The Admissibility of Covert Video Data Evidence in Wildlife Crime Proceedings: A 'Public Authority' Issue?

Philip Glover

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Examines recent decisions by the Crown Office Procurator Fiscal Service not to proceed with prosecutions for wildlife crime despite having apparently strong recorded video data evidence recorded by wildlife activist investigators.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)269-279
Number of pages11
JournalJuridical Review
Volume4
Publication statusPublished - 13 Dec 2017

Keywords

  • wildlife
  • investigatory powers
  • RIPA
  • RIP(S)A
  • RSPB
  • Data aggregation
  • Evidence
  • public authority

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The Admissibility of Covert Video Data Evidence in Wildlife Crime Proceedings: A 'Public Authority' Issue?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this