Testing an integrated behavioural and biomedical model of disability in N-of-1 studies with chronic pain

Francis Quinn*, Marie Johnston, Derek W. Johnston

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Previous research has supported an integrated biomedical and behavioural model explaining activity limitations. However, further tests of this model are required at the within-person level, because while it proposes that the constructs are related within individuals, it has primarily been tested between individuals in large group studies. We aimed to test the integrated model at the within-person level.

Method: Six correlational N-of-1 studies in participants with arthritis, chronic pain and walking limitations were carried out. Daily measures of theoretical constructs were collected using a hand-held computer (PDA), the activity was assessed by self-report and accelerometer and the data were analysed using time-series analysis.

Results: The biomedical model was not supported as pain impairment did not predict activity, so the integrated model was supported partially. Impairment predicted intention to move around, while perceived behavioural control (PBC) and intention predicted activity. PBC did not predict activity limitation in the expected direction.

Conclusions: The integrated model of disability was partially supported within individuals, especially the behavioural elements. However, results suggest that different elements of the model may drive activity (limitations) for different individuals. The integrated model provides a useful framework for understanding disability and suggests interventions, and the utility of N-of-1 methodology for testing theory is illustrated.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1391-1406
Number of pages16
JournalPsychology & Health
Volume28
Issue number12
Early online date18 Jul 2013
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2013

Fingerprint

Chronic Pain
Handheld Computers
Self Report
Walking
Arthritis
Hand
Pain
Research
Direction compound
Drive

Keywords

  • disability
  • ICF
  • theory of planned behaviour
  • chronic pain
  • N-of-1
  • single-case
  • planned behavior
  • self-efficacy
  • activity limitations
  • perceived control
  • predict

Cite this

Testing an integrated behavioural and biomedical model of disability in N-of-1 studies with chronic pain. / Quinn, Francis; Johnston, Marie; Johnston, Derek W.

In: Psychology & Health, Vol. 28, No. 12, 01.12.2013, p. 1391-1406.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{47ba4d8cf1aa46079aebdbad951e2131,
title = "Testing an integrated behavioural and biomedical model of disability in N-of-1 studies with chronic pain",
abstract = "Background: Previous research has supported an integrated biomedical and behavioural model explaining activity limitations. However, further tests of this model are required at the within-person level, because while it proposes that the constructs are related within individuals, it has primarily been tested between individuals in large group studies. We aimed to test the integrated model at the within-person level.Method: Six correlational N-of-1 studies in participants with arthritis, chronic pain and walking limitations were carried out. Daily measures of theoretical constructs were collected using a hand-held computer (PDA), the activity was assessed by self-report and accelerometer and the data were analysed using time-series analysis.Results: The biomedical model was not supported as pain impairment did not predict activity, so the integrated model was supported partially. Impairment predicted intention to move around, while perceived behavioural control (PBC) and intention predicted activity. PBC did not predict activity limitation in the expected direction.Conclusions: The integrated model of disability was partially supported within individuals, especially the behavioural elements. However, results suggest that different elements of the model may drive activity (limitations) for different individuals. The integrated model provides a useful framework for understanding disability and suggests interventions, and the utility of N-of-1 methodology for testing theory is illustrated.",
keywords = "disability, ICF, theory of planned behaviour, chronic pain, N-of-1, single-case, planned behavior, self-efficacy, activity limitations, perceived control, predict",
author = "Francis Quinn and Marie Johnston and Johnston, {Derek W.}",
year = "2013",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/08870446.2013.814773",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "1391--1406",
journal = "Psychology & Health",
issn = "0887-0446",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Testing an integrated behavioural and biomedical model of disability in N-of-1 studies with chronic pain

AU - Quinn, Francis

AU - Johnston, Marie

AU - Johnston, Derek W.

PY - 2013/12/1

Y1 - 2013/12/1

N2 - Background: Previous research has supported an integrated biomedical and behavioural model explaining activity limitations. However, further tests of this model are required at the within-person level, because while it proposes that the constructs are related within individuals, it has primarily been tested between individuals in large group studies. We aimed to test the integrated model at the within-person level.Method: Six correlational N-of-1 studies in participants with arthritis, chronic pain and walking limitations were carried out. Daily measures of theoretical constructs were collected using a hand-held computer (PDA), the activity was assessed by self-report and accelerometer and the data were analysed using time-series analysis.Results: The biomedical model was not supported as pain impairment did not predict activity, so the integrated model was supported partially. Impairment predicted intention to move around, while perceived behavioural control (PBC) and intention predicted activity. PBC did not predict activity limitation in the expected direction.Conclusions: The integrated model of disability was partially supported within individuals, especially the behavioural elements. However, results suggest that different elements of the model may drive activity (limitations) for different individuals. The integrated model provides a useful framework for understanding disability and suggests interventions, and the utility of N-of-1 methodology for testing theory is illustrated.

AB - Background: Previous research has supported an integrated biomedical and behavioural model explaining activity limitations. However, further tests of this model are required at the within-person level, because while it proposes that the constructs are related within individuals, it has primarily been tested between individuals in large group studies. We aimed to test the integrated model at the within-person level.Method: Six correlational N-of-1 studies in participants with arthritis, chronic pain and walking limitations were carried out. Daily measures of theoretical constructs were collected using a hand-held computer (PDA), the activity was assessed by self-report and accelerometer and the data were analysed using time-series analysis.Results: The biomedical model was not supported as pain impairment did not predict activity, so the integrated model was supported partially. Impairment predicted intention to move around, while perceived behavioural control (PBC) and intention predicted activity. PBC did not predict activity limitation in the expected direction.Conclusions: The integrated model of disability was partially supported within individuals, especially the behavioural elements. However, results suggest that different elements of the model may drive activity (limitations) for different individuals. The integrated model provides a useful framework for understanding disability and suggests interventions, and the utility of N-of-1 methodology for testing theory is illustrated.

KW - disability

KW - ICF

KW - theory of planned behaviour

KW - chronic pain

KW - N-of-1

KW - single-case

KW - planned behavior

KW - self-efficacy

KW - activity limitations

KW - perceived control

KW - predict

U2 - 10.1080/08870446.2013.814773

DO - 10.1080/08870446.2013.814773

M3 - Article

VL - 28

SP - 1391

EP - 1406

JO - Psychology & Health

JF - Psychology & Health

SN - 0887-0446

IS - 12

ER -