The admissibility of previous false allegations of sexual assault

CJM (No 2) v HM Advocate

Peter Duff

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)381-387
Number of pages7
JournalEdinburgh Law Review
Volume17
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Cite this

The admissibility of previous false allegations of sexual assault : CJM (No 2) v HM Advocate. / Duff, Peter.

In: Edinburgh Law Review, Vol. 17, No. 3, 2013, p. 381-387.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article

Duff, P 2013, 'The admissibility of previous false allegations of sexual assault: CJM (No 2) v HM Advocate', Edinburgh Law Review, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 381-387. https://doi.org/10.3366/elr.2013.0172
Duff P. The admissibility of previous false allegations of sexual assault: CJM (No 2) v HM Advocate. Edinburgh Law Review. 2013;17(3):381-387. https://doi.org/10.3366/elr.2013.0172
Duff, Peter. / The admissibility of previous false allegations of sexual assault : CJM (No 2) v HM Advocate. In: Edinburgh Law Review. 2013 ; Vol. 17, No. 3. pp. 381-387.
@article{01b3540280f54db4827eefe34656f12a,
title = "The admissibility of previous false allegations of sexual assault: CJM (No 2) v HM Advocate",
author = "Peter Duff",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.3366/elr.2013.0172",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "381--387",
journal = "Edinburgh Law Review",
issn = "1364-9809",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The admissibility of previous false allegations of sexual assault

T2 - CJM (No 2) v HM Advocate

AU - Duff, Peter

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

U2 - 10.3366/elr.2013.0172

DO - 10.3366/elr.2013.0172

M3 - Article

VL - 17

SP - 381

EP - 387

JO - Edinburgh Law Review

JF - Edinburgh Law Review

SN - 1364-9809

IS - 3

ER -

Access to Document