Systematically missing confounders in individual participant data meta-analysis of observational cohort studies

Amanda Lee, Fibrinogen Studies Collaboration

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

32 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

One difficulty in performing meta-analyses of observational cohort studies is that the availability of confounders may vary between cohorts, so that some cohorts provide fully adjusted analyses while others only provide partially adjusted analyses. Commonly, analyses of the association between an exposure and disease either are restricted to cohorts with full confounder information, or use all cohorts but do not fully adjust for confounding. We propose using a bivariate random-effects meta-analysis model to use information from all available cohorts while still adjusting for all the potential confounders. Our method uses both the fully adjusted and the partially adjusted estimated effects in the cohorts with full confounder information, together with an estimate of their within-cohort correlation. The method is applied to estimate the association between fibrinogen level and coronary heart disease incidence using data from 154 012 participants in 31 cohorts.† One hundred and ninety-nine participants from the original 154 211 withdrew their consent and have been removed from this analysis. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1218-1237
Number of pages20
JournalStatistics in Medicine
Volume28
Issue number8
Early online date16 Feb 2009
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Apr 2009

Fingerprint

Cohort Study
Observational Studies
Meta-Analysis
Cohort Studies
Cohort Effect
Fibrinogen
Coronary Disease
Coronary Heart Disease
Confounding
Model Analysis
Random Effects
Estimate
Incidence
Availability
Vary

Keywords

  • meta-analysis
  • survival analysis
  • confounders
  • observational studies
  • missing covariates

Cite this

Systematically missing confounders in individual participant data meta-analysis of observational cohort studies. / Lee, Amanda; Fibrinogen Studies Collaboration.

In: Statistics in Medicine, Vol. 28, No. 8, 15.04.2009, p. 1218-1237.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5349a478c3574d23950859dcd4086ab4,
title = "Systematically missing confounders in individual participant data meta-analysis of observational cohort studies",
abstract = "One difficulty in performing meta-analyses of observational cohort studies is that the availability of confounders may vary between cohorts, so that some cohorts provide fully adjusted analyses while others only provide partially adjusted analyses. Commonly, analyses of the association between an exposure and disease either are restricted to cohorts with full confounder information, or use all cohorts but do not fully adjust for confounding. We propose using a bivariate random-effects meta-analysis model to use information from all available cohorts while still adjusting for all the potential confounders. Our method uses both the fully adjusted and the partially adjusted estimated effects in the cohorts with full confounder information, together with an estimate of their within-cohort correlation. The method is applied to estimate the association between fibrinogen level and coronary heart disease incidence using data from 154 012 participants in 31 cohorts.† One hundred and ninety-nine participants from the original 154 211 withdrew their consent and have been removed from this analysis. Copyright {\circledC} 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.",
keywords = "meta-analysis, survival analysis, confounders, observational studies, missing covariates",
author = "Amanda Lee and {Fibrinogen Studies Collaboration}",
year = "2009",
month = "4",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1002/sim.3540",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "1218--1237",
journal = "Statistics in Medicine",
issn = "0277-6715",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Systematically missing confounders in individual participant data meta-analysis of observational cohort studies

AU - Lee, Amanda

AU - Fibrinogen Studies Collaboration

PY - 2009/4/15

Y1 - 2009/4/15

N2 - One difficulty in performing meta-analyses of observational cohort studies is that the availability of confounders may vary between cohorts, so that some cohorts provide fully adjusted analyses while others only provide partially adjusted analyses. Commonly, analyses of the association between an exposure and disease either are restricted to cohorts with full confounder information, or use all cohorts but do not fully adjust for confounding. We propose using a bivariate random-effects meta-analysis model to use information from all available cohorts while still adjusting for all the potential confounders. Our method uses both the fully adjusted and the partially adjusted estimated effects in the cohorts with full confounder information, together with an estimate of their within-cohort correlation. The method is applied to estimate the association between fibrinogen level and coronary heart disease incidence using data from 154 012 participants in 31 cohorts.† One hundred and ninety-nine participants from the original 154 211 withdrew their consent and have been removed from this analysis. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

AB - One difficulty in performing meta-analyses of observational cohort studies is that the availability of confounders may vary between cohorts, so that some cohorts provide fully adjusted analyses while others only provide partially adjusted analyses. Commonly, analyses of the association between an exposure and disease either are restricted to cohorts with full confounder information, or use all cohorts but do not fully adjust for confounding. We propose using a bivariate random-effects meta-analysis model to use information from all available cohorts while still adjusting for all the potential confounders. Our method uses both the fully adjusted and the partially adjusted estimated effects in the cohorts with full confounder information, together with an estimate of their within-cohort correlation. The method is applied to estimate the association between fibrinogen level and coronary heart disease incidence using data from 154 012 participants in 31 cohorts.† One hundred and ninety-nine participants from the original 154 211 withdrew their consent and have been removed from this analysis. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

KW - meta-analysis

KW - survival analysis

KW - confounders

KW - observational studies

KW - missing covariates

U2 - 10.1002/sim.3540

DO - 10.1002/sim.3540

M3 - Article

VL - 28

SP - 1218

EP - 1237

JO - Statistics in Medicine

JF - Statistics in Medicine

SN - 0277-6715

IS - 8

ER -