002 to May 2003). Participants: Staff proportionally representative of professional groups involved in maternity care. Results: Staff interviews took place at 11 units ( response rate 93%). A subsequent postal survey included the interview sample and staff in a further 11 units ( response rate 78%). Medical specialisation, workforce issues, and proposed regulatory evaluation of competencies linked to throughput raised concerns about the sustainability and safety of services, particularly for "generalists'' in rural maternity care teams and for medical cover in small district general hospitals with large rural catchments. Risk assessment and decision making to transfer were seen as central for effective rural practice and these were influenced by rural context. Staff self-reported competence and confidence varied according to procedure, but noted service change appeared to be underway ahead of their preparedness. Self-reported competence in managing obstetric emergencies was surprisingly high, with the caveat that they were not independently assessed in this study. Staff with access to video conference technology reported low actual use although there was enthusiasm about its potential use. Conclusions: Considerable uncertainties remain around staffing models and training to maintain maternity care team skills and competencies. Further research is required to test how this will impact on safety, appropriateness, and access and acceptability to rural communities.

U2 - 10.1136/qshc.2004.010561

DO - 10.1136/qshc.2004.010561

M3 - Article

VL - 14

SP - 34

EP - 40

JO - Quality & safety in health care

JF - Quality & safety in health care

SN - 1475-3898

IS - 1

ER -