| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 381-387 |
| Number of pages | 7 |
| Journal | Edinburgh Law Review |
| Volume | 17 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2013 |
Cite this
The admissibility of previous false allegations of sexual assault : CJM (No 2) v HM Advocate. / Duff, Peter.
In: Edinburgh Law Review, Vol. 17, No. 3, 2013, p. 381-387.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
Duff, P 2013, 'The admissibility of previous false allegations of sexual assault: CJM (No 2) v HM Advocate', Edinburgh Law Review, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 381-387. https://doi.org/10.3366/elr.2013.0172
@article{01b3540280f54db4827eefe34656f12a,
title = "The admissibility of previous false allegations of sexual assault: CJM (No 2) v HM Advocate",
author = "Peter Duff",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.3366/elr.2013.0172",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "381--387",
journal = "Edinburgh Law Review",
issn = "1364-9809",
publisher = "Edinburgh University Press",
number = "3",
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - The admissibility of previous false allegations of sexual assault
T2 - CJM (No 2) v HM Advocate
AU - Duff, Peter
PY - 2013
Y1 - 2013
U2 - 10.3366/elr.2013.0172
DO - 10.3366/elr.2013.0172
M3 - Article
VL - 17
SP - 381
EP - 387
JO - Edinburgh Law Review
JF - Edinburgh Law Review
SN - 1364-9809
IS - 3
ER -