Testing for differences in multiple quality of life dimensions

Generating hypotheses from the experience of hospital staff

M. Groenvold*, P. M. Fayers

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In clinical trials with a quality of life (QoL) component, it is usual to monitor several QoL dimensions at several points in time. Multiple significance tests without formal hypotheses are problematic. It is not always feasible to specify a priori hypotheses for all variables. Can such studies be used to generate hypotheses for testing in later research only? We developed a method which can allow for formal hypothesis testing on a data set collected without a priori hypotheses in the protocol. We surveyed experienced physicians and nurses treating patients, to obtain independent expectations about differences in QoL dimensions. These 'staff expectations' will be used in the analysis of QoL data collected from breast cancer patients taking part in three randomized trials of adjuvant therapy. We propose frameworks for the informal and formal use of the experience of the staff in testing for group differences in patients' QoL scores. The method described here is anticipated to be useful for QoL studies in general, even when a priori hypotheses were specified before the studies were initiated.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)479-486
Number of pages8
JournalQuality of Life Research
Volume7
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 1998

Fingerprint

Quality of Life
Nurses
Clinical Trials
Breast Neoplasms
Physicians
Research
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Data interpretation
  • Health status indicators
  • Quality of life
  • Randomized controlled trials
  • Significance testing
  • Statistical

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Testing for differences in multiple quality of life dimensions : Generating hypotheses from the experience of hospital staff. / Groenvold, M.; Fayers, P. M.

In: Quality of Life Research, Vol. 7, No. 6, 08.1998, p. 479-486.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c82e0dbe56ff440c8b0ce1b08b6f3879,
title = "Testing for differences in multiple quality of life dimensions: Generating hypotheses from the experience of hospital staff",
abstract = "In clinical trials with a quality of life (QoL) component, it is usual to monitor several QoL dimensions at several points in time. Multiple significance tests without formal hypotheses are problematic. It is not always feasible to specify a priori hypotheses for all variables. Can such studies be used to generate hypotheses for testing in later research only? We developed a method which can allow for formal hypothesis testing on a data set collected without a priori hypotheses in the protocol. We surveyed experienced physicians and nurses treating patients, to obtain independent expectations about differences in QoL dimensions. These 'staff expectations' will be used in the analysis of QoL data collected from breast cancer patients taking part in three randomized trials of adjuvant therapy. We propose frameworks for the informal and formal use of the experience of the staff in testing for group differences in patients' QoL scores. The method described here is anticipated to be useful for QoL studies in general, even when a priori hypotheses were specified before the studies were initiated.",
keywords = "Data interpretation, Health status indicators, Quality of life, Randomized controlled trials, Significance testing, Statistical",
author = "M. Groenvold and Fayers, {P. M.}",
note = "Acknowledgement This work was supported by grants from the Danish Cancer Society.",
year = "1998",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1023/A:1008818206511",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "479--486",
journal = "Quality of Life Research",
issn = "0962-9343",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Testing for differences in multiple quality of life dimensions

T2 - Generating hypotheses from the experience of hospital staff

AU - Groenvold, M.

AU - Fayers, P. M.

N1 - Acknowledgement This work was supported by grants from the Danish Cancer Society.

PY - 1998/8

Y1 - 1998/8

N2 - In clinical trials with a quality of life (QoL) component, it is usual to monitor several QoL dimensions at several points in time. Multiple significance tests without formal hypotheses are problematic. It is not always feasible to specify a priori hypotheses for all variables. Can such studies be used to generate hypotheses for testing in later research only? We developed a method which can allow for formal hypothesis testing on a data set collected without a priori hypotheses in the protocol. We surveyed experienced physicians and nurses treating patients, to obtain independent expectations about differences in QoL dimensions. These 'staff expectations' will be used in the analysis of QoL data collected from breast cancer patients taking part in three randomized trials of adjuvant therapy. We propose frameworks for the informal and formal use of the experience of the staff in testing for group differences in patients' QoL scores. The method described here is anticipated to be useful for QoL studies in general, even when a priori hypotheses were specified before the studies were initiated.

AB - In clinical trials with a quality of life (QoL) component, it is usual to monitor several QoL dimensions at several points in time. Multiple significance tests without formal hypotheses are problematic. It is not always feasible to specify a priori hypotheses for all variables. Can such studies be used to generate hypotheses for testing in later research only? We developed a method which can allow for formal hypothesis testing on a data set collected without a priori hypotheses in the protocol. We surveyed experienced physicians and nurses treating patients, to obtain independent expectations about differences in QoL dimensions. These 'staff expectations' will be used in the analysis of QoL data collected from breast cancer patients taking part in three randomized trials of adjuvant therapy. We propose frameworks for the informal and formal use of the experience of the staff in testing for group differences in patients' QoL scores. The method described here is anticipated to be useful for QoL studies in general, even when a priori hypotheses were specified before the studies were initiated.

KW - Data interpretation

KW - Health status indicators

KW - Quality of life

KW - Randomized controlled trials

KW - Significance testing

KW - Statistical

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031694647&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1023/A:1008818206511

DO - 10.1023/A:1008818206511

M3 - Article

VL - 7

SP - 479

EP - 486

JO - Quality of Life Research

JF - Quality of Life Research

SN - 0962-9343

IS - 6

ER -