Testing the predictions of energy allocation decisions in the evolution of life-history trade-offs

Amy L. Skibiel, John R. Speakman, Wendy R. Hood

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Allocating a greater amount of limited resources, such as energy, to current reproduction can reduce the amount of energy available for somatic maintenance and can ultimately impair future breeding success or maternal survival (i.e. cost of reproduction hypothesis). Although there is some support for the cost of reproduction hypothesis in birds, few empirical studies of mammals have demonstrated a trade-off between current and future reproduction. More importantly, most studies testing ultimate costs have neglected to confirm that the proximate costs of reproduction are high. 

We experimentally manipulated litter size in a wild population of Columbian ground squirrels for 2 years to examine both the proximate energetic and ultimate fitness (i.e. survival and breeding) costs of reproduction. We predicted that females raising augmented litters would have the highest rates of daily energy expenditure and as a result would experience lower survival rates or future fecundity.

Females raising augmented litters weaned more pups, had the highest litter masses at weaning, and had field metabolic rates that were almost 1·5 times greater than females raising control or reduced litters. Contrary to our prediction, there were no negative impacts of greater maternal investment and higher energy expenditure on the probability of maternal survival or future reproduction. 

Pups from augmented litters grew more slowly during the lactation period were smaller at weaning and had a lower probability of survival over-winter. Thus, although females were capable of raising more young than they gave birth to without short-term costs of reduced survival or fecundity, our observations suggest that limitations to litter size are not due to a trade-off in the allocation of energy, but rather due to the reduced survival of offspring from larger litters.

Examining the proximate mechanisms hypothesized to underlie life-history trade-offs can be challenging but is critical for a comprehensive understanding of the evolution of life histories.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1382-1391
Number of pages10
JournalFunctional Ecology
Volume27
Issue number6
Early online date25 Jun 2013
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2013

Fingerprint

litters (young animals)
life history
litter
prediction
energy
cost
testing
litter size
weaning
energy expenditure
pups
trade-off
expenditure
fecundity
lactation
breeding
squirrels
allocation
decision
wild population

Keywords

  • Cost of reproduction
  • Doubly-labelled water
  • Fecundity
  • Field metabolic rate
  • Litter size
  • Survival
  • Urocitellus columbianus

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Cite this

Testing the predictions of energy allocation decisions in the evolution of life-history trade-offs. / Skibiel, Amy L.; Speakman, John R.; Hood, Wendy R.

In: Functional Ecology, Vol. 27, No. 6, 12.2013, p. 1382-1391.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2de62b6a4877477580a9f73a18b39d06,
title = "Testing the predictions of energy allocation decisions in the evolution of life-history trade-offs",
abstract = "Allocating a greater amount of limited resources, such as energy, to current reproduction can reduce the amount of energy available for somatic maintenance and can ultimately impair future breeding success or maternal survival (i.e. cost of reproduction hypothesis). Although there is some support for the cost of reproduction hypothesis in birds, few empirical studies of mammals have demonstrated a trade-off between current and future reproduction. More importantly, most studies testing ultimate costs have neglected to confirm that the proximate costs of reproduction are high. We experimentally manipulated litter size in a wild population of Columbian ground squirrels for 2 years to examine both the proximate energetic and ultimate fitness (i.e. survival and breeding) costs of reproduction. We predicted that females raising augmented litters would have the highest rates of daily energy expenditure and as a result would experience lower survival rates or future fecundity.Females raising augmented litters weaned more pups, had the highest litter masses at weaning, and had field metabolic rates that were almost 1·5 times greater than females raising control or reduced litters. Contrary to our prediction, there were no negative impacts of greater maternal investment and higher energy expenditure on the probability of maternal survival or future reproduction. Pups from augmented litters grew more slowly during the lactation period were smaller at weaning and had a lower probability of survival over-winter. Thus, although females were capable of raising more young than they gave birth to without short-term costs of reduced survival or fecundity, our observations suggest that limitations to litter size are not due to a trade-off in the allocation of energy, but rather due to the reduced survival of offspring from larger litters.Examining the proximate mechanisms hypothesized to underlie life-history trade-offs can be challenging but is critical for a comprehensive understanding of the evolution of life histories.",
keywords = "Cost of reproduction, Doubly-labelled water, Fecundity, Field metabolic rate, Litter size, Survival, Urocitellus columbianus",
author = "Skibiel, {Amy L.} and Speakman, {John R.} and Hood, {Wendy R.}",
note = "We would like to thank the numerous field and laboratory assistants who have contributed to this project. Housing during field-work was provided by the University of Calgary Biogeoscience (BGS) Institute at the R. B.Miller Field Station, run by E. Johnson, K. Ruckstuhl and J. Buchanan-Mappin. We are grateful to Peter Thomson and Paula Redman for technical assistance with the isotope analysis. All research methods used in this study were approved by the Auburn University Institutional Animal Careand Use Committee, protocol number 2009-1151 and the University of Calgary Life and Environmental Sciences Animal Care Committee, proto-col BIO 9R-42. Funding was provided by an Auburn University Graduate Research Award, an American Society of Mammalogists Grant-in-Aid of Research and an NSF EPSCoR/AU-CMB summer fellowship awarded to A.L. Skibiel, by the Auburn University College of Science and Mathematics(W.R. Hood) and a National Science Foundation research grant to F.S.Dobson (DEB-0089473)",
year = "2013",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1111/1365-2435.12130",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "1382--1391",
journal = "Functional Ecology",
issn = "0269-8463",
publisher = "Blackwell Publishing Limited",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Testing the predictions of energy allocation decisions in the evolution of life-history trade-offs

AU - Skibiel, Amy L.

