The biotic effects of large bolide impacts

size versus time and place

Gordon Mark Walkden, Julian Parker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In estimating the biotic effects of large terrestrial impacts we are greatly reliant upon apparent crater diameter as a proxy for impact magnitude. This underlies the "kill-curve" approach where crater size is graphed directly against likely percentage of lost taxa. However, crater diameter is a complex product of syn- and post-impact processes that can be site-dependent. Furthermore, location (global positioning) and timing (moment in geological history) also strongly influence biotic effects. We examine 4 of our largest and best documented Phanerozoic impacts to explore this more holistic size-time-place relationship. Only the c.180km end Cretaceous Chicxulub crater (Mexico) links to any substantial immediate extinction and some of the worst effects stem from where it struck the planet (a continental margin carbonate platform site) and when (a time of high regional and global biodiversity). Both the c.100km late Triassic Manicouagan crater in NE Canada (arid continental interior, low regional and world biodiversity) and the c.35Ma 100 km Popigai crater, Siberia (continental arctic desert) provide much less damaging scenarios. However the c.90km Chesapeake Bay crater, Eastern USA (also c.35Ma) marks a far more sensitive site, potentially Chicxulub - like in important respects, but it also proved relatively benign. Here the rheologically varied shallow marine target site generated an anomalously broad crater and the scale of the impact seems to have been overestimated. We offer a new approach to the graphical prediction of biotic risk using 3 dimensions, where both crater diameter and a generalised time/place-related factor we term "vulnerability" are variables.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)209-215
Number of pages6
JournalInternational Journal of Astrobiology
Volume7
Issue number3-4
Early online date1 Oct 2008
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2008

Fingerprint

bolide
craters
crater
biodiversity
Chesapeake Bay
Siberia
carbonates
biological diversity
Arctic region
deserts
extinction
Mexico
Canada
history
stems
prediction
Chesapeake Bay (US)
continental interior
effect
vulnerability

Keywords

  • impacts
  • kill-curve
  • Chicxulub
  • Manicouagan
  • Popigai
  • Chesapeake
  • cratering
  • mass extinction
  • ejecta
  • bolide

Cite this

The biotic effects of large bolide impacts : size versus time and place. / Walkden, Gordon Mark; Parker, Julian.

In: International Journal of Astrobiology, Vol. 7, No. 3-4, 01.10.2008, p. 209-215.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6df11b0494be426d8e52461aac794a4c,
title = "The biotic effects of large bolide impacts: size versus time and place",
abstract = "In estimating the biotic effects of large terrestrial impacts we are greatly reliant upon apparent crater diameter as a proxy for impact magnitude. This underlies the {"}kill-curve{"} approach where crater size is graphed directly against likely percentage of lost taxa. However, crater diameter is a complex product of syn- and post-impact processes that can be site-dependent. Furthermore, location (global positioning) and timing (moment in geological history) also strongly influence biotic effects. We examine 4 of our largest and best documented Phanerozoic impacts to explore this more holistic size-time-place relationship. Only the c.180km end Cretaceous Chicxulub crater (Mexico) links to any substantial immediate extinction and some of the worst effects stem from where it struck the planet (a continental margin carbonate platform site) and when (a time of high regional and global biodiversity). Both the c.100km late Triassic Manicouagan crater in NE Canada (arid continental interior, low regional and world biodiversity) and the c.35Ma 100 km Popigai crater, Siberia (continental arctic desert) provide much less damaging scenarios. However the c.90km Chesapeake Bay crater, Eastern USA (also c.35Ma) marks a far more sensitive site, potentially Chicxulub - like in important respects, but it also proved relatively benign. Here the rheologically varied shallow marine target site generated an anomalously broad crater and the scale of the impact seems to have been overestimated. We offer a new approach to the graphical prediction of biotic risk using 3 dimensions, where both crater diameter and a generalised time/place-related factor we term {"}vulnerability{"} are variables.",
keywords = "impacts, kill-curve, Chicxulub, Manicouagan, Popigai, Chesapeake, cratering, mass extinction, ejecta, bolide",
author = "Walkden, {Gordon Mark} and Julian Parker",
year = "2008",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/S1473550408004266",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "209--215",
journal = "International Journal of Astrobiology",
issn = "1473-5504",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "3-4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The biotic effects of large bolide impacts

