Testing the functional basis of first impressions

Dimensions for children’s faces are not the same as for adults’ faces

Jemma R Collova (Corresponding Author), Clare Sutherland, Gillian Rhodes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Despite warnings not to “judge a book by its cover,” people rapidly form facial impressions. In Oosterhof and Todorov’s (2008) two-dimensional model of facial impressions, trustworthiness, and dominance underlie impressions and primarily function to signal the potential threat of others. Here, we test a key assumption of these models, namely that these dimensions are functional, by evaluating whether the adult-face dimensions apply to young children’s faces. Although it may be functional for adults to judge adult faces on dimensions that signal threat, adults associate different social goals with children, and these goals are likely to impact the impressions adults make of such faces. Thus, a functional approach would predict that the dimensions for children’s faces are not threat focused. In Studies 1 and 2, we build a data-driven model of Caucasian adults’ impressions of Caucasian children’s faces, finding evidence for two dimensions. The first dimension, niceness, is similar (although not identical) to the adult dimension of trustworthiness. However, we find a second dimension, shyness, that is clearly dissociable from dominance (Study 3), and critically, is not focused on threat. We demonstrate that adults are sensitive to subtle facial manipulations of these dimensions (Studies 4 and 5) and that these impressions impact adults’ behavioral expectations of children (Study 6). Finally, we show that niceness and shyness dimensions generalize to an independent sample of ambient images, demonstrating their robustness (Study 7). Our results suggest that social goals have the power to drive functional impressions and highlight the flexibility of our visual system when forming such inferences. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved)

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)900-924
Number of pages25
JournalJournal of Personality and Social Psychology
Volume117
Issue number5
Early online date6 Jun 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2019

Fingerprint

Shyness
threat
trustworthiness
Caucasian
manipulation
flexibility
evidence
Power (Psychology)
Drive

Keywords

  • Face perception
  • First impressions
  • Impression formation
  • Person perception
  • Social cognition
  • PERSON PERCEPTION
  • SOCIABILITY
  • social cognition
  • APPEARANCE
  • BEHAVIOR
  • person perception
  • impression formation
  • face perception
  • PHYSICAL ATTRACTIVENESS
  • first impressions
  • TO-HEIGHT RATIO
  • FACIAL-WIDTH
  • CHARACTER
  • JUDGMENTS
  • LIFE

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Testing the functional basis of first impressions : Dimensions for children’s faces are not the same as for adults’ faces. / Collova, Jemma R (Corresponding Author); Sutherland, Clare; Rhodes, Gillian.

In: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 117, No. 5, 11.2019, p. 900-924.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c82136b3364c4258ae56294f429d18ca,
title = "Testing the functional basis of first impressions: Dimensions for children’s faces are not the same as for adults’ faces",
abstract = "Despite warnings not to “judge a book by its cover,” people rapidly form facial impressions. In Oosterhof and Todorov’s (2008) two-dimensional model of facial impressions, trustworthiness, and dominance underlie impressions and primarily function to signal the potential threat of others. Here, we test a key assumption of these models, namely that these dimensions are functional, by evaluating whether the adult-face dimensions apply to young children’s faces. Although it may be functional for adults to judge adult faces on dimensions that signal threat, adults associate different social goals with children, and these goals are likely to impact the impressions adults make of such faces. Thus, a functional approach would predict that the dimensions for children’s faces are not threat focused. In Studies 1 and 2, we build a data-driven model of Caucasian adults’ impressions of Caucasian children’s faces, finding evidence for two dimensions. The first dimension, niceness, is similar (although not identical) to the adult dimension of trustworthiness. However, we find a second dimension, shyness, that is clearly dissociable from dominance (Study 3), and critically, is not focused on threat. We demonstrate that adults are sensitive to subtle facial manipulations of these dimensions (Studies 4 and 5) and that these impressions impact adults’ behavioral expectations of children (Study 6). Finally, we show that niceness and shyness dimensions generalize to an independent sample of ambient images, demonstrating their robustness (Study 7). Our results suggest that social goals have the power to drive functional impressions and highlight the flexibility of our visual system when forming such inferences. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved)",
keywords = "Face perception, First impressions, Impression formation, Person perception, Social cognition, PERSON PERCEPTION, SOCIABILITY, social cognition, APPEARANCE, BEHAVIOR, person perception, impression formation, face perception, PHYSICAL ATTRACTIVENESS, first impressions, TO-HEIGHT RATIO, FACIAL-WIDTH, CHARACTER, JUDGMENTS, LIFE",
author = "Collova, {Jemma R} and Clare Sutherland and Gillian Rhodes",
year = "2019",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1037/pspa0000167",
language = "English",
volume = "117",
pages = "900--924",
journal = "Journal of Personality and Social Psychology",
issn = "0022-3514",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Testing the functional basis of first impressions

