Team communication during patient handover from the operating room

more than facts and figures

Tanja Manser, Simon Foster, Rhona Flin, Rona Patey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

49 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: This study was aimed at examining team communication during postoperative handover and its relationship to clinicians’ self-ratings of handover quality.
Background: Adverse events can often be traced back to inadequate communication during patient handover. Research and improvement efforts have mostly focused on the information transfer function of patient handover. However, the specific mechanisms between handover communication processes among teams of transferring and receiving clinicians and handover quality are poorly understood.
Method: We conducted a prospective, cross-sectional observation study using a taxonomy for handover behaviors developed on the basis of established approaches for analyzing teamwork in health care. Immediately after the observation, transferring and receiving clinicians rated the quality of the handover using a structured tool for handover quality assessment. Handover communication during 117 handovers in three postoperative settings and its relationship to clinicians’ self-ratings of handover quality were analyzed with the use of correlation analyses and analyses of variance.
Results: We identified significantly different patterns of handover communication between clinical settings and across handover roles. Assessments provided during handover were related to higher ratings of handover quality overall and to all four dimensions of handover quality identified in this study. If assessment was lacking, we observed compensatory information seeking by the receiving team.
Conclusion: Handover quality is more than the correct, complete transmission of patient information. Assessments, including predictions or anticipated problems, are critical to the quality of postoperative handover.
Application: The identification of communication behaviors related to high-quality handovers is necessary to effectively support the design and evaluation of handover improvement efforts.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)138-156
Number of pages19
JournalHuman Factors
Volume55
Issue number1
Early online date5 Jul 2012
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2013

Fingerprint

Patient Handoff
Operating rooms
Operating Rooms
Communication
communication
Observation
rating
Taxonomies
Health care
Transfer functions
Analysis of Variance
Cross-Sectional Studies
communication behavior
Delivery of Health Care
teamwork
taxonomy

Keywords

  • communication process
  • handover
  • observation study
  • team cognition
  • teamwork
  • patient safety
  • operating room
  • recovery room
  • anesthesia

Cite this

Team communication during patient handover from the operating room : more than facts and figures. / Manser, Tanja; Foster, Simon; Flin, Rhona; Patey, Rona.

In: Human Factors, Vol. 55, No. 1, 02.2013, p. 138-156.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5dbe4c28c50e4d308de68a1ceb712b3c,
title = "Team communication during patient handover from the operating room: more than facts and figures",
abstract = "Objective: This study was aimed at examining team communication during postoperative handover and its relationship to clinicians’ self-ratings of handover quality.Background: Adverse events can often be traced back to inadequate communication during patient handover. Research and improvement efforts have mostly focused on the information transfer function of patient handover. However, the specific mechanisms between handover communication processes among teams of transferring and receiving clinicians and handover quality are poorly understood.Method: We conducted a prospective, cross-sectional observation study using a taxonomy for handover behaviors developed on the basis of established approaches for analyzing teamwork in health care. Immediately after the observation, transferring and receiving clinicians rated the quality of the handover using a structured tool for handover quality assessment. Handover communication during 117 handovers in three postoperative settings and its relationship to clinicians’ self-ratings of handover quality were analyzed with the use of correlation analyses and analyses of variance.Results: We identified significantly different patterns of handover communication between clinical settings and across handover roles. Assessments provided during handover were related to higher ratings of handover quality overall and to all four dimensions of handover quality identified in this study. If assessment was lacking, we observed compensatory information seeking by the receiving team.Conclusion: Handover quality is more than the correct, complete transmission of patient information. Assessments, including predictions or anticipated problems, are critical to the quality of postoperative handover.Application: The identification of communication behaviors related to high-quality handovers is necessary to effectively support the design and evaluation of handover improvement efforts.",
keywords = "communication process, handover, observation study, team cognition, teamwork, patient safety, operating room, recovery room, anesthesia",
author = "Tanja Manser and Simon Foster and Rhona Flin and Rona Patey",
year = "2013",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1177/0018720812451594",
language = "English",
volume = "55",
pages = "138--156",
journal = "Human Factors",
issn = "0018-7208",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Team communication during patient handover from the operating room

T2 - more than facts and figures

AU - Manser, Tanja

AU - Foster, Simon

AU - Flin, Rhona

AU - Patey, Rona

PY - 2013/2

Y1 - 2013/2

N2 - Objective: This study was aimed at examining team communication during postoperative handover and its relationship to clinicians’ self-ratings of handover quality.Background: Adverse events can often be traced back to inadequate communication during patient handover. Research and improvement efforts have mostly focused on the information transfer function of patient handover. However, the specific mechanisms between handover communication processes among teams of transferring and receiving clinicians and handover quality are poorly understood.Method: We conducted a prospective, cross-sectional observation study using a taxonomy for handover behaviors developed on the basis of established approaches for analyzing teamwork in health care. Immediately after the observation, transferring and receiving clinicians rated the quality of the handover using a structured tool for handover quality assessment. Handover communication during 117 handovers in three postoperative settings and its relationship to clinicians’ self-ratings of handover quality were analyzed with the use of correlation analyses and analyses of variance.Results: We identified significantly different patterns of handover communication between clinical settings and across handover roles. Assessments provided during handover were related to higher ratings of handover quality overall and to all four dimensions of handover quality identified in this study. If assessment was lacking, we observed compensatory information seeking by the receiving team.Conclusion: Handover quality is more than the correct, complete transmission of patient information. Assessments, including predictions or anticipated problems, are critical to the quality of postoperative handover.Application: The identification of communication behaviors related to high-quality handovers is necessary to effectively support the design and evaluation of handover improvement efforts.

AB - Objective: This study was aimed at examining team communication during postoperative handover and its relationship to clinicians’ self-ratings of handover quality.Background: Adverse events can often be traced back to inadequate communication during patient handover. Research and improvement efforts have mostly focused on the information transfer function of patient handover. However, the specific mechanisms between handover communication processes among teams of transferring and receiving clinicians and handover quality are poorly understood.Method: We conducted a prospective, cross-sectional observation study using a taxonomy for handover behaviors developed on the basis of established approaches for analyzing teamwork in health care. Immediately after the observation, transferring and receiving clinicians rated the quality of the handover using a structured tool for handover quality assessment. Handover communication during 117 handovers in three postoperative settings and its relationship to clinicians’ self-ratings of handover quality were analyzed with the use of correlation analyses and analyses of variance.Results: We identified significantly different patterns of handover communication between clinical settings and across handover roles. Assessments provided during handover were related to higher ratings of handover quality overall and to all four dimensions of handover quality identified in this study. If assessment was lacking, we observed compensatory information seeking by the receiving team.Conclusion: Handover quality is more than the correct, complete transmission of patient information. Assessments, including predictions or anticipated problems, are critical to the quality of postoperative handover.Application: The identification of communication behaviors related to high-quality handovers is necessary to effectively support the design and evaluation of handover improvement efforts.

KW - communication process

KW - handover

KW - observation study

KW - team cognition

KW - teamwork

KW - patient safety

KW - operating room

KW - recovery room

KW - anesthesia

U2 - 10.1177/0018720812451594

DO - 10.1177/0018720812451594

M3 - Article

VL - 55

SP - 138

EP - 156

JO - Human Factors

JF - Human Factors

SN - 0018-7208

IS - 1

ER -