T2 - size versus time and place

AU - Walkden, Gordon Mark

AU - Parker, Julian

PY - 2008/10/1

Y1 - 2008/10/1

N2 - In estimating the biotic effects of large terrestrial impacts we are greatly reliant upon apparent crater diameter as a proxy for impact magnitude. This underlies the "kill-curve" approach where crater size is graphed directly against likely percentage of lost taxa. However, crater diameter is a complex product of syn- and post-impact processes that can be site-dependent. Furthermore, location (global positioning) and timing (moment in geological history) also strongly influence biotic effects. We examine 4 of our largest and best documented Phanerozoic impacts to explore this more holistic size-time-place relationship. Only the c.180km end Cretaceous Chicxulub crater (Mexico) links to any substantial immediate extinction and some of the worst effects stem from where it struck the planet (a continental margin carbonate platform site) and when (a time of high regional and global biodiversity). Both the c.100km late Triassic Manicouagan crater in NE Canada (arid continental interior, low regional and world biodiversity) and the c.35Ma 100 km Popigai crater, Siberia (continental arctic desert) provide much less damaging scenarios. However the c.90km Chesapeake Bay crater, Eastern USA (also c.35Ma) marks a far more sensitive site, potentially Chicxulub - like in important respects, but it also proved relatively benign. Here the rheologically varied shallow marine target site generated an anomalously broad crater and the scale of the impact seems to have been overestimated. We offer a new approach to the graphical prediction of biotic risk using 3 dimensions, where both crater diameter and a generalised time/place-related factor we term "vulnerability" are variables.

AB - In estimating the biotic effects of large terrestrial impacts we are greatly reliant upon apparent crater diameter as a proxy for impact magnitude. This underlies the "kill-curve" approach where crater size is graphed directly against likely percentage of lost taxa. However, crater diameter is a complex product of syn- and post-impact processes that can be site-dependent. Furthermore, location (global positioning) and timing (moment in geological history) also strongly influence biotic effects. We examine 4 of our largest and best documented Phanerozoic impacts to explore this more holistic size-time-place relationship. Only the c.180km end Cretaceous Chicxulub crater (Mexico) links to any substantial immediate extinction and some of the worst effects stem from where it struck the planet (a continental margin carbonate platform site) and when (a time of high regional and global biodiversity). Both the c.100km late Triassic Manicouagan crater in NE Canada (arid continental interior, low regional and world biodiversity) and the c.35Ma 100 km Popigai crater, Siberia (continental arctic desert) provide much less damaging scenarios. However the c.90km Chesapeake Bay crater, Eastern USA (also c.35Ma) marks a far more sensitive site, potentially Chicxulub - like in important respects, but it also proved relatively benign. Here the rheologically varied shallow marine target site generated an anomalously broad crater and the scale of the impact seems to have been overestimated. We offer a new approach to the graphical prediction of biotic risk using 3 dimensions, where both crater diameter and a generalised time/place-related factor we term "vulnerability" are variables.

KW - impacts

KW - kill-curve

KW - Chicxulub

KW - Manicouagan

KW - Popigai

KW - Chesapeake

KW - cratering

KW - mass extinction

KW - ejecta

KW - bolide

U2 - 10.1017/S1473550408004266

DO - 10.1017/S1473550408004266

M3 - Article

VL - 7

SP - 209

EP - 215

JO - International Journal of Astrobiology

JF - International Journal of Astrobiology

SN - 1473-5504

IS - 3-4

ER -