Syntactic alignment and participant role in dialogue

Holly P. Branigan, Martin J. Pickering, Janet F. McLean, Alexandra Alice Cleland

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

88 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We report three experiments that investigated whether the linguistic behavior of participants in a dialogue is affected by their role within that interaction. All experiments were concerned with the way in which speakers choose between syntactic forms with very similar meanings. Theories of dialogue assume that speakers address their contributions directly to their addressees, but also indirectly to side participants. In Experiments 1 and 2, speakers produced picture descriptions that had the same syntactic structure as a previous speaker's descriptions which had been addressed to a third person. This indicated that syntactic alignment is not limited to speaker-addressee dyads. However, the prior participant role of the current speaker affected alignment: prior addressees aligned more than prior side-participants. In contrast, Experiments 2 and 3 demonstrated that alignment was unaffected by the prior participant role of the current addressee. We interpret these findings in terms of depth of processing during encoding.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)163-197
Number of pages35
JournalCognition
Volume104
Issue number2
Early online date31 Jul 2006
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2007

Keywords

  • dialogue
  • syntax
  • participant role
  • alignment
  • syntactic priming
  • language production
  • social-interaction
  • conceptual pacts
  • audience design
  • conversation
  • coordination
  • speakers
  • persistence
  • memory
  • representation

Cite this