Temporal stability of beliefs about medicines

implications for optimising adherence

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

22 Citations (Scopus)
4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Objective: To compare beliefs about medicines, as measured by the BMQ-General questionnaire, at two time points for the same respondents.

Methods: Respondents completed the BMQ-General as part of two separate postal questionnaires, administered with an intervening period of almost 4 years. BMQ-General scores were compared for all respondents at the two time points (2002 and 2005). Scores were also compared for three mutually exclusive groups based on changes in self-reported health status (better, worse or no change) during the intervening period.

Results: BMQ-General scores remained stable over time: no statistically significant differences were observed in individuals' scores after almost 4 years. This finding persisted amongst respondents who reported changes in health status during the intervening period.

Conclusion: General beliefs about medicines appear to remain stable over time, irrespective of changes in health status. Further research should be done to establish whether specific beliefs about medicines prescribed for individuals are similarly stable.

Practice implications: Adherence is known to be associated with beliefs about medicines. The observed stability in such beliefs could have implications for the design of interventions to improve adherence to prescribed medication regimes. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)225-230
Number of pages6
JournalPatient Education and Counseling
Volume79
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2010

Keywords

  • Adherence
  • Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire
  • Health beliefs
  • behavior-change techniques
  • self-reported adherence
  • medication adherence
  • illness
  • Scotland
  • advice

Cite this

Temporal stability of beliefs about medicines : implications for optimising adherence. / Porteous, Terry; Francis, Jill; Bond, Christine; Hannaford, Phil.

In: Patient Education and Counseling, Vol. 79, No. 2, 05.2010, p. 225-230.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c76402aa5a354653bf235c2bd926dfa2,
title = "Temporal stability of beliefs about medicines: implications for optimising adherence",
abstract = "Objective: To compare beliefs about medicines, as measured by the BMQ-General questionnaire, at two time points for the same respondents.Methods: Respondents completed the BMQ-General as part of two separate postal questionnaires, administered with an intervening period of almost 4 years. BMQ-General scores were compared for all respondents at the two time points (2002 and 2005). Scores were also compared for three mutually exclusive groups based on changes in self-reported health status (better, worse or no change) during the intervening period.Results: BMQ-General scores remained stable over time: no statistically significant differences were observed in individuals' scores after almost 4 years. This finding persisted amongst respondents who reported changes in health status during the intervening period.Conclusion: General beliefs about medicines appear to remain stable over time, irrespective of changes in health status. Further research should be done to establish whether specific beliefs about medicines prescribed for individuals are similarly stable.Practice implications: Adherence is known to be associated with beliefs about medicines. The observed stability in such beliefs could have implications for the design of interventions to improve adherence to prescribed medication regimes. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.",
keywords = "Adherence, Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire, Health beliefs, behavior-change techniques, self-reported adherence, medication adherence, illness, Scotland, advice",
author = "Terry Porteous and Jill Francis and Christine Bond and Phil Hannaford",
year = "2010",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1016/j.pec.2009.07.037",
language = "English",
volume = "79",
pages = "225--230",
journal = "Patient Education and Counseling",
issn = "0738-3991",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Temporal stability of beliefs about medicines

T2 - implications for optimising adherence

AU - Porteous, Terry

AU - Francis, Jill

AU - Bond, Christine

AU - Hannaford, Phil

PY - 2010/5

Y1 - 2010/5

N2 - Objective: To compare beliefs about medicines, as measured by the BMQ-General questionnaire, at two time points for the same respondents.Methods: Respondents completed the BMQ-General as part of two separate postal questionnaires, administered with an intervening period of almost 4 years. BMQ-General scores were compared for all respondents at the two time points (2002 and 2005). Scores were also compared for three mutually exclusive groups based on changes in self-reported health status (better, worse or no change) during the intervening period.Results: BMQ-General scores remained stable over time: no statistically significant differences were observed in individuals' scores after almost 4 years. This finding persisted amongst respondents who reported changes in health status during the intervening period.Conclusion: General beliefs about medicines appear to remain stable over time, irrespective of changes in health status. Further research should be done to establish whether specific beliefs about medicines prescribed for individuals are similarly stable.Practice implications: Adherence is known to be associated with beliefs about medicines. The observed stability in such beliefs could have implications for the design of interventions to improve adherence to prescribed medication regimes. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

AB - Objective: To compare beliefs about medicines, as measured by the BMQ-General questionnaire, at two time points for the same respondents.Methods: Respondents completed the BMQ-General as part of two separate postal questionnaires, administered with an intervening period of almost 4 years. BMQ-General scores were compared for all respondents at the two time points (2002 and 2005). Scores were also compared for three mutually exclusive groups based on changes in self-reported health status (better, worse or no change) during the intervening period.Results: BMQ-General scores remained stable over time: no statistically significant differences were observed in individuals' scores after almost 4 years. This finding persisted amongst respondents who reported changes in health status during the intervening period.Conclusion: General beliefs about medicines appear to remain stable over time, irrespective of changes in health status. Further research should be done to establish whether specific beliefs about medicines prescribed for individuals are similarly stable.Practice implications: Adherence is known to be associated with beliefs about medicines. The observed stability in such beliefs could have implications for the design of interventions to improve adherence to prescribed medication regimes. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

KW - Adherence

KW - Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire

KW - Health beliefs

KW - behavior-change techniques

KW - self-reported adherence

KW - medication adherence

KW - illness

KW - Scotland

KW - advice

U2 - 10.1016/j.pec.2009.07.037

DO - 10.1016/j.pec.2009.07.037

M3 - Article

VL - 79

SP - 225

EP - 230

JO - Patient Education and Counseling

JF - Patient Education and Counseling

SN - 0738-3991

IS - 2

ER -