Testing the adequacy of measured data for evaluating nitrogen turnover models by the dot-to-dot method

Joanne Ursula Smith, Peter Smith, G. M. Richter, F. A. Agostini, S. J. Welham

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Dynamic models of nitrogen turnover in soil are being used increasingly in agricultural science. To be of value, a model must be thoroughly evaluated, and the expected accuracy of simulated values must be defined. Frequent field measurements are time-consuming and costly, and so models are often evaluated against only few data. However, this mismatch between the measured and simulated values can result in error statistics that are themselves subject to large errors and therefore unreliable. The dot-to-dot method quantifies the error associated with having too few measured values by interpolating linearly between measured data (hence, dot-to-dot) and evaluating the simulation at each time step using interpolated data where actual measurements are unavailable. A large error will be seen if the measured data do not capture the fluctuations predicted by the model. Other quantitative methods can be used to evaluate the performance of a model, but the dot-to-dot method can be used in conjunction with these to estimate whether or not the data are adequate for testing the model. If the performance of the model at the measured points is within the acceptable error, then the dot-to-dot method is used to judge whether there are too few points to evaluate the model's performance, and so to determine whether the evaluation of the model is valid.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)175-185
Number of pages10
JournalEuropean Journal of Soil Science
Volume54
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2003

Keywords

  • COMPUTER-SIMULATION
  • SOIL
  • WINTER
  • CROP

Cite this

Testing the adequacy of measured data for evaluating nitrogen turnover models by the dot-to-dot method. / Smith, Joanne Ursula; Smith, Peter; Richter, G. M.; Agostini, F. A.; Welham, S. J.

In: European Journal of Soil Science, Vol. 54, No. 1, 2003, p. 175-185.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{25656954c7e54bb7bd83c65a5cda3eaf,
title = "Testing the adequacy of measured data for evaluating nitrogen turnover models by the dot-to-dot method",
abstract = "Dynamic models of nitrogen turnover in soil are being used increasingly in agricultural science. To be of value, a model must be thoroughly evaluated, and the expected accuracy of simulated values must be defined. Frequent field measurements are time-consuming and costly, and so models are often evaluated against only few data. However, this mismatch between the measured and simulated values can result in error statistics that are themselves subject to large errors and therefore unreliable. The dot-to-dot method quantifies the error associated with having too few measured values by interpolating linearly between measured data (hence, dot-to-dot) and evaluating the simulation at each time step using interpolated data where actual measurements are unavailable. A large error will be seen if the measured data do not capture the fluctuations predicted by the model. Other quantitative methods can be used to evaluate the performance of a model, but the dot-to-dot method can be used in conjunction with these to estimate whether or not the data are adequate for testing the model. If the performance of the model at the measured points is within the acceptable error, then the dot-to-dot method is used to judge whether there are too few points to evaluate the model's performance, and so to determine whether the evaluation of the model is valid.",
keywords = "COMPUTER-SIMULATION, SOIL, WINTER, CROP",
author = "Smith, {Joanne Ursula} and Peter Smith and Richter, {G. M.} and Agostini, {F. A.} and Welham, {S. J.}",
year = "2003",
doi = "10.1046/j.1365-2389.2003.00501.x",
language = "English",
volume = "54",
pages = "175--185",
journal = "European Journal of Soil Science",
issn = "1351-0754",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Testing the adequacy of measured data for evaluating nitrogen turnover models by the dot-to-dot method

AU - Smith, Joanne Ursula

AU - Smith, Peter

AU - Richter, G. M.

AU - Agostini, F. A.

AU - Welham, S. J.

PY - 2003

Y1 - 2003

N2 - Dynamic models of nitrogen turnover in soil are being used increasingly in agricultural science. To be of value, a model must be thoroughly evaluated, and the expected accuracy of simulated values must be defined. Frequent field measurements are time-consuming and costly, and so models are often evaluated against only few data. However, this mismatch between the measured and simulated values can result in error statistics that are themselves subject to large errors and therefore unreliable. The dot-to-dot method quantifies the error associated with having too few measured values by interpolating linearly between measured data (hence, dot-to-dot) and evaluating the simulation at each time step using interpolated data where actual measurements are unavailable. A large error will be seen if the measured data do not capture the fluctuations predicted by the model. Other quantitative methods can be used to evaluate the performance of a model, but the dot-to-dot method can be used in conjunction with these to estimate whether or not the data are adequate for testing the model. If the performance of the model at the measured points is within the acceptable error, then the dot-to-dot method is used to judge whether there are too few points to evaluate the model's performance, and so to determine whether the evaluation of the model is valid.

AB - Dynamic models of nitrogen turnover in soil are being used increasingly in agricultural science. To be of value, a model must be thoroughly evaluated, and the expected accuracy of simulated values must be defined. Frequent field measurements are time-consuming and costly, and so models are often evaluated against only few data. However, this mismatch between the measured and simulated values can result in error statistics that are themselves subject to large errors and therefore unreliable. The dot-to-dot method quantifies the error associated with having too few measured values by interpolating linearly between measured data (hence, dot-to-dot) and evaluating the simulation at each time step using interpolated data where actual measurements are unavailable. A large error will be seen if the measured data do not capture the fluctuations predicted by the model. Other quantitative methods can be used to evaluate the performance of a model, but the dot-to-dot method can be used in conjunction with these to estimate whether or not the data are adequate for testing the model. If the performance of the model at the measured points is within the acceptable error, then the dot-to-dot method is used to judge whether there are too few points to evaluate the model's performance, and so to determine whether the evaluation of the model is valid.

KW - COMPUTER-SIMULATION

KW - SOIL

KW - WINTER

KW - CROP

U2 - 10.1046/j.1365-2389.2003.00501.x

DO - 10.1046/j.1365-2389.2003.00501.x

M3 - Article

VL - 54

SP - 175

EP - 185

JO - European Journal of Soil Science

JF - European Journal of Soil Science

SN - 1351-0754

IS - 1

ER -