The buck stops here

Midwives and maternity care in rural Scotland

Fiona M. Harris (Corresponding Author), Edwin Van Teijlingen, Vanora Hundley, Jane Farmer, Helen M M Bryers, Jan Caldow, Jillian Ireland, Alice Kiger, Janet Tucker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: to explore and understand what it means to provide midwifery care in remote and rural Scotland.

DESIGN: qualitative interviews with 72 staff from 10 maternity units, analysed via a case study approach.

SETTING: remote and rural areas of Scotland.

PARTICIPANTS: predominantly midwives, with some additional interviews with paramedics, general surgeons, anaesthetists and GPs.

FINDINGS: remote and rural maternity care includes a range of settings and models of care. However, the impact of rural geographies on decision-making and risk assessment is common to all settings. Making decisions and dealing with the implications of these decisions is, in many cases, done without onsite specialist support. This has implications for the skills and competencies that are needed to practice midwifery in remote and rural settings. Whereas most rural midwives reported that their skills in risk assessment and decisions to transfer were well developed and appropriate to practising in their particular settings, they perceived these decisions to be under scrutiny by urban-based colleagues and felt the need to stress their competence in the face of what they imagined to be stereotypes of rural incompetence.

CONCLUSIONS: this study shows that skills in risk assessment and decision-making are central to high quality remote and rural midwifery care. However, linked to different perspectives on care, there is a risk that these skills can be undermined by contact with colleagues in large urban units, particularly when staff do not know each other well. There is a need to develop a professional understanding between midwives in different locations.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: it is important for the good working relationships between urban and rural maternity units that all midwives understand the importance of contextual knowledge in both decisions to transfer from rural locations and the position of midwives in receiving units. Multiprofessional CPD courses have been effective in bringing together teams around obstetric emergencies; we suggest that a similar format may be required in considering issues of transfer.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)301-307
Number of pages7
JournalMidwifery
Volume27
Issue number3
Early online date17 Jan 2011
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2011

Fingerprint

Midwifery
Scotland
Decision Making
Interviews
Allied Health Personnel
Geography
Mental Competency
Obstetrics
Emergencies

Keywords

  • Rural maternity care
  • Constructing rurality
  • Embodied midwifery practice

Cite this

Harris, F. M., Van Teijlingen, E., Hundley, V., Farmer, J., Bryers, H. M. M., Caldow, J., ... Tucker, J. (2011). The buck stops here: Midwives and maternity care in rural Scotland. Midwifery, 27(3), 301-307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2010.10.007

The buck stops here : Midwives and maternity care in rural Scotland. / Harris, Fiona M. (Corresponding Author); Van Teijlingen, Edwin; Hundley, Vanora; Farmer, Jane; Bryers, Helen M M; Caldow, Jan; Ireland, Jillian; Kiger, Alice; Tucker, Janet.

In: Midwifery, Vol. 27, No. 3, 06.2011, p. 301-307.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Harris, FM, Van Teijlingen, E, Hundley, V, Farmer, J, Bryers, HMM, Caldow, J, Ireland, J, Kiger, A & Tucker, J 2011, 'The buck stops here: Midwives and maternity care in rural Scotland', Midwifery, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 301-307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2010.10.007
Harris FM, Van Teijlingen E, Hundley V, Farmer J, Bryers HMM, Caldow J et al. The buck stops here: Midwives and maternity care in rural Scotland. Midwifery. 2011 Jun;27(3):301-307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2010.10.007
Harris, Fiona M. ; Van Teijlingen, Edwin ; Hundley, Vanora ; Farmer, Jane ; Bryers, Helen M M ; Caldow, Jan ; Ireland, Jillian ; Kiger, Alice ; Tucker, Janet. / The buck stops here : Midwives and maternity care in rural Scotland. In: Midwifery. 2011 ; Vol. 27, No. 3. pp. 301-307.
@article{73e715dca6bb44fd974d8bacc7acc972,
title = "The buck stops here: Midwives and maternity care in rural Scotland",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: to explore and understand what it means to provide midwifery care in remote and rural Scotland. DESIGN: qualitative interviews with 72 staff from 10 maternity units, analysed via a case study approach. SETTING: remote and rural areas of Scotland. PARTICIPANTS: predominantly midwives, with some additional interviews with paramedics, general surgeons, anaesthetists and GPs. FINDINGS: remote and rural maternity care includes a range of settings and models of care. However, the impact of rural geographies on decision-making and risk assessment is common to all settings. Making decisions and dealing with the implications of these decisions is, in many cases, done without onsite specialist support. This has implications for the skills and competencies that are needed to practice midwifery in remote and rural settings. Whereas most rural midwives reported that their skills in risk assessment and decisions to transfer were well developed and appropriate to practising in their particular settings, they perceived these decisions to be under scrutiny by urban-based colleagues and felt the need to stress their competence in the face of what they imagined to be stereotypes of rural incompetence. CONCLUSIONS: this study shows that skills in risk assessment and decision-making are central to high quality remote and rural midwifery care. However, linked to different perspectives on care, there is a risk that these skills can be undermined by contact with colleagues in large urban units, particularly when staff do not know each other well. There is a need to develop a professional understanding between midwives in different locations. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: it is important for the good working relationships between urban and rural maternity units that all midwives understand the importance of contextual knowledge in both decisions to transfer from rural locations and the position of midwives in receiving units. Multiprofessional CPD courses have been effective in bringing together teams around obstetric emergencies; we suggest that a similar format may be required in considering issues of transfer.",
keywords = "Rural maternity care, Constructing rurality, Embodied midwifery practice",
author = "Harris, {Fiona M.} and {Van Teijlingen}, Edwin and Vanora Hundley and Jane Farmer and Bryers, {Helen M M} and Jan Caldow and Jillian Ireland and Alice Kiger and Janet Tucker",
year = "2011",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1016/j.midw.2010.10.007",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "301--307",
journal = "Midwifery",
issn = "0266-6138",
publisher = "Churchill Livingstone",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The buck stops here

