Tablet computers in assessing performance in a high stakes exam

opinion matters

G. P. Currie, S. Sinha, F. Thomson, J. Cleland, A. R. Denison

Research output: Contribution to journalAbstract

2 Citations (Scopus)
9 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background Tablet computers have emerged as a tool to capture, process and store data in examinations, yet evidence relating to their acceptability and usefulness in assessment is limited. 
Methods We performed an observational study to explore opinions and attitudes relating to tablet computer use in recording performance in a nal year objective structured clinical examination at a single UK medical school. Examiners completed a short questionnaire encompassing background, forced-choice and open questions. Forced choice questions were analysed using descriptive statistics and open questions by framework analysis. 
Results Ninety-two (97% response rate) examiners completed the questionnaire of whom 85% had previous use of tablet computers. Ninety per cent felt checklist mark allocation was ‘very/quite easy’, while approximately half considered recording ‘free-type’ comments was ‘easy/very easy’. Greater overall ef ciency of marking and resource savings were considered the main advantages of tablet computers, while concerns relating to technological failure and ability to record free type comments were raised. 
Discussion In a context where examiners were familiar with tablet computers, they were preferred to paper checklists, although concerns were raised. This study adds to the limited literature underpinning the use of electronic devices as acceptable tools in objective structured clinical examinations. 
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)164-167
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh
Volume47
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2017

Fingerprint

examiner
performance
examination
recording
questionnaire
descriptive statistics
savings
electronics
resources
school
evidence

Keywords

  • assessment
  • technology

Cite this

Tablet computers in assessing performance in a high stakes exam : opinion matters. / Currie, G. P.; Sinha, S.; Thomson, F.; Cleland, J.; Denison, A. R.

In: Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh, Vol. 47, No. 2, 06.2017, p. 164-167.

Research output: Contribution to journalAbstract

@article{ee7fdc9547294bb697a291ebe6361568,
title = "Tablet computers in assessing performance in a high stakes exam: opinion matters",
abstract = "Background Tablet computers have emerged as a tool to capture, process and store data in examinations, yet evidence relating to their acceptability and usefulness in assessment is limited. Methods We performed an observational study to explore opinions and attitudes relating to tablet computer use in recording performance in a nal year objective structured clinical examination at a single UK medical school. Examiners completed a short questionnaire encompassing background, forced-choice and open questions. Forced choice questions were analysed using descriptive statistics and open questions by framework analysis. Results Ninety-two (97{\%} response rate) examiners completed the questionnaire of whom 85{\%} had previous use of tablet computers. Ninety per cent felt checklist mark allocation was ‘very/quite easy’, while approximately half considered recording ‘free-type’ comments was ‘easy/very easy’. Greater overall ef ciency of marking and resource savings were considered the main advantages of tablet computers, while concerns relating to technological failure and ability to record free type comments were raised. Discussion In a context where examiners were familiar with tablet computers, they were preferred to paper checklists, although concerns were raised. This study adds to the limited literature underpinning the use of electronic devices as acceptable tools in objective structured clinical examinations. ",
keywords = "assessment, technology",
author = "Currie, {G. P.} and S. Sinha and F. Thomson and J. Cleland and Denison, {A. R.}",
note = "The authors would like to thank Dr Craig brown, University of Aberdeen for assistance with data analysis.",
year = "2017",
month = "6",
doi = "10.4997/JRCPE.2017.215",
language = "English",
volume = "47",
pages = "164--167",
journal = "Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh",
issn = "1478-2715",
publisher = "Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Tablet computers in assessing performance in a high stakes exam

T2 - opinion matters

AU - Currie, G. P.

AU - Sinha, S.

AU - Thomson, F.

AU - Cleland, J.

AU - Denison, A. R.

N1 - The authors would like to thank Dr Craig brown, University of Aberdeen for assistance with data analysis.

PY - 2017/6

Y1 - 2017/6

N2 - Background Tablet computers have emerged as a tool to capture, process and store data in examinations, yet evidence relating to their acceptability and usefulness in assessment is limited. Methods We performed an observational study to explore opinions and attitudes relating to tablet computer use in recording performance in a nal year objective structured clinical examination at a single UK medical school. Examiners completed a short questionnaire encompassing background, forced-choice and open questions. Forced choice questions were analysed using descriptive statistics and open questions by framework analysis. Results Ninety-two (97% response rate) examiners completed the questionnaire of whom 85% had previous use of tablet computers. Ninety per cent felt checklist mark allocation was ‘very/quite easy’, while approximately half considered recording ‘free-type’ comments was ‘easy/very easy’. Greater overall ef ciency of marking and resource savings were considered the main advantages of tablet computers, while concerns relating to technological failure and ability to record free type comments were raised. Discussion In a context where examiners were familiar with tablet computers, they were preferred to paper checklists, although concerns were raised. This study adds to the limited literature underpinning the use of electronic devices as acceptable tools in objective structured clinical examinations. 

AB - Background Tablet computers have emerged as a tool to capture, process and store data in examinations, yet evidence relating to their acceptability and usefulness in assessment is limited. Methods We performed an observational study to explore opinions and attitudes relating to tablet computer use in recording performance in a nal year objective structured clinical examination at a single UK medical school. Examiners completed a short questionnaire encompassing background, forced-choice and open questions. Forced choice questions were analysed using descriptive statistics and open questions by framework analysis. Results Ninety-two (97% response rate) examiners completed the questionnaire of whom 85% had previous use of tablet computers. Ninety per cent felt checklist mark allocation was ‘very/quite easy’, while approximately half considered recording ‘free-type’ comments was ‘easy/very easy’. Greater overall ef ciency of marking and resource savings were considered the main advantages of tablet computers, while concerns relating to technological failure and ability to record free type comments were raised. Discussion In a context where examiners were familiar with tablet computers, they were preferred to paper checklists, although concerns were raised. This study adds to the limited literature underpinning the use of electronic devices as acceptable tools in objective structured clinical examinations. 

KW - assessment

KW - technology

U2 - 10.4997/JRCPE.2017.215

DO - 10.4997/JRCPE.2017.215

M3 - Abstract

VL - 47

SP - 164

EP - 167

JO - Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh

JF - Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh

SN - 1478-2715

IS - 2

ER -