Abstract
We consider the problem of targeting benefits when the decision-maker cannot ascertain an applicant's income, but can assign probabilities with respect to the level of his resources. A decision-theoretic framework is used to analyze the decision to grant a benefit of fixed size. The proposed rule consists in balancing the expected social cost of denying assistance to the needy (type-I error) against that of granting a benefit to a non-poor (type-II error). Thus, when the costs of type-I errors are on the rise, or those of type-II errors fall, it becomes more desirable to increase population coverage of the programme. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 873-893 |
Number of pages | 21 |
Journal | Economic Modelling |
Volume | 20 |
Issue number | 4 |
Early online date | 11 Sep 2002 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Jul 2003 |
Keywords
- poverty
- imperfect information
- allocation of benefits
- poverty-alleviation
- welfare
- information