Testing integrated behavioural and biomedical models of activity and activity limitations in a population-based sample

Diane Dixon, Marie Johnston, Alison Elliott, Phil Hannaford

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: The predictive utility of an integrated model of disability is tested. The integrated model incorporates an impairment based model (International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF)) and the behavioural models. Methods: Community dwelling adults (n = 628) completed a postal questionnaire measuring the integrated model. The ability of the model to predict disability in the form of activity limitations (ALs) and walking, in the full community sample and in respondents reporting chronic pain was tested. Results: In both the community and chronic pain samples each version of the integrated model explained a majority (55%–67%) of the variance in ALs but only 11%–29% of the variance in walking behaviour (WB). Impairment directly predicted ALs but did not directly predict WB. Control related cognitions were direct predictors, and mediators, of the relationship between bodily impairment and both ALs and WB. In addition, intentions and outcome expectancies predicted WB. Self-efficacy (SE) was the most consistent predictor of both ALs and WB. Conclusions: An integrated model which combines psychological constructs and impairment is required for an adequate understanding of ALs. By contrast, behavioural models, but not degree of impairment, are necessary to explain activity levels.

Implications for Rehabilitation
Activity limitations are typically predicted by impairment based models, whereas activity is typically predicted by cognition based models of behaviour.

This study examines whether a theoretical model that incorporated both cognition and impairment factors could predict the activity of walking and activity limitations in a community sample of people with and without chronic pain.

An adequate understanding of activity limitations required a model that incorporated impairment and cognitions, whereas impairment factors were not required for an understanding of walking behaviour.

Interventions to reduce or manage activity limitations might usefully incorporate techniques to change cognitions, especially self-efficacy perceptions.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1157-1166
Number of pages10
JournalDisability & Rehabilitation
Volume34
Issue number14
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2012

Fingerprint

Walking
Cognition
Population
Chronic Pain
Self Efficacy
International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health
Independent Living
Aptitude
Theoretical Models
Psychology

Keywords

  • chronic pain
  • disability
  • ICF
  • social cognitive theory
  • theory of planned behaviour
  • walking

Cite this

Testing integrated behavioural and biomedical models of activity and activity limitations in a population-based sample. / Dixon, Diane; Johnston, Marie; Elliott, Alison; Hannaford, Phil.

In: Disability & Rehabilitation, Vol. 34, No. 14, 07.2012, p. 1157-1166.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ebe3f762517e4932af38ac90ee456ea5,
title = "Testing integrated behavioural and biomedical models of activity and activity limitations in a population-based sample",
abstract = "Purpose: The predictive utility of an integrated model of disability is tested. The integrated model incorporates an impairment based model (International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF)) and the behavioural models. Methods: Community dwelling adults (n = 628) completed a postal questionnaire measuring the integrated model. The ability of the model to predict disability in the form of activity limitations (ALs) and walking, in the full community sample and in respondents reporting chronic pain was tested. Results: In both the community and chronic pain samples each version of the integrated model explained a majority (55{\%}–67{\%}) of the variance in ALs but only 11{\%}–29{\%} of the variance in walking behaviour (WB). Impairment directly predicted ALs but did not directly predict WB. Control related cognitions were direct predictors, and mediators, of the relationship between bodily impairment and both ALs and WB. In addition, intentions and outcome expectancies predicted WB. Self-efficacy (SE) was the most consistent predictor of both ALs and WB. Conclusions: An integrated model which combines psychological constructs and impairment is required for an adequate understanding of ALs. By contrast, behavioural models, but not degree of impairment, are necessary to explain activity levels.Implications for RehabilitationActivity limitations are typically predicted by impairment based models, whereas activity is typically predicted by cognition based models of behaviour.This study examines whether a theoretical model that incorporated both cognition and impairment factors could predict the activity of walking and activity limitations in a community sample of people with and without chronic pain.An adequate understanding of activity limitations required a model that incorporated impairment and cognitions, whereas impairment factors were not required for an understanding of walking behaviour.Interventions to reduce or manage activity limitations might usefully incorporate techniques to change cognitions, especially self-efficacy perceptions.",
keywords = "chronic pain, disability, ICF, social cognitive theory, theory of planned behaviour, walking",
author = "Diane Dixon and Marie Johnston and Alison Elliott and Phil Hannaford",
year = "2012",
month = "7",
doi = "10.3109/09638288.2011.635749",
language = "English",
volume = "34",
pages = "1157--1166",
journal = "Disability & Rehabilitation",
issn = "0963-8288",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",
number = "14",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Testing integrated behavioural and biomedical models of activity and activity limitations in a population-based sample

