Tackling health inequalities in post-devolution Britain

do targets matter?

Tim Blackman, Eva Elliott, Alexandra Greene, Barbara Harrington, David Hunter, Linda Marks, Lorna McKee, Kat Smith, John Williams

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Since devolution in 1998, many aspects of public policy in Great Britain have diverged between England, Scotland and Wales, including how targets and performance assessment are used in the National Health Service and local government. Health inequality is an example where all three countries have recognized a need to act but approaches to performance assessment differ. Based on interviews with senior managers, the complexity of health inequality as an object of local intervention is explored and compared. Despite contrasting approaches to targets, local discourses in all three countries had significant similarities. Health inequality had to compete against a preoccupation with improving access to acute services generally and balancing budgets over the short term. There was a bias in the interventions described towards targeting health behaviours, but with limited use of evidence about efficacy, and indications that measuring progress with reducing health inequalities was starting to lead to an emphasis on 'quick wins' from pharmacological interventions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)762-778
Number of pages17
JournalPublic Administration
Volume87
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2009

Keywords

  • care
  • policy
  • performance
  • English

Cite this

Blackman, T., Elliott, E., Greene, A., Harrington, B., Hunter, D., Marks, L., ... Williams, J. (2009). Tackling health inequalities in post-devolution Britain: do targets matter? Public Administration, 87(4), 762-778. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2009.01782.x

Tackling health inequalities in post-devolution Britain : do targets matter? / Blackman, Tim; Elliott, Eva; Greene, Alexandra; Harrington, Barbara; Hunter, David; Marks, Linda; McKee, Lorna; Smith, Kat; Williams, John.

In: Public Administration, Vol. 87, No. 4, 12.2009, p. 762-778.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Blackman, T, Elliott, E, Greene, A, Harrington, B, Hunter, D, Marks, L, McKee, L, Smith, K & Williams, J 2009, 'Tackling health inequalities in post-devolution Britain: do targets matter?', Public Administration, vol. 87, no. 4, pp. 762-778. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2009.01782.x
Blackman T, Elliott E, Greene A, Harrington B, Hunter D, Marks L et al. Tackling health inequalities in post-devolution Britain: do targets matter? Public Administration. 2009 Dec;87(4):762-778. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2009.01782.x
Blackman, Tim ; Elliott, Eva ; Greene, Alexandra ; Harrington, Barbara ; Hunter, David ; Marks, Linda ; McKee, Lorna ; Smith, Kat ; Williams, John. / Tackling health inequalities in post-devolution Britain : do targets matter?. In: Public Administration. 2009 ; Vol. 87, No. 4. pp. 762-778.
@article{b3ab7c9d382b44de80d1af7dd151cca1,
title = "Tackling health inequalities in post-devolution Britain: do targets matter?",
abstract = "Since devolution in 1998, many aspects of public policy in Great Britain have diverged between England, Scotland and Wales, including how targets and performance assessment are used in the National Health Service and local government. Health inequality is an example where all three countries have recognized a need to act but approaches to performance assessment differ. Based on interviews with senior managers, the complexity of health inequality as an object of local intervention is explored and compared. Despite contrasting approaches to targets, local discourses in all three countries had significant similarities. Health inequality had to compete against a preoccupation with improving access to acute services generally and balancing budgets over the short term. There was a bias in the interventions described towards targeting health behaviours, but with limited use of evidence about efficacy, and indications that measuring progress with reducing health inequalities was starting to lead to an emphasis on 'quick wins' from pharmacological interventions.",
keywords = "care, policy, performance, English",
author = "Tim Blackman and Eva Elliott and Alexandra Greene and Barbara Harrington and David Hunter and Linda Marks and Lorna McKee and Kat Smith and John Williams",
year = "2009",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1111/j.1467-9299.2009.01782.x",
language = "English",
volume = "87",
pages = "762--778",
journal = "Public Administration",
issn = "0033-3298",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Tackling health inequalities in post-devolution Britain

T2 - do targets matter?

AU - Blackman, Tim

AU - Elliott, Eva

AU - Greene, Alexandra

AU - Harrington, Barbara

AU - Hunter, David

AU - Marks, Linda

AU - McKee, Lorna

AU - Smith, Kat

AU - Williams, John

PY - 2009/12

Y1 - 2009/12

N2 - Since devolution in 1998, many aspects of public policy in Great Britain have diverged between England, Scotland and Wales, including how targets and performance assessment are used in the National Health Service and local government. Health inequality is an example where all three countries have recognized a need to act but approaches to performance assessment differ. Based on interviews with senior managers, the complexity of health inequality as an object of local intervention is explored and compared. Despite contrasting approaches to targets, local discourses in all three countries had significant similarities. Health inequality had to compete against a preoccupation with improving access to acute services generally and balancing budgets over the short term. There was a bias in the interventions described towards targeting health behaviours, but with limited use of evidence about efficacy, and indications that measuring progress with reducing health inequalities was starting to lead to an emphasis on 'quick wins' from pharmacological interventions.

AB - Since devolution in 1998, many aspects of public policy in Great Britain have diverged between England, Scotland and Wales, including how targets and performance assessment are used in the National Health Service and local government. Health inequality is an example where all three countries have recognized a need to act but approaches to performance assessment differ. Based on interviews with senior managers, the complexity of health inequality as an object of local intervention is explored and compared. Despite contrasting approaches to targets, local discourses in all three countries had significant similarities. Health inequality had to compete against a preoccupation with improving access to acute services generally and balancing budgets over the short term. There was a bias in the interventions described towards targeting health behaviours, but with limited use of evidence about efficacy, and indications that measuring progress with reducing health inequalities was starting to lead to an emphasis on 'quick wins' from pharmacological interventions.

KW - care

KW - policy

KW - performance

KW - English

U2 - 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2009.01782.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2009.01782.x

M3 - Article

VL - 87

SP - 762

EP - 778

JO - Public Administration

JF - Public Administration

SN - 0033-3298

IS - 4

ER -