Systematic review of factors influencing patient and practitioner delay in diagnosis of upper gastrointestinal cancer

S. Macdonald, U. MacLeod, Neil Crawford Campbell, D. Weller, E. Mitchell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

88 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

As knowledge on the causation of cancers advances and new treatments are developed, early recognition and accurate diagnosis becomes increasingly important. This review focused on identifying factors influencing patient and primary care practitioner delay for upper gastrointestinal cancer. A systematic methodology was applied, including extensive searches of the literature published from 1970 to 2003, systematic data extraction, quality assessment and narrative data synthesis. Included studies were those evaluating factors associated with the time interval between a patient first noticing a cancer symptom and presenting to primary care, between a patient first presenting to primary care and being referred to secondary care, or describing an intervention designed to reduce those intervals. Twenty-five studies were included in the review. Studies reporting delay intervals demonstrated that the patient phase of delay was greater than the practitioner phase, whilst patient-related research suggests that recognition of symptom seriousness is more important than recognition of the presence of the symptom. The main factors related to practitioner delay were misdiagnosis, application and interpretation of tests, and the confounding effect of existing disease. Greater understanding of patient factors is required, along with evaluation of interventions to ensure appropriate diagnosis, examination and investigation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1272-1280
Number of pages8
JournalBritish Journal of Cancer
Volume94
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2006

Keywords

  • delay
  • diagnosis
  • systematic review
  • upper gastrointestinal
  • GASTRIC-CANCER
  • BREAST-CANCER
  • SYMPTOMS
  • PHYSICIAN
  • SURVIVAL
  • CARCINOMA
  • INTERVAL
  • ONSET

Cite this

Systematic review of factors influencing patient and practitioner delay in diagnosis of upper gastrointestinal cancer. / Macdonald, S.; MacLeod, U.; Campbell, Neil Crawford; Weller, D.; Mitchell, E.

In: British Journal of Cancer, Vol. 94, 04.2006, p. 1272-1280.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Macdonald, S. ; MacLeod, U. ; Campbell, Neil Crawford ; Weller, D. ; Mitchell, E. / Systematic review of factors influencing patient and practitioner delay in diagnosis of upper gastrointestinal cancer. In: British Journal of Cancer. 2006 ; Vol. 94. pp. 1272-1280.
@article{9a649b30c229454480475046fb91a11b,
title = "Systematic review of factors influencing patient and practitioner delay in diagnosis of upper gastrointestinal cancer",
abstract = "As knowledge on the causation of cancers advances and new treatments are developed, early recognition and accurate diagnosis becomes increasingly important. This review focused on identifying factors influencing patient and primary care practitioner delay for upper gastrointestinal cancer. A systematic methodology was applied, including extensive searches of the literature published from 1970 to 2003, systematic data extraction, quality assessment and narrative data synthesis. Included studies were those evaluating factors associated with the time interval between a patient first noticing a cancer symptom and presenting to primary care, between a patient first presenting to primary care and being referred to secondary care, or describing an intervention designed to reduce those intervals. Twenty-five studies were included in the review. Studies reporting delay intervals demonstrated that the patient phase of delay was greater than the practitioner phase, whilst patient-related research suggests that recognition of symptom seriousness is more important than recognition of the presence of the symptom. The main factors related to practitioner delay were misdiagnosis, application and interpretation of tests, and the confounding effect of existing disease. Greater understanding of patient factors is required, along with evaluation of interventions to ensure appropriate diagnosis, examination and investigation.",
keywords = "delay, diagnosis, systematic review, upper gastrointestinal, GASTRIC-CANCER, BREAST-CANCER, SYMPTOMS, PHYSICIAN, SURVIVAL, CARCINOMA, INTERVAL, ONSET",
author = "S. Macdonald and U. MacLeod and Campbell, {Neil Crawford} and D. Weller and E. Mitchell",
year = "2006",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1038/sj.bjc.6603089",
language = "English",
volume = "94",
pages = "1272--1280",
journal = "British Journal of Cancer",
issn = "0007-0920",
publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Systematic review of factors influencing patient and practitioner delay in diagnosis of upper gastrointestinal cancer

AU - Macdonald, S.

AU - MacLeod, U.

AU - Campbell, Neil Crawford

AU - Weller, D.

AU - Mitchell, E.

PY - 2006/4

Y1 - 2006/4

N2 - As knowledge on the causation of cancers advances and new treatments are developed, early recognition and accurate diagnosis becomes increasingly important. This review focused on identifying factors influencing patient and primary care practitioner delay for upper gastrointestinal cancer. A systematic methodology was applied, including extensive searches of the literature published from 1970 to 2003, systematic data extraction, quality assessment and narrative data synthesis. Included studies were those evaluating factors associated with the time interval between a patient first noticing a cancer symptom and presenting to primary care, between a patient first presenting to primary care and being referred to secondary care, or describing an intervention designed to reduce those intervals. Twenty-five studies were included in the review. Studies reporting delay intervals demonstrated that the patient phase of delay was greater than the practitioner phase, whilst patient-related research suggests that recognition of symptom seriousness is more important than recognition of the presence of the symptom. The main factors related to practitioner delay were misdiagnosis, application and interpretation of tests, and the confounding effect of existing disease. Greater understanding of patient factors is required, along with evaluation of interventions to ensure appropriate diagnosis, examination and investigation.

AB - As knowledge on the causation of cancers advances and new treatments are developed, early recognition and accurate diagnosis becomes increasingly important. This review focused on identifying factors influencing patient and primary care practitioner delay for upper gastrointestinal cancer. A systematic methodology was applied, including extensive searches of the literature published from 1970 to 2003, systematic data extraction, quality assessment and narrative data synthesis. Included studies were those evaluating factors associated with the time interval between a patient first noticing a cancer symptom and presenting to primary care, between a patient first presenting to primary care and being referred to secondary care, or describing an intervention designed to reduce those intervals. Twenty-five studies were included in the review. Studies reporting delay intervals demonstrated that the patient phase of delay was greater than the practitioner phase, whilst patient-related research suggests that recognition of symptom seriousness is more important than recognition of the presence of the symptom. The main factors related to practitioner delay were misdiagnosis, application and interpretation of tests, and the confounding effect of existing disease. Greater understanding of patient factors is required, along with evaluation of interventions to ensure appropriate diagnosis, examination and investigation.

KW - delay

KW - diagnosis

KW - systematic review

KW - upper gastrointestinal

KW - GASTRIC-CANCER

KW - BREAST-CANCER

KW - SYMPTOMS

KW - PHYSICIAN

KW - SURVIVAL

KW - CARCINOMA

KW - INTERVAL

KW - ONSET

U2 - 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603089

DO - 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603089

M3 - Article

VL - 94

SP - 1272

EP - 1280

JO - British Journal of Cancer

JF - British Journal of Cancer

SN - 0007-0920

ER -