AU - Dixon, Diane

AU - Johnston, Marie

AU - Elliott, Alison

AU - Hannaford, Phil

PY - 2012/7

Y1 - 2012/7

N2 - Purpose: The predictive utility of an integrated model of disability is tested. The integrated model incorporates an impairment based model (International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF)) and the behavioural models. Methods: Community dwelling adults (n = 628) completed a postal questionnaire measuring the integrated model. The ability of the model to predict disability in the form of activity limitations (ALs) and walking, in the full community sample and in respondents reporting chronic pain was tested. Results: In both the community and chronic pain samples each version of the integrated model explained a majority (55%–67%) of the variance in ALs but only 11%–29% of the variance in walking behaviour (WB). Impairment directly predicted ALs but did not directly predict WB. Control related cognitions were direct predictors, and mediators, of the relationship between bodily impairment and both ALs and WB. In addition, intentions and outcome expectancies predicted WB. Self-efficacy (SE) was the most consistent predictor of both ALs and WB. Conclusions: An integrated model which combines psychological constructs and impairment is required for an adequate understanding of ALs. By contrast, behavioural models, but not degree of impairment, are necessary to explain activity levels.Implications for RehabilitationActivity limitations are typically predicted by impairment based models, whereas activity is typically predicted by cognition based models of behaviour.This study examines whether a theoretical model that incorporated both cognition and impairment factors could predict the activity of walking and activity limitations in a community sample of people with and without chronic pain.An adequate understanding of activity limitations required a model that incorporated impairment and cognitions, whereas impairment factors were not required for an understanding of walking behaviour.Interventions to reduce or manage activity limitations might usefully incorporate techniques to change cognitions, especially self-efficacy perceptions.

AB - Purpose: The predictive utility of an integrated model of disability is tested. The integrated model incorporates an impairment based model (International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF)) and the behavioural models. Methods: Community dwelling adults (n = 628) completed a postal questionnaire measuring the integrated model. The ability of the model to predict disability in the form of activity limitations (ALs) and walking, in the full community sample and in respondents reporting chronic pain was tested. Results: In both the community and chronic pain samples each version of the integrated model explained a majority (55%–67%) of the variance in ALs but only 11%–29% of the variance in walking behaviour (WB). Impairment directly predicted ALs but did not directly predict WB. Control related cognitions were direct predictors, and mediators, of the relationship between bodily impairment and both ALs and WB. In addition, intentions and outcome expectancies predicted WB. Self-efficacy (SE) was the most consistent predictor of both ALs and WB. Conclusions: An integrated model which combines psychological constructs and impairment is required for an adequate understanding of ALs. By contrast, behavioural models, but not degree of impairment, are necessary to explain activity levels.Implications for RehabilitationActivity limitations are typically predicted by impairment based models, whereas activity is typically predicted by cognition based models of behaviour.This study examines whether a theoretical model that incorporated both cognition and impairment factors could predict the activity of walking and activity limitations in a community sample of people with and without chronic pain.An adequate understanding of activity limitations required a model that incorporated impairment and cognitions, whereas impairment factors were not required for an understanding of walking behaviour.Interventions to reduce or manage activity limitations might usefully incorporate techniques to change cognitions, especially self-efficacy perceptions.

KW - chronic pain

KW - disability

KW - ICF

KW - social cognitive theory

KW - theory of planned behaviour

KW - walking

U2 - 10.3109/09638288.2011.635749

DO - 10.3109/09638288.2011.635749

M3 - Article

VL - 34

SP - 1157

EP - 1166

JO - Disability & Rehabilitation

JF - Disability & Rehabilitation

SN - 0963-8288

IS - 14

ER -