T2 - Midwives and maternity care in rural Scotland

AU - Harris, Fiona M.

AU - Van Teijlingen, Edwin

AU - Hundley, Vanora

AU - Farmer, Jane

AU - Bryers, Helen M M

AU - Caldow, Jan

AU - Ireland, Jillian

AU - Kiger, Alice

AU - Tucker, Janet

PY - 2011/6

Y1 - 2011/6

N2 - OBJECTIVE: to explore and understand what it means to provide midwifery care in remote and rural Scotland. DESIGN: qualitative interviews with 72 staff from 10 maternity units, analysed via a case study approach. SETTING: remote and rural areas of Scotland. PARTICIPANTS: predominantly midwives, with some additional interviews with paramedics, general surgeons, anaesthetists and GPs. FINDINGS: remote and rural maternity care includes a range of settings and models of care. However, the impact of rural geographies on decision-making and risk assessment is common to all settings. Making decisions and dealing with the implications of these decisions is, in many cases, done without onsite specialist support. This has implications for the skills and competencies that are needed to practice midwifery in remote and rural settings. Whereas most rural midwives reported that their skills in risk assessment and decisions to transfer were well developed and appropriate to practising in their particular settings, they perceived these decisions to be under scrutiny by urban-based colleagues and felt the need to stress their competence in the face of what they imagined to be stereotypes of rural incompetence. CONCLUSIONS: this study shows that skills in risk assessment and decision-making are central to high quality remote and rural midwifery care. However, linked to different perspectives on care, there is a risk that these skills can be undermined by contact with colleagues in large urban units, particularly when staff do not know each other well. There is a need to develop a professional understanding between midwives in different locations. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: it is important for the good working relationships between urban and rural maternity units that all midwives understand the importance of contextual knowledge in both decisions to transfer from rural locations and the position of midwives in receiving units. Multiprofessional CPD courses have been effective in bringing together teams around obstetric emergencies; we suggest that a similar format may be required in considering issues of transfer.

AB - OBJECTIVE: to explore and understand what it means to provide midwifery care in remote and rural Scotland. DESIGN: qualitative interviews with 72 staff from 10 maternity units, analysed via a case study approach. SETTING: remote and rural areas of Scotland. PARTICIPANTS: predominantly midwives, with some additional interviews with paramedics, general surgeons, anaesthetists and GPs. FINDINGS: remote and rural maternity care includes a range of settings and models of care. However, the impact of rural geographies on decision-making and risk assessment is common to all settings. Making decisions and dealing with the implications of these decisions is, in many cases, done without onsite specialist support. This has implications for the skills and competencies that are needed to practice midwifery in remote and rural settings. Whereas most rural midwives reported that their skills in risk assessment and decisions to transfer were well developed and appropriate to practising in their particular settings, they perceived these decisions to be under scrutiny by urban-based colleagues and felt the need to stress their competence in the face of what they imagined to be stereotypes of rural incompetence. CONCLUSIONS: this study shows that skills in risk assessment and decision-making are central to high quality remote and rural midwifery care. However, linked to different perspectives on care, there is a risk that these skills can be undermined by contact with colleagues in large urban units, particularly when staff do not know each other well. There is a need to develop a professional understanding between midwives in different locations. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: it is important for the good working relationships between urban and rural maternity units that all midwives understand the importance of contextual knowledge in both decisions to transfer from rural locations and the position of midwives in receiving units. Multiprofessional CPD courses have been effective in bringing together teams around obstetric emergencies; we suggest that a similar format may be required in considering issues of transfer.

KW - Rural maternity care

KW - Constructing rurality

KW - Embodied midwifery practice

U2 - 10.1016/j.midw.2010.10.007

DO - 10.1016/j.midw.2010.10.007

M3 - Article

VL - 27

SP - 301

EP - 307

JO - Midwifery

JF - Midwifery

SN - 0266-6138

IS - 3

ER -