The Admissibility of Covert Video Data Evidence in Wildlife Crime Proceedings: A 'Public Authority' Issue?

Philip Glover

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Examines recent decisions by the Crown Office Procurator Fiscal Service not to proceed with prosecutions for wildlife crime despite having apparently strong recorded video data evidence recorded by wildlife activist investigators.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)269-279
Number of pages11
JournalJuridical Review
Volume4
Publication statusPublished - 13 Dec 2017

Fingerprint

Crime
Crowns
Research Personnel

Keywords

  • wildlife
  • investigatory powers
  • RIPA
  • RIP(S)A
  • RSPB
  • Data aggregation
  • Evidence
  • public authority

Cite this

The Admissibility of Covert Video Data Evidence in Wildlife Crime Proceedings : A 'Public Authority' Issue? / Glover, Philip.

In: Juridical Review, Vol. 4, 13.12.2017, p. 269-279.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0a2fb8ff57e142f8a4012c036499521e,
title = "The Admissibility of Covert Video Data Evidence in Wildlife Crime Proceedings: A 'Public Authority' Issue?",
abstract = "Examines recent decisions by the Crown Office Procurator Fiscal Service not to proceed with prosecutions for wildlife crime despite having apparently strong recorded video data evidence recorded by wildlife activist investigators.",
keywords = "wildlife, investigatory powers, RIPA , RIP(S)A , RSPB, Data aggregation, Evidence, public authority",
author = "Philip Glover",
year = "2017",
month = "12",
day = "13",
language = "English",
volume = "4",
pages = "269--279",
journal = "Juridical Review",
issn = "0022-6785",
publisher = "W. Green & sons",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Admissibility of Covert Video Data Evidence in Wildlife Crime Proceedings

T2 - A 'Public Authority' Issue?

AU - Glover, Philip

PY - 2017/12/13

Y1 - 2017/12/13

N2 - Examines recent decisions by the Crown Office Procurator Fiscal Service not to proceed with prosecutions for wildlife crime despite having apparently strong recorded video data evidence recorded by wildlife activist investigators.

AB - Examines recent decisions by the Crown Office Procurator Fiscal Service not to proceed with prosecutions for wildlife crime despite having apparently strong recorded video data evidence recorded by wildlife activist investigators.

KW - wildlife

KW - investigatory powers

KW - RIPA

KW - RIP(S)A

KW - RSPB

KW - Data aggregation

KW - Evidence

KW - public authority

M3 - Article

VL - 4

SP - 269

EP - 279

JO - Juridical Review

JF - Juridical Review

SN - 0022-6785

ER -