AU - Speakman, John R.

AU - Hood, Wendy R.

N1 - We would like to thank the numerous field and laboratory assistants who have contributed to this project. Housing during field-work was provided by the University of Calgary Biogeoscience (BGS) Institute at the R. B.Miller Field Station, run by E. Johnson, K. Ruckstuhl and J. Buchanan-Mappin. We are grateful to Peter Thomson and Paula Redman for technical assistance with the isotope analysis. All research methods used in this study were approved by the Auburn University Institutional Animal Careand Use Committee, protocol number 2009-1151 and the University of Calgary Life and Environmental Sciences Animal Care Committee, proto-col BIO 9R-42. Funding was provided by an Auburn University Graduate Research Award, an American Society of Mammalogists Grant-in-Aid of Research and an NSF EPSCoR/AU-CMB summer fellowship awarded to A.L. Skibiel, by the Auburn University College of Science and Mathematics(W.R. Hood) and a National Science Foundation research grant to F.S.Dobson (DEB-0089473)

PY - 2013/12

Y1 - 2013/12

N2 - Allocating a greater amount of limited resources, such as energy, to current reproduction can reduce the amount of energy available for somatic maintenance and can ultimately impair future breeding success or maternal survival (i.e. cost of reproduction hypothesis). Although there is some support for the cost of reproduction hypothesis in birds, few empirical studies of mammals have demonstrated a trade-off between current and future reproduction. More importantly, most studies testing ultimate costs have neglected to confirm that the proximate costs of reproduction are high. We experimentally manipulated litter size in a wild population of Columbian ground squirrels for 2 years to examine both the proximate energetic and ultimate fitness (i.e. survival and breeding) costs of reproduction. We predicted that females raising augmented litters would have the highest rates of daily energy expenditure and as a result would experience lower survival rates or future fecundity.Females raising augmented litters weaned more pups, had the highest litter masses at weaning, and had field metabolic rates that were almost 1·5 times greater than females raising control or reduced litters. Contrary to our prediction, there were no negative impacts of greater maternal investment and higher energy expenditure on the probability of maternal survival or future reproduction. Pups from augmented litters grew more slowly during the lactation period were smaller at weaning and had a lower probability of survival over-winter. Thus, although females were capable of raising more young than they gave birth to without short-term costs of reduced survival or fecundity, our observations suggest that limitations to litter size are not due to a trade-off in the allocation of energy, but rather due to the reduced survival of offspring from larger litters.Examining the proximate mechanisms hypothesized to underlie life-history trade-offs can be challenging but is critical for a comprehensive understanding of the evolution of life histories.

AB - Allocating a greater amount of limited resources, such as energy, to current reproduction can reduce the amount of energy available for somatic maintenance and can ultimately impair future breeding success or maternal survival (i.e. cost of reproduction hypothesis). Although there is some support for the cost of reproduction hypothesis in birds, few empirical studies of mammals have demonstrated a trade-off between current and future reproduction. More importantly, most studies testing ultimate costs have neglected to confirm that the proximate costs of reproduction are high. We experimentally manipulated litter size in a wild population of Columbian ground squirrels for 2 years to examine both the proximate energetic and ultimate fitness (i.e. survival and breeding) costs of reproduction. We predicted that females raising augmented litters would have the highest rates of daily energy expenditure and as a result would experience lower survival rates or future fecundity.Females raising augmented litters weaned more pups, had the highest litter masses at weaning, and had field metabolic rates that were almost 1·5 times greater than females raising control or reduced litters. Contrary to our prediction, there were no negative impacts of greater maternal investment and higher energy expenditure on the probability of maternal survival or future reproduction. Pups from augmented litters grew more slowly during the lactation period were smaller at weaning and had a lower probability of survival over-winter. Thus, although females were capable of raising more young than they gave birth to without short-term costs of reduced survival or fecundity, our observations suggest that limitations to litter size are not due to a trade-off in the allocation of energy, but rather due to the reduced survival of offspring from larger litters.Examining the proximate mechanisms hypothesized to underlie life-history trade-offs can be challenging but is critical for a comprehensive understanding of the evolution of life histories.

KW - Cost of reproduction

KW - Doubly-labelled water

KW - Fecundity

KW - Field metabolic rate

KW - Litter size

KW - Survival

KW - Urocitellus columbianus

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84887817121&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/1365-2435.12130

DO - 10.1111/1365-2435.12130

M3 - Article

VL - 27

SP - 1382

EP - 1391

JO - Functional Ecology

JF - Functional Ecology

SN - 0269-8463

IS - 6

ER -