T2 - Dimensions for children’s faces are not the same as for adults’ faces

AU - Collova, Jemma R

AU - Sutherland, Clare

AU - Rhodes, Gillian

PY - 2019/11

Y1 - 2019/11

N2 - Despite warnings not to “judge a book by its cover,” people rapidly form facial impressions. In Oosterhof and Todorov’s (2008) two-dimensional model of facial impressions, trustworthiness, and dominance underlie impressions and primarily function to signal the potential threat of others. Here, we test a key assumption of these models, namely that these dimensions are functional, by evaluating whether the adult-face dimensions apply to young children’s faces. Although it may be functional for adults to judge adult faces on dimensions that signal threat, adults associate different social goals with children, and these goals are likely to impact the impressions adults make of such faces. Thus, a functional approach would predict that the dimensions for children’s faces are not threat focused. In Studies 1 and 2, we build a data-driven model of Caucasian adults’ impressions of Caucasian children’s faces, finding evidence for two dimensions. The first dimension, niceness, is similar (although not identical) to the adult dimension of trustworthiness. However, we find a second dimension, shyness, that is clearly dissociable from dominance (Study 3), and critically, is not focused on threat. We demonstrate that adults are sensitive to subtle facial manipulations of these dimensions (Studies 4 and 5) and that these impressions impact adults’ behavioral expectations of children (Study 6). Finally, we show that niceness and shyness dimensions generalize to an independent sample of ambient images, demonstrating their robustness (Study 7). Our results suggest that social goals have the power to drive functional impressions and highlight the flexibility of our visual system when forming such inferences. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved)

AB - Despite warnings not to “judge a book by its cover,” people rapidly form facial impressions. In Oosterhof and Todorov’s (2008) two-dimensional model of facial impressions, trustworthiness, and dominance underlie impressions and primarily function to signal the potential threat of others. Here, we test a key assumption of these models, namely that these dimensions are functional, by evaluating whether the adult-face dimensions apply to young children’s faces. Although it may be functional for adults to judge adult faces on dimensions that signal threat, adults associate different social goals with children, and these goals are likely to impact the impressions adults make of such faces. Thus, a functional approach would predict that the dimensions for children’s faces are not threat focused. In Studies 1 and 2, we build a data-driven model of Caucasian adults’ impressions of Caucasian children’s faces, finding evidence for two dimensions. The first dimension, niceness, is similar (although not identical) to the adult dimension of trustworthiness. However, we find a second dimension, shyness, that is clearly dissociable from dominance (Study 3), and critically, is not focused on threat. We demonstrate that adults are sensitive to subtle facial manipulations of these dimensions (Studies 4 and 5) and that these impressions impact adults’ behavioral expectations of children (Study 6). Finally, we show that niceness and shyness dimensions generalize to an independent sample of ambient images, demonstrating their robustness (Study 7). Our results suggest that social goals have the power to drive functional impressions and highlight the flexibility of our visual system when forming such inferences. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved)

KW - Face perception

KW - First impressions

KW - Impression formation

KW - Person perception

KW - Social cognition

KW - PERSON PERCEPTION

KW - SOCIABILITY

KW - social cognition

KW - APPEARANCE

KW - BEHAVIOR

KW - person perception

KW - impression formation

KW - face perception

KW - PHYSICAL ATTRACTIVENESS

KW - first impressions

KW - TO-HEIGHT RATIO

KW - FACIAL-WIDTH

KW - CHARACTER

KW - JUDGMENTS

KW - LIFE

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85067029297&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/testing-functional-basis-first-impressions-dimensions-childrens-faces-not-same-adults-faces

UR - https://abdn.pure.elsevier.com/en/en/researchoutput/testing-the-functional-basis-of-first-impressions(c82136b3-364c-4258-ae56-294f429d18ca).html

U2 - 10.1037/pspa0000167

DO - 10.1037/pspa0000167

M3 - Article

VL - 117

SP - 900

EP - 924

JO - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

JF - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

SN - 0022-3514

IS - 